Is anybody else concerned by the fact that emails are in clear in the
list archives (not to mention easily delineated by angle brackets)?
I don't think it would take much for an enterprising hacker to compile
all the emails from the list archives.
Can we not feed the spammers easy targets, pl
On Thu Oct 07 2010 15:18:23 GMT-0700 (PDT) Scott Furry wrote:
Is anybody else concerned by the fact that emails are in clear in the
list archives (not to mention easily delineated by angle brackets)?
I don't think it would take much for an enterprising hacker to compile
all the emails from t
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 15:24 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
> On Thu Oct 07 2010 15:18:23 GMT-0700 (PDT) Scott Furry wrote:
> > Is anybody else concerned by the fact that emails are in clear in the
> > list archives (not to mention easily delineated by angle brackets)?
> >
> > I don't think it would t
On 07/10/10 04:56 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 15:24 -0700, Andy Brown wrote:
On Thu Oct 07 2010 15:18:23 GMT-0700 (PDT) Scott Furry wrote:
Is anybody else concerned by the fact that emails are in clear in the
list archives (not to mention easily delineated by angle br
On Thu Oct 07 2010 16:04:38 GMT-0700 (PDT) Scott Furry wrote:
I'm sorry Andy, what warnings are you talking about.
Clicking on the "subscribe" link from the site window just brings up an
email client window.
And the site privacy statement doesn't given state anything specific
about forum cont
У пет, 08. 10 2010. у 08:56 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber пише:
> Many of the other lists that I subscribe to have the
> email addresses given as something like j...@ in the archives.
> However, the OOo archives have them in plain text.
I believe this should be prevented. I just found in docs
Hi Jean, *,
Jean Hollis Weber schrieb:
[.. clear text mailadresses in tdf mailarchive ..]
>To answer Scott's original question: It's not something that concerns
> me personally. My many email addresses are all over the internet, so
> having my address harvested from another list makes no differe
Hi Goran, *,
Goran Rakic schrieb:
>У пет, 08. 10 2010. у 08:56 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber пише:
>> Many of the other lists that I subscribe to have the
>> email addresses given as something like j...@ in the
>> archives. However, the OOo archives have them in plain text.
>I believe this s
Hi,
Am 08.10.2010 um 10:13 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
>> I believe this should be prevented. I just found in docs that there
is
>> a SPAMMODE option:
>> http://mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/spammode.html
>
> +1
>
Honestly, I disagree. Hiding mail addresses really doesn't help that
much, a
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 08.10.2010 um 10:13 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
>
>>> I believe this should be prevented. I just found in docs that there
> is
>>> a SPAMMODE option:
>>> http://mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/spammode.html
>>
>> +1
>>
>
>
On 2010-10-08 8:38 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Honestly, I disagree. Hiding mail addresses really doesn't help that
> much, and to me, the disadvantages (like being unable to contact
> someone directly from the archives) are larger than the advantages
> you think it has.
>
> I'm happy to swi
Hi Florian, *,
Florian Effenberger schrieb:
>Am 08.10.2010 um 10:13 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
>>> I believe this should be prevented. I just found in docs that there
>>> a SPAMMODE option:
>>> http://mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/spammode.html
>>
>> +1
>Honestly, I disagree. Hiding mail
In data 08 ottobre 2010 alle ore 15:36:44, Charles Marcus
ha scritto:
Security through obscurity doesn't work.
If you have spam problems, use good anti-spam software.
Well, indeed, spam should not be facilitated rather than managed via
software after your address has been added to some ad
Hi Gianluca Turconi, *,
Gianluca Turconi schrieb:
[..]
>Therefore, I had to unsubscribe form all TDF lists, create a new
> address for these lists and then subscribe to them again. Woff... :(
Too late! You missed the train. Your old (former good) mailadress is
online - well prepared food for th
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 14:38 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 08.10.2010 um 10:13 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
>
> >> I believe this should be prevented. I just found in docs that there
> is
> >> a SPAMMODE option:
> >> http://mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/spammode.html
> >
>
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Too late! You missed the train. Your old (former good) mailadress is
online - well prepared food for the next harvester coming around which
now can grab two adresses from You ;o))
Yeah, I know, but maybe a ad bot crawler may have mercy of me since I
used that addres
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 07:28:01 +1000
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 14:38 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 08.10.2010 um 10:13 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
> >
> > >> I believe this should be prevented. I just found in docs that
> > >> there
> > is
> > >> a
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrot
e:
> I agree with Florian that hiding addresses doesn't help much, and the
> disadvantages are greater (for me). I vote to leave the lists as they
> are. But we do need to add to the warning on the signup page.
>
This is an example on
Hi Gianluca, *,
Gianluca Turconi schrieb:
>Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
>> Too late! You missed the train. Your old (former good) mailadress is
>> online - well prepared food for the next harvester coming around
>> which now can grab two adresses from You ;o))
>Yeah, I know, but maybe a ad bot cr
On 10/08/2010 02:28 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 14:38 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Honestly, I disagree. Hiding mail addresses really doesn't help that
much, and to me, the disadvantages (like being unable to contact someone
directly from the archives) are larger th
20 matches
Mail list logo
