Or you’re saying you want to address this with the stars system? So 1 star for existing labs projects for instance?
Jody, as chair of the incubation committee, what’s your take on this? Best regards, Bart > On 05 Mar 2015, at 11:51, Bart van den Eijnden <bart...@osgis.nl> wrote: > > I don’t think you can put projects that have gone through incubation and the > projects that still have to incubate at the same level. But that’s my opinion > only. > > Best regards, > Bart > >> On 05 Mar 2015, at 11:18, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepi...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Guys, >> >> I think you are trying to find a term for something, I would like to get rid >> of. "OSGeo Project" is, what I would like to achieve for both - today's >> projects and labs together under one hat. >> >> Or anybody thinks completely different? >> >> Just my $.02 >> J >> >> čt 5. 3. 2015 v 9:08 odesílatel Suchith Anand >> <suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk>> >> napsal: >> Yes, i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this. >> >> Vaclav - Is this ok for you? >> >> Suchith >> ________________________________________ >> From: Bart van den Eijnden [bart...@osgis.nl <mailto:bart...@osgis.nl>] >> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM >> To: Vaclav Petras >> Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org> >> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure >> >> I agree Community Projects is a confusing name. >> >> What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses. >> >> http://incubator.apache.org <http://incubator.apache.org/> >> >> Best regards, >> Bart >> >> On 04 Mar 2015, at 23:25, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com >> <mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com><mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com >> <mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Suchith Anand >> <suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk >> <mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk >> <mailto:suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote: >> Thanks Jeff. >> >> Though we had lots of discussions afterwards and continuing on this , we >> couldnt find any solution till now. So this might be a good opportunity to >> modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community Projects" >> to avoid confusion if that is acceptable to Vaclav, Jachym and others. Many >> thanks. >> >> Well, I'm not particularly fond of "Community Projects" as a name. Even >> mature FOSS projects are community projects in one way or the other. >> Unfortunately, I don't have other suggestion. >> >> Vaclav >> >> Suchith >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>> [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>>] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna >> [jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com >> <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com><mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com >> <mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com>>] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM >> To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>> >> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure >> >> (we are approaching 2 full years that this "labs" naming has been an >> issue and discussed[1]) >> >> Today, knowing how ingrained the term 'lab' is in the GeoForAll >> education network, maybe Jachym is correct that it is a good time to >> modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community >> Projects". >> >> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2013-June/000134.html >> <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2013-June/000134.html> >> >> -jeff >> >> >> >> >> On 2015-03-03 3:42 AM, Suchith Anand wrote: >> > Vaclav, >> > >> > Please accept my sincere apologies as it was my mistake that i did not >> > think on this when we started the ICA-OSGeo Labs initiative (so many >> > things were going on at that time!). >> > >> > In universities, we generally use the "Labs" term to refer to >> > infrastructure/people/facilities for a particular subject. For example >> > Botany Lab, Robotics Lab etc. And we wanted to make sure there is a >> > dedicated Open Source Geospatial Lab in universities worldwide (which >> > includes bringing together people from various disciplines, infrastructure >> > (the physical space) and facilities to make this happen. Also it is easier >> > to make use of the same terminology/structure of "Labs" which is widely >> > used in the university environment to get academics start the initiative >> > in their respective universities (also it is easier for them to convince >> > their higher management on a structure that is known to them than reinvent >> > a new term for this) . >> > >> > So it will very helpful for us if you can make use of new "OSGeo-projects" >> > and metioned star (or similar) rating system for the incubation as then >> > there is no confusion in the future. Many thanks for your consideration. >> > >> > Best wishes, >> > >> > Suchith >> > >> > ________________________________________ >> > From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> > <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> > <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>> >> > [discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> > <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> > <mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>>] On Behalf Of Jachym Cepicky >> > [jachym.cepi...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com><mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com>>] >> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM >> > To: Vaclav Petras >> > Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incuba...@lists.osgeo.org >> > <mailto:incuba...@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:incuba...@lists.osgeo.org >> > <mailto:incuba...@lists.osgeo.org>> >> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure >> > >> > Vašku, >> > >> > just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative "OSGeo-Labs" have to >> > change their name. >> > >> > My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- "labs" and "projects" >> > and start with new "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or similar) rating >> > system. >> > >> > Than for current OSGeo-Labs "OSGeo-project level 1" would make it (or >> > similar) >> > >> > Jachym >> > >> > po 2. 3. 2015 v 18:33 odesílatel Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com><mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com>><mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com><mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:wenzesl...@gmail.com>>>> napsal: >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepi...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com><mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com>><mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com><mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:jachym.cepi...@gmail.com>>>> wrote: >> > former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but >> > you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs >> > <http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs>) >> > >> > Hi Jachym, >> > >> > do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo Labs" >> > by something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo Research and >> > Educational laboratories which might be often shortened to OSGeo Labs, >> > although I prefer OSGeoRELs for writing. The mainling list is >> > ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is not such an issue since the term "Geo >> > for All" (http://www.geoforall.org/ <http://www.geoforall.org/>) is now >> > used more and more (well, the linked website as OSGeo Labs in the title >> > element). >> > >> > Thanks for taking this into consideration, >> > Vaclav >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> >> >> >> >> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee >> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. >> >> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this >> message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the >> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the >> University of Nottingham. >> >> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an >> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your >> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email >> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as >> permitted by UK legislation. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org><mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org >> <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> >> >> >> >> >> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee >> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. >> >> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this >> message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the >> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the >> University of Nottingham. >> >> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an >> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your >> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email >> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as >> permitted by UK legislation. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss> >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
