Re: [tdf-discuss] Updates and spreadsheets

Hi. I have had this also, and in writer and tables. The changes are small but can add up with long documents. I don't know the cause, if it is a slight change in kerning, or the rendering of the type or the base style changes slightly. Sometimes I can adjust the style slightly to compensate. Ste

Re: [tdf-discuss] security related information, CVE-2019-9850, CVE-2019-9851, CVE-2019-9852

Had me confused. https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/security/advisories/ Addressed in LibreOffice 6.2.6/6.3.0 CVE-2019-9850 Insufficient url validation allowing LibreLog

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V only works for 1 cell in Calc

e for me. :) I'll keep trying. Makes me a bit sad that it works in Windows XP and not on Debian. It's not a big deal just an annoyance. On Dec 9, 2014 1:33 PM, "Steve Edmonds" <mailto:steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com>> wrote: This seems to work fine in my Opensuse wi

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V only works for 1 cell in Calc

This seems to work fine in my Opensuse with LO 4.1.6. steve On 2014-12-10 04:58, RichardH wrote: In Windows version copy and paste works as expected. In Linux versions it doesn't. In Windows, copy 1 to 1+n cells and paste them where you wish. In Linux, copy 1 to 1+n cells and you get a dialog w

Re: [tdf-discuss] Cannot Open PDF Landscape Pages Properly When Libreoffice

es. Tony Using Ubuntu 14.04 On 3 December 2014 at 22:29, Steve Edmonds wrote: Hi. You could try printing to file as postscript and then converting the postscript to PDF. (Ghostscript, ps2pdf are free). I have to do this with quite a few of my files because LO fails to create correct PDF's.

Re: [tdf-discuss] Cannot Open PDF Landscape Pages Properly When Libreoffice

Hi. You could try printing to file as postscript and then converting the postscript to PDF. (Ghostscript, ps2pdf are free). I have to do this with quite a few of my files because LO fails to create correct PDF's. Steve On 2014-12-02 10:15, anne-ology wrote: If it's not a bug in these n

Re: [tdf-discuss] Help please with LibreOffice

On 2014-04-10 08:41, Mike Brookes wrote: Hi I've used LibreOffice for a number of years trouble-free. I have a laptop and use windows, not Mac. Last weekend I downloaded to my laptop a new application for downloading music from YouTube; it didn't work and I proceeded to uninstall it through s

Re: [tdf-discuss] Donations system: pay for a feature

On 2013-05-16 07:45, Joel Madero wrote: Any payments and/or donations must be accounted for and if the person paying has any intent it to go to xyz, then by regulations we may need to account for that payment/donation and where it went to. That is the real problem with targeted donations and

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: End of Life support for MSO 2003 countdown ?

On 2013-04-24 05:22, Upscope wrote: On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 05:23:46 PM Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Le mardi 23 avril 2013 à 07:42 -0700, Pedro a écrit : Hi upscope upscope wrote I will be glad to supply the document if it would help, and the author agrees (should be no problem). Let me kn

Re: [tdf-discuss] Text are truncated after saving document

On 2012-06-05 14:13, rei wrote: I have documents that have been edited with several word processors (Abiword, MS. Word, etc.). When I edited, saved, and reopened them using LibreOffice, all text in those documents are always truncated, like this one: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Naming builds. Please???

On 2011-12-08 14:12, Marc Paré wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > Le 2011-12-07 16:54, christoph.no...@documentfoundation.org a écrit : >> Hi Marc, all, >> >> see >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboard/LibreOffice_Send_Feedback >> >> >> Help appreciated :-) >> >> Cheers, >> Christoph > N

Re: [tdf-discuss] Standalone PDF

On 2011-12-02 22:57, Sveinn í Felli wrote: Þann fös 2.des 2011 08:40, skrifaði Uwe Altmann: Hi Am 02.12.11 05:12, schrieb Paul: Does Libre office have a stand alone PDF application? ie - does Libre provide the PDF editor by itself without all the other features in the 200 MB download - is

Re: [tdf-discuss] [POLL] own forums

+1 Another step in the maturing of LO. steve On 10/11/11 11:56 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hello, sadly, I didn't manage yet to read all messages, but I will and will reply to. But I think (correct me if I'm wrong) we have reached a stage where we should maybe have a quick poll on whether

Re: [tdf-discuss] Advice

On 25/08/11 12:50 AM, Robert Boehm wrote: Hi...no problems...just asking for advice. I have been testing the beta builds of LO since it came out and use openSUSE as my main operating system. On my "production" machine, I have been using the "Stable" builds provided by the SUSE repository whi

Re: [tdf-discuss] [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???

On 2011-08-24 08:47, Sveinn í Felli wrote: > Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug > I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: > > The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 > and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice 3.4.2

Re: [tdf-discuss] test mail

On 9/07/11 6:35 AM, Christophe Strobbe wrote: Some of my mails never reach the list... For some reason (some setting I have) on one PC I do not see my emails received from the list when I send them to the list. I am using Google hosted domain and the mail shows up in sent but not in the li

Re: Embedding Goodies in the ODF Package (was RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: ANN: ODF 1.2 Candidate OASIS Standard ... )

On 27/06/11 11:06 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: On 27 Jun 2011, at 04:47, Marc Paré wrote: The problem with this is that now someone has to fish the fonts out of there and install them where they are actually recognized for presenting the document. If LibreOffice is updated to automate the captu

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Font Embedding in ODF (was RE: ANN: ODF 1.2 Candidate OASIS Standard Enters 60-Day Public Review)

Hi. On 2011-06-27 14:17, Robert Derman wrote: > Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >> Le Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:41:07 -0700 (PDT), >> plino a écrit : >> >> >>> Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >>> Now, as for humility, claiming in an assured and definitive way that ODF will lose if it does not em

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: ANN: ODF 1.2 Candidate OASIS Standard Enters 60-Day Public Review, prerequisite for balloting as OASIS Standard

On 27/06/11 7:04 AM, Robert Derman wrote: Jesper Lund Stocholm wrote: Hi Robert, 2011/6/25 Robert Derman : This could eventually destroy ODF as a viable world standard if at some point some software company or organization comes up with a popular program (example Microsoft) that embeds fon

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: ANN: ODF 1.2 Candidate OASIS Standard Enters 60-Day Public Review, prerequisite for balloting as OASIS Standard

On 27/06/11 6:44 AM, Jesper Lund Stocholm wrote: Hi Robert, 2011/6/25 Robert Derman: This could eventually destroy ODF as a viable world standard if at some point some software company or organization comes up with a popular program (example Microsoft) that embeds fonts so that anyone editin

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Font Embedding in ODF (was RE: ANN: ODF 1.2 ...)

Hi Dennis. On 26/06/11 13:53, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > All right, let's put a stake through the heart of this puppy. > > I just created three documents. One is pretty large so I put them at Windows > SkyDrive: >

[tdf-discuss] LO in government

Hi. Read an interesting article here which may offer some hope in light of the news from Germany. No idea of how close LO is to SaaS but could be a good standards based opportunity. http://g-cloud.ulitzer.com/node/1716064 steve -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfounda

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Mailing List FAQ

On 2011-05-26 16:11, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 15:35 +1200, Steve Edmonds wrote: > >> >> A regular (monthly) post of the faq would be good. In regards >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists/ >> it may not be linked a

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Mailing List FAQ

On 2011-05-26 15:15, NoOp wrote: > On 05/24/2011 11:43 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 2011/5/25 NoOp : >> >>> Is there one? >>> >>> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/ >>> doesn't show or refer to one. >>> >>> >> The german wiki page >> http://wiki.docum

Re: [tdf-discuss] need new string in chart type dialog of line and XY chart for smoothing line with B-spline

On 2011-05-25 11:38, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Steve Edmonds schrieb: >> >> >> On 2011-05-25 10:44, Regina Henschel wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> with ODF1.2 the way a curve is smoothed by B-spline will change. See >>> htt

Re: [tdf-discuss] need new string in chart type dialog of line and XY chart for smoothing line with B-spline

On 2011-05-25 11:38, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Steve Edmonds schrieb: >> >> >> On 2011-05-25 10:44, Regina Henschel wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> with ODF1.2 the way a curve is smoothed by B-spline will change. See >>> htt

Re: [tdf-discuss] need new string in chart type dialog of line and XY chart for smoothing line with B-spline

On 2011-05-25 10:44, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > with ODF1.2 the way a curve is smoothed by B-spline will change. See > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/cs01/OpenDocument-v1.2-cs01-part1.html, > chapter 20.26. > > The current string "Data points order" does not describe this proper

[tdf-discuss] Font Substitution.

Hi. Fonts again. Andale Sans was on my Suse from previous installs (OO) but not in LO on my mac. So My document from Suse LO tries to substitute and mucks it up. It would be a great improvement if, on opening a document with missing fonts, you were advised and told what LO plans to substitute wi

[tdf-discuss] Re: [libreoffice-design] Templates, styles, outline and bullets/numbering

On 30/04/11 4:18 AM, RGB ES wrote: 2011/4/29 Greg: 2011/4/28 Greg: Hi, I believe Writer's template, style, outline and numbering facilities are in need of a rethink. The areas I think are weak, and this is by no means a full list, are: - The template organiser dialogue - who knows how to use

Re: [tdf-discuss] Observations of LibreOffice and our users..

I agree here too. I can manage to find and install what I need and my friends/family need of LO so I have no problems. I think target the non-technical masses, like firefox. LO 3.3.2 is pretty much up to speed and it seems 3.4 will be suitable for prime time. May be now is the time to step into the

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: "There is no"

On 5/05/11 4:11 AM, M Henri Day wrote: 2011/5/4 Olivier Hallot Thanks Mike for the tip As I see, this character U+2204, does not exist in Opensymbol font, used by Math by default. At least not in the displayed characters of Math UI. So, if this symbol get implemented in Opensymbol, it will

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: "There is no"

On 2011-05-04 16:47, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Le 03/05/2011 21:26, Olivier Hallot a écrit : > >> Hi >> >> Does anybody knows if in LO Math there si a way to represent the >> mathematical symbol for "There is no", which is a barred flipped E? >> >> Is it difficult to add it to the "Elements

[tdf-discuss] Help corrections

Hi. Noticed a small error in the Help. Is a bug filed for this or just a discussion. If you search for dock and click on Navigator you get Navigator help. It states " To undock the Navigator, double-click in a free area of the Navigator." You need to CTL double click as shown below in another ar

Re: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required

On 17/04/11 2:20 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote Snip. I have been confirming some bugs, but the process is not clear. So lets start with you - why haven't you been around on IRC? (Or if you were around: why didn't you ask on IRC to be precise) The timing was not good this session, I am UT +12h

Re: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required

How was the session on triage. I suggest a latest working release instead of a beta, I cannot afford my LO not to work as I need it every day and are unsure if I can install a beta and a release copy at the same time. I do not want to take the risk. I have been confirming some bugs, but the proces

Re: [tdf-discuss] Feature Request: Capitalizing Letters:

On 2011-04-07 10:54, Steve Edmonds wrote: > > On 2011-04-07 10:02, Christoph Noack wrote: > >> Hi Laurence! >> >> Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 07:32 +1000 schrieb Laurence Jeloudev: >> >> >>> can't there be a

Re: [tdf-discuss] Feature Request: Capitalizing Letters:

On 2011-04-07 10:02, Christoph Noack wrote: > Hi Laurence! > > Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 07:32 +1000 schrieb Laurence Jeloudev: > >> can't there be a shortcut like in microsoft office for capitalisation? >> > You can define a shortcut to execute the capitalization feature. Please > g

Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences, Please make your action today against it.

written in an MS language for MS features in an MS environment on > MS software. There is no way in *hell* and Open Source software can > pinch it, copy it, reverse engineer it, duplicate it in new code or > anything else. If the macros are any use, then rewrite the damn things! > > On 05/

Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences, Please make your action today against it.

On 2011-04-06 07:19, Ercole Carpanetto wrote: > On 5 April 2011 21:08, Steve Edmonds wrote: > >> All. >> I tend to agree with Mike on many aspects. >> We use 12 instances of LO in our business and I support more privately. >> I inter-react with an educ

Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences, Please make your action today against it.

All. I tend to agree with Mike on many aspects. We use 12 instances of LO in our business and I support more privately. I inter-react with an educational institution and others predominantly MO, our business is mainly LO. For a corporation or large entity to adopt LO it must be able to transfe

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Support for Office 2003 file formats (WordML, SpreadsheetML

On 2011-03-29 14:25, Michel Gagnon wrote: > Le 2011-03-28 15:29, aqualung a écrit : >> Jaime R. Garza wrote: >>> In my opinion Must, Should, Could, Completely Irrelevant: >>> >>> - *Must*: RTF >>> - *Must*: MS Office 97/2000/XP Binary >>> - *Completely Irrelevant*: MS Office 2003 XML >>> - *Shoul

Re: RE : [tdf-discuss] Re: Feature request - embed font

On 2011-03-22 12:35, Italo Vignoli wrote: > On 03/21/2011 11:44 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote: > >> As pointed out, it may not be possible to package fonts in the document >> file because of the Open Document standard, although I would have though >> it would have been f

Re: RE : [tdf-discuss] Re: Feature request - embed font

On 22/03/11 06:44, aqualung wrote: > O.K., so is everyone now in agreement that there is no legal problem > embedding a font that explicitly licenses itself to be embedded? > > I am new here and am a bit mystified at the way discussion seems to move, > with inapposite answers to comments and then

Re: RE : [tdf-discuss] Re: Feature request - embed font

first adressed by the OpenDocument format which is not under the control of LibreOffice. Have a nice day JBF Steve Edmonds wrote: Hi. sorry, this is probably my imprecise english. By suite I meant the LO suite (group) of products, were font embedding in files to be extended to more than w

Re: RE : [tdf-discuss] Re: Feature request - embed font

On 21/03/11 10:20 AM, aqualung wrote: Thank you for your reply but I do not understand. The OP was making a feature request for font embedding to be added to LibreOffice. I commented on the licensing aspect. Now you note something about a "suite" -- do you mean "suite" as in "office suite"?

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] suggestion to improve libreoffice writer

On 21/03/11 8:23 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-03-20 3:05 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote: Would work for me, which bit of real estate would you take up with the tabs? I would hope that if I opted to open in a new window I would not loose any real estate. I'd say they should work -

Re: RE : [tdf-discuss] Re: Feature request - embed font

I suppose what I was thinking would be usefull was to have a directory within the odt file called fonts. LO would check here first for fonts called in the document. I could copy my custom TT or type 1 fonts here thereby making my document portable. This seems relatively simple. More work is invo

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] suggestion to improve libreoffice writer

On 21/03/11 6:38 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: On 2011-03-20 12:34 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: On 3/20/11 5:18 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: Adding the ability to have multiple documents as tabs in one window would be great - as long as there is a choice. Meaning, I can have multiple windows if I wan

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] suggestion to improve libreoffice writer

On 19/03/11 03:18, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2011-03-17 4:06 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote: >>> Hi. >>> This is a good point to discuss and I have posted to >>> discuss@documentfoundation.org also. >>> I prefer sep

Re: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required

On 19/03/11 00:32, sophie wrote: > Thank you, it's corrected now. >> I clicked the link it opens in FF, I log in and expect I would see >> something (not too sure what) if I retry on 15-16 Apr. > I don't understand you question sorry, could you explain what you're > doing ? The corrected info pa

[tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] suggestion to improve libreoffice writer

Hi. This is a good point to discuss and I have posted to discuss@documentfoundation.org also. I prefer separate windows because I can compare and proof documents/sheets side by side and mouse focus in linux makes scrolling without changing window focus possible. I would be disappointed if LO went t

Re: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required

On 17/03/11 23:37, sophie wrote: > > I've begin to fill the information about the IRC session I'm planing > [1]. The date will be 15-16 of April. I hope it's ok for you? > Jean-Baptiste Faure and Cedric Bosdonnat are also available to help > mentoring the session on one of the two days too. > Chr

Re: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required

On 17/03/11 22:25, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Steve Edmonds schrieb: > >> Also that link suggests discussing the bug in users list for >> confirmation. > > Hi, > > that might be some misunderstanding. Discussion in mailing list is > recommended if > - there is

Re: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required

Hi. Confirming bugs may be one small part I can contribute. I have looked at the bugs list when I filed one myself. The procedure for filing a bug http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport suggests searching for bugs first, the search tool is not user friendly. Also that link suggests discussin

Re: [tdf-discuss] Bug or new feature

Thanks, I get by with PS2PDF but don't get the table of contents working. With SVG support, may be a conversion of my EPS's to SVG will solve the problem. Cheers, steve On 15/03/11 21:04, Fernand Vanrie wrote: > Steve, > > I filed 2 years ago a issue on OO for that. > Indeed it blocks a lot of eff

Re: [tdf-discuss] Bug or new feature

-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Le 14/03/2011 19:45, Steve Edmonds a écrit : > >> Hi. >> LO, also OO do not create pdf's correctly from documents containing >> EPS's. >> This occurs on 3.3.1 on Suse and OSX. >> The PDF is not created with the vector data of the

[tdf-discuss] Bug or new feature

Hi. LO, also OO do not create pdf's correctly from documents containing EPS's. This occurs on 3.3.1 on Suse and OSX. The PDF is not created with the vector data of the EPS but the low resolution bitmap (if there is one) used for positioning. To create a correct PDF I must print to file (PS) and

[tdf-discuss] Feature request - embed font

Hi. I have been a SO, OO, now LO user for many years. One area where I frequently encounter hassle is with layout changes due to different fonts on different PC's. Most of my documents are data sheets or manuals and include special fonts (LCD display, etc.) and even with standard fonts there ca