Re: [IxDA Discuss] Content inventory link ID numbering conventions

2008-05-21 Thread Dante Murphy
I always use 0.0 for the Home page. If there is another state of the home page (logged in, or admin user, etc.) I might use 0.1 or 0.2. Sometimes I will also give a global page a 0.x number, like Search Results, since this doesn't belong to any content category. x.0 maps to a category page.

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Content inventory link ID numbering conventions

2008-05-21 Thread Scott McDaniel
I'm a bit green yet with actually producing this stuff myself, but Dante's method sounds like what I use. However, I am finding myself at a loss on how to treat global details, such as top navigation, footer, user login box, etc. when their level of detail requires a separate page. Right now I

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Content inventory link ID numbering conventions

2008-05-21 Thread Amy
I do content inventories much the same way as Dante does, it sounds like. The homepage is 0.0, the top-level category pages are 1.0, 2.0, and so on, and pages below those are numbered as children. I've gone as deep as five or six levels using this system, and it works fine, even if it leads to

Re: [IxDA Discuss] Content inventory link ID numbering conventions

2008-05-21 Thread Amy
I do content inventories much the same way as Dante does, it sounds like. The homepage is 0.0, the top-level category pages are 1.0, 2.0, and so on, and pages below those are numbered as children. I've gone as deep as five or six levels using this system, and it works fine, even if it leads to

[IxDA Discuss] Content inventory link ID numbering conventions

2008-05-20 Thread Elizabeth Parham
Hello! Not a very exciting query I'm afraid, but I'm hoping you can all help me clear up a little debate we've been having all day. * When doing a content inventory, is there a correct (standard) way to number the sections starting from the home page?* According to most sources [1] it appears to