Maria et al,
One of the big challenges is the fact that many assistive
technologies, like screen readers, are still catching up in terms of
their ability to communicate what is happening on RIA screens to
users (e.g., partial content updates VS full page reloads). Also,
keep in mind that a
Thanks for the links.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=36539
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this
In the end. I think many things that ajax sites do, are very very hard
to do right for screen readers. And in many cases, are pointless to do
for screen reader.
This is why I am a HUGE proponent of separate interfaces for screen
readers.
At the end of the day, you aren't doing interaction design
and then 6.0 is The Matrix
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Will Evans w...@semanticfoundry.comwrote:
Oh. And
5.0 The Singularity
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ...
You might want to take a look at webAIM.org (a good resource for
accessibility). There have been some discussions on Web 2.0/ajax/etc
in the email discussion group. Maybe search for terms like ajax
or ria or web 2.0 in the archives at
http://webaim.org/discussion/archives.php
Also some articles
Web 7.0 The Schismatrix: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schismatrix
On Dec 21, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Casey Edgeton wrote:
and then 6.0 is The Matrix
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Will Evans
w...@semanticfoundry.comwrote:
Oh. And
5.0 The Singularity
All your purchases could be automated. If it can't figure out that
you like to keep certain things on hand. (There would be sensors
either at the front door or in your pantry as well) You'll still be
able to parse lists of what you have bought in the past. And more
importantly, What is to stop it
Perhaps we are getting off track on the original question about
disability, but I think we will see aware sites well before we see
aware refrigerators. It may be easy for the fridge to know that the
milk is running low (RFID and weight sensor would take care of that),
that I always use milk (a
Oh. And
5.0 The Singularity
will evans
emotive architect
hedonic designer
w...@semanticfoundry.com
617.281.1281
twitter: semanticwill
aim: semanticwill
gtalk: wkevans4
skype: semanticwill
_
Sent via iPhone
On Dec 21, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Will Evans wkeva...@gmail.com
2.0 the social web
3.0 the semantic web
4.0 the self-aware web
will evans
emotive architect
hedonic designer
w...@semanticfoundry.com
617.281.1281
twitter: semanticwill
aim: semanticwill
gtalk: wkevans4
skype: semanticwill
_
Sent via iPhone
On Dec 21, 2008, at 1:52
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0
While wikipedia does make mention of ajax and other richer web
offerings as being part of many web 2.0 sites. It says just that. It
is a part of many web 2.0 sites. Not the definition of web 2.0.
2.0 sites, from the perspective of wikipedia, are what I said.
Ajax != web 2.0
1.0 = content by web authors.
2.0 = content by website users.
3.0 = constructs by users and software as a service.
So, for web 2.0 there shouldn't be any extra concerns for
disabilities, but accessibility on the web has been a joke for much
longer than the X.0 concept has
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:48 PM, William Brall dam...@earthlink.netwrote:
Ajax != web 2.0
1.0 = content by web authors.
2.0 = content by website users.
3.0 = constructs by users and software as a service.
according to whom?
i've heard numerous definitions of web 3.0, none of them
Hello folks,
talking about web 2.0 and its moving toward a 3.0 era, I've been questioning
myself about how web 2.0 has prompted accessibility problems by people with
disabilities. It seems to me, in fact, that disability matters are still solved
with classic solutions.
However, I think the
Maria,
You might like to take a look at some of the work Derek Featherstone has
been doing in this area. His presentation to Web Direction South in
September can be found here:
Hi Steve, I took a fast look at the links you sent me. Really
interesting examples, I'll keep an eye on these skilled guys, thank
you.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=36539
On 19 Dec 2008, at 10:48, Maria De Monte wrote:
Hello folks,
talking about web 2.0 and its moving toward a 3.0 era, I've been
questioning myself about how web 2.0 has prompted accessibility
problems by people with disabilities. It seems to me, in fact, that
disability matters are still
17 matches
Mail list logo
