Hi Scott,
Thank you for OGC's openness to discuss ideas for reviewing standardisation of
LiDAR and other point cloud data. I have informed our LiDAR colleagues to be in
contact with you directly to discuss ideas further . It is also good to know
that there will be Standards Openness ad hoc sess
Hi,
For pycsw, we started code review discussion during FOSS4G 2014 Code
Sprint, but the actual review happened within 2-3 weeks.
Best,
Angelos
On 03/06/2015 12:19 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
I completely understand Daniel, I think a "star" belittles the amount of
work (and operational change) i
I completely understand Daniel, I think a "star" belittles the amount of
work (and operational change) involved in meeting OSGeo's requirements.
If it helps I am not talking about diluting incubation, instead opening up
to more projects (by forgoing the requirement to have a mentor). All
projects
I think this is a good idea and I like the transparency. We might want
both a verbose and a compact presentation of their progress. For example
if you listed all the projects (like: one line for each) it would be
nice to be able to rank them or show what their progress is toward
completing thei
hm, what about replacing the anonymous stars by concrete fulfilments? A project
might earn fulfilments, such as "has PC", "successful code review", etc. All it
would require is to boil down the requirements into a 1-digit number of
sections, each one earning one named "star" then. My main argument
I think the idea would be that an "Incubated Project" would have meet
all the basic stars. Obviously the steps that get you to be "incubated"
are the same steps that a project have to achieve to get stars. It seems
like there are goals to get you to "incubated" and then goals to get you
to "gra
I'm not sure I like diluting the "Incubated Project" status by turning
it into a star rating in which incubated and non-incubated projects are
mixed.
Incubated projects have taken steps to review their code and adjust
their way to operate to meet several requirements, and just a set of
stars
I think this type of system makes a lot of sense especially if you tie
the achievement of stars to completing the various requirements of
incubation and graduation.
-Steve
On 3/5/2015 6:18 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
Bart,
that needs to be discussed but as example: yes, 1 star for current labs
Bart,
that needs to be discussed but as example: yes, 1 star for current labs, 4
stars for current incubated projects
čt 5. 3. 2015 v 12:16 odesílatel Bart van den Eijnden
napsal:
> Or you’re saying you want to address this with the stars system? So 1 star
> for existing labs projects for ins
Or you’re saying you want to address this with the stars system? So 1 star for
existing labs projects for instance?
Jody, as chair of the incubation committee, what’s your take on this?
Best regards,
Bart
> On 05 Mar 2015, at 11:51, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
>
> I don’t think you can put pr
Bart - the thread started as proposal for the new rating system of all
future (and current) OSGeo Projects
čt 5. 3. 2015 v 11:51 odesílatel Bart van den Eijnden
napsal:
> I don’t think you can put projects that have gone through incubation and
> the projects that still have to incubate at the sa
I don’t think you can put projects that have gone through incubation and the
projects that still have to incubate at the same level. But that’s my opinion
only.
Best regards,
Bart
> On 05 Mar 2015, at 11:18, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I think you are trying to find a term for somet
Guys,
I think you are trying to find a term for something, I would like to get
rid of. "OSGeo Project" is, what I would like to achieve for both - today's
projects and labs together under one hat.
Or anybody thinks completely different?
Just my $.02
J
čt 5. 3. 2015 v 9:08 odesílatel Suchith Ana
Yes, i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this.
Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
Suchith
From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
To: Vaclav Petras
Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subjec
Hi Davin,
you can use the semi-automatic classification plugin in QGIS to do a DOS
atmospheric correction (http://fromgistors.blogspot.com/ here you can find
descriptions as well as tutorials). This plugin is also available as a
VM so you do not have to use QGIS. But to use the plugin within QGIS
15 matches
Mail list logo
