On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Michael Wheatland wrote (04-01-11 02:59)
If everyone was as clear and concise as you there would be no
confusion about any issues.
No, to me this is an obvious example of someone apparently unable to
understand,
Please do
Michael,
2011/1/4 Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Michael Wheatland wrote (04-01-11 02:59)
If everyone was as clear and concise as you there would be no
confusion about any issues.
No, to me this is an
Hello Michael,
2011/1/4 Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello Michael,
Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:26:09 +0930,
Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 4,
On 4 January 2011 07:37, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Michael Wheatland wrote (04-01-11 02:59)
If everyone was as clear and concise as you there would be no
confusion about any issues.
No, to me this is an obvious example of someone apparently unable to
understand,
Hm, has anyone
Silverstripe site is that they don't understand the CMS and are not really
interested in learning it.
It is true, once you use Drupal, you will never install another CMS.
That seems to me an important consideration long term. If there is likely to
be more and longer term committed developer
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2011-01-02 12:13 PM, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
I have a concern about the Addons. In my 10+ years of using
OpenOffice/StarOffice, the
inclusion of addons was a great idea. However, the marketing of addons was
On 3 Jan 2011 at 17:29, Michael Wheatland wrote:
Could addons be clearly signposted on the main page?
Could first-time users be taken to the addons page, so they know
functionality can be
extended?
Could addons be clearly posted in the menus?
Could the frequency of downloading
On 03/01/2011 8:46 PM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
Le Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:58:18 -,
Zaphod Feeblejocks zapho...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 3 Jan 2011 at 17:29, Michael Wheatland wrote:
Could addons be clearly signposted on the main
Todd,
Le Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:50:36 -0500,
todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Michael Wheatland
mich...@wheatland.com.au wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Zaphod Feeblejocks
zapho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 Jan 2011 at 9:59, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
Michael,
Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:28:58 +0930,
Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au a écrit :
On 03/01/2011 8:46 PM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
Le Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:58:18 -,
Zaphod Feeblejocks zapho...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
to implement the Silverstripe CMS on Drupal.org does not seem to mean
anything to me. With a view to go with Drupal was rather: with the
possible option of Drupal in the long term.
Sorry, I meant to
Hi,
Am 03.01.2011 16:20, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
a little bit of misinformation, Michael, is perhaps your enthusiasm
leading to understand things the way you would like them to be :-). At
this stage, I don't believe we have any clear plans to move to Drupal;
there seems indeed to have
Hi Michael,
Michael Wheatland wrote (03-01-11 16:56)
To make this clear in my mind I have listened and read the decision
statement from the Steering Committee decision.
The conversation on the conference call:
I would ask the people working on Drupal to do a more detailed
planning in the next
Hello Michael,
Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:26:09 +0930,
Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
to implement the Silverstripe CMS on Drupal.org does not seem to
mean anything to me. With
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello Michael,
Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:26:09 +0930,
Michael Wheatland mich...@wheatland.com.au a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
On 2 Jan 2011 at 9:59, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
I also agree that ANY write-to docx should be an add-on, and not part of
the vanilla release.
Hi Craig,
I have a concern about the Addons. In my 10+ years of using
OpenOffice/StarOffice, the
inclusion of addons was a great idea. However, the
On 2011-01-02 12:13 PM, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
I have a concern about the Addons. In my 10+ years of using
OpenOffice/StarOffice, the
inclusion of addons was a great idea. However, the marketing of addons was
not so good -
hidden away in a place that you can find once, but not so
17 matches
Mail list logo
