On 12/19/06, joehewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh man, that is totally awesome. Just the kind of thing I was hoping
people
would do with Firebug. The jQuery community rocks! :)
- Joe
Thanks Joe! I know you've probably been hearing this alot lately, but
Firebug (particulary 1.0 beta) rea
Thanks for stopping by Joe. Firebug rocks man and we're VERY
appreciative of your efforts. Thanks for making this amazing tool for us
developers.
Rey
joehewitt wrote:
> Oh man, that is totally awesome. Just the kind of thing I was hoping people
> would do with Firebug. The jQuery community ro
Oh man, that is totally awesome. Just the kind of thing I was hoping people
would do with Firebug. The jQuery community rocks! :)
- Joe
If you want some more detail (and have Firefox with Firebug 1.0 Beta
installed), you can head on over to
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com/tests/jquery/speed-test
Stephen Woodbridge schrieb:
> OK, here is an interesting tidbit.
>
> I used the test below and and did the 7 click thing, and out of all my
> tests except one, the long delay happened in has() and once I got it in
> find(). has() is pretty simple and I wonder if this has less to do with
> the nu
btw, I just added a text input so you can run whatever query you want
on the page. just type in the selector -- without $() -- and press
the Test! button.
In case anyone wants to try but has lost the thread, here is the URL
again:
http://test.learningjquery.com/speed-test.htm
On Dec 19, 2
Dragan, I think what Christof is getting at is this: on any given page,
#myid could be uniquely assigned to a div or a paragraph or a span or an
image or any other element. So, page 1 could have and
page 2 could have
If the same script is being included on multiple pages, it might be
necessar
Hi all,
With the tests I ran (http://fmarcia.info/jquery/speedtest.html [1]),
the quickest way to retrieve one element is
$(document.getElementById(id)), even better than $('#id')!
Off course, to get even better performance, one should cache queries
every time it's possible!
My 2 cents,
Franck.
OK, here is an interesting tidbit.
I used the test below and and did the 7 click thing, and out of all my
tests except one, the long delay happened in has() and once I got it in
find(). has() is pretty simple and I wonder if this has less to do with
the number of clicks versus the number of reg
Hi,
> If you want to keep performance, maybe it's better to do:
>
> if( $("#myid").is('div.myclass')) alert("YEAH, WE GOT IT");
> else alert("Ha, my ID is misused!!");
Yes, of course. If I whant to use jQuery methods I could also use filter():
$('#myid').filter('div.myclass').addClass('hereWeGo'
Hi,
> I think what Christof is getting at is this: [...]
Yes, exactly.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On Dec 19, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Aaron Heimlich wrote:
If you want some more detail (and have Firefox with Firebug 1.0
Beta installed), you can head on over to http://
aheimlich.freepgs.com/tests/jquery/speed-test-firebug/ where I
replicated Karl's tests using Firebug 1.0 Beta's script profiling
Hi,
> > > ID should be uniqe over the page, so div#myid is redundant.
> > [...]
>
> I know that. My point is that there should not be two elements with same id
> on the page. At least, I'm developing like that.
But that doesn't make the expression div#myid redundant. Of course the id
should be
If you want to keep performance, maybe it's better to do:
if( $("#myid").is('div.myclass')) alert("YEAH, WE GOT IT");
else alert("Ha, my ID is misused!!");
Wow. When I started writing this reply, I thought of using tagName and
className,
but is() is so much more elegant.
Christof Donat wrote:
2006/12/19, Christof Donat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
> ID should be uniqe over the page, so div#myid is redundant.
No, it isn't. It should return an empty jQuery-Object in case the Element
with
the id "myid" is not a div. That is usefull when you produce your Content
dynamically (e.g. with PHP
> looking for an ID (which should be unique) after getting the tags is
> worthless.
Should we re-write the case of # to use elem.getElementBYId(),
and then remove the element if it's not the right tag?
- Brian
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.co
Hi,
> ID should be uniqe over the page, so div#myid is redundant.
No, it isn't. It should return an empty jQuery-Object in case the Element with
the id "myid" is not a div. That is usefull when you produce your Content
dynamically (e.g. with PHP). The same is true for .myclass#myid, or even
d
2006/12/19, Christof Donat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
> looking for an ID (which should be unique) after getting the tags is
> worthless.
Well, it shouldn't be. I might whant to hide an Element with the id "myid"
only if it is an image. Then I'd try first $('img#myid').hide() and expect
it
to wo
Hi,
> $(.dialog) does 815 function calls ()
> $('#speech28') does 6 function calls
That is not very surprizing. $('#speech28') only needs to call
getElementById() and make a jQuery Object from it. $('.dialog') gets all
elements, puts them into an array and filters that array for the classna
Hi,
> looking for an ID (which should be unique) after getting the tags is
> worthless.
Well, it shouldn't be. I might whant to hide an Element with the id "myid"
only if it is an image. Then I'd try first $('img#myid').hide() and expect it
to work like $('#myid').filter('img').hide().
Christo
On 12/19/06, Aaron Heimlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
$(.dialog) does 815 function calls ()
Whoops! that should be:
$('.dialog') does 851 function calls ()
--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com
___
If you want some more detail (and have Firefox with Firebug 1.0 Beta
installed), you can head on over to
http://aheimlich.freepgs.com/tests/jquery/speed-test-firebug/ where I
replicated Karl's tests using Firebug 1.0 Beta's script profiling abilities.
The results aren't much different from Karl's,
Thank you for that summary, Jake! And for the stat lesson. :)
On Dec 18, 2006, at 11:19 PM, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
Since the 7th click is reproducible, and has little to do with the
issue, you can discard the value, with a simple note... years of
stat classes!
conclusions:
running thru the whole dom
Since the 7th click is reproducible, and has little to do with the issue,
you can discard the value, with a simple note... years of stat classes!
conclusions:
running thru the whole dom looking for a class is slow.
looking for an ID (which should be unique) after getting the tags is
worthless.
lo
Hey everyone,
I have results of a few more speed tests that I ran this evening at
http://test.learningjquery.com/speed-test.htm
Method: I clicked 10 times on each query in Firefox 2.0 and Safari
2.0.4 (See HTML source for all code, markup, etc.) I recorded the
mode (most common value) and th
24 matches
Mail list logo
