Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] final call friday - for software projects on beta website

Not too late it is only a beta, can you contact Jeffrey Johnson to get set up? On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:57 PM Julien Moquet wrote: > Hi Jody, > > I don't know if it is too late, but as we drop the Méta CRS project on the > OsgeoLive 11, may be can replace it by proj4 on the web site too. > I can

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Note the LocationTech badge is not showing correctly ... and there is still an open discussion about which badge to use for projects in incubation. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > Bingo. 1) is fixed. http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ ... > Hopefully they can add t

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Bingo. 1) is fixed. http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/ ... Hopefully they can add the default filter tomorrow. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > Just got off the phone with the vendor. They are going to do 2 things ASAP. > > 1) Add the badge. Its actually there, but

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] final call friday - for software projects on beta website

Hi Jody, I don't know if it is too late, but as we drop the Méta CRS project on the OsgeoLive 11, may be can replace it by proj4 on the web site too. I can help to do it (Kristian what do you think of ?). Regards, Julien. Le 9 août 2017 19:27, "Jody Garnett" a écrit : > Final call for projects

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Just got off the phone with the vendor. They are going to do 2 things ASAP. 1) Add the badge. Its actually there, but is not showing for some reason. 2) Add a filter in the megamenu for the type of project, and have the OSGeo filter checked initially so ONLY OSGeo projects are showing for now. Fr

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

I'm not sure at all, but it was a suggestion. Can someone open a ticket on the github so we can have a discussion there. There are 2 issues. 1) We need to be able to identify which are OSGeo incubated projects vs others. This is a technical issue that will get solved quickly (see my previous mai

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Are you sure ordering by rank is a good idea (whatever the rank is)? That leaves small projects behind... On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > I should also point out that it has been suggested that we have a way > to 'rank' projects in these pages somehow that indicates thei

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

I should also point out that it has been suggested that we have a way to 'rank' projects in these pages somehow that indicates their popularity ... for instance when we have a page of all OSGeo projects like the one linked below. Perhaps we can use the number of GitHub stars or some objective metri

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:43 AM, Moritz Lennert wrote: > On 16/08/17 15:29, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >> >> Note that several of these issues are on the list to be discussed with >> the vendor today. >> >> There is also the issue of actual OSGeo projects that simply havent >> responded to various req

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Helmut, We appreciate the gratitude. We've worked really hard on this site and want it to be something we can all be super proud of. We also, appreciate your concerns, indeed its now the very first item on the Agenda with our vendor today. I will report back in a few hours with our intended cours

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

On 16/08/17 15:29, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: Note that several of these issues are on the list to be discussed with the vendor today. There is also the issue of actual OSGeo projects that simply havent responded to various requests for input. I've had to just add them in myself so they are there an

[OSGeo-Discuss] pgRouting Release 2.4.2

Hello all: This new pgRouting micro release 2.4.2 fixes a couple of bugs, and modifications were done so that it can also work on postgreSQL 10. Testing was done using postgresSQL 10beta. Can be downloaded from [1] Documentation can be found on [2] regards. pgRouting Team [1] https://github.co

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Dear Marc, that I'm not misunderstood, I highly appreciate the very hard work for the website redesign and rebranding!! And as already mentioned in an earlier mail by me, I understand that the redesign is in beta. Citing Angelos in this thread: "I also think that we need to be *very careful* o

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

Thanks Helena can you report the issue on GitHub please? This is how we have been asked to communicate back to the crew doing the website. This week we are as a community working on content, thanks for adding your member profile. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:20 AM Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > I agree.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Note that several of these issues are on the list to be discussed with the vendor today. There is also the issue of actual OSGeo projects that simply havent responded to various requests for input. I've had to just add them in myself so they are there and can be hooked up to the choose a project w

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Thanks Maxi, Freeze time will indeed give us time to assemble all feedback, discuss and prioritise for further improvements. I was not even aware of the holiday season ;-) Enjoy! Kind regards, Marc Vloemans > Op 16 aug. 2017 om 09:10 heeft Massimiliano Cannata > het volgende geschreven: >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Marc I agree, great and huge work was done. Maybe a freezing period before of any public release/presentation would be good? We're not in a hurry... With more time review and discussion can run smoothly? Also, We're in the middle of the holiday season and also vacation time is limited :-) to answ

[OSGeo-Discuss] Gentle reminder reg: Project selection on the new website draft

Dear all, I feel that the "tail is wagging the dog" as they say. And we are on the brink of pushing valuable volunteers too far. Again. Your feed back on the website is needed, welcomed and enlisted, but please be it combined with some actionable way to go forward and a helping hand. The site

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

I agree. This issue has to be fixed. Angelos On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Venkatesh Raghavan < ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp> wrote: > On 8/16/2017 8:37 PM, Maria Antonia Brovelli wrote: > > I agree completely with Helena. It has to be fixed with the highest priority. > > Same here. > > Venk

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

On 8/16/2017 8:37 PM, Maria Antonia Brovelli wrote: I agree completely with Helena. It has to be fixed with the highest priority. Same here. Venka . Da: Discuss per conto di Helena Mitasova Inviato: mercoledì 16 agosto 2017 13:29 A: Paulo van Breugel Cc

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

>There is a very clear distinguishing of OSGeo projects on the website: As Paulo also already mentioned here on the list: directly going to http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/, there are no projects distinguished. That was the starting point of my discussion. I understand that the new webs

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

I agree completely with Helena. It has to be fixed with the highest priority. Have a good day, Maria Pay attention to this Special Issue and see if it is of interest by you: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijgi/special_issues/Geospatial_Big_Data_Urban_Studies ---

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

Jody, I have to go so I don't have time to write more but this needs to be fixed instantly to avoid massive backlash against the new website. After so much effort it would be heartbreaking to have a negative reaction just because we would be perceived as providing advertising platform for projects

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

On 8/16/17 9:32 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: We could ask the OSGeo live project what procedure they use, at the moment we have asked on the disc...@osgeo.org mailing list for open source projects to fill in a google form so we would have content to try out the website w

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

The other model we could go for is the requirements for an osgeo community module - to be geospatial, open source, and open to contributions. (Explcitly have a LICENSE and CONTRIBUTING file in their source repository). Thanks for the positive discussion Angelos and Helmut. If either of you can at

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

The OSGeo-Live project procedure to add a project is described here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Add_Project "We have an emphasis of quality, and we are space constrained on OSGeoLive and so are selective about what is included. Priority for selecting OSGeoLive projects to package is:

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Project selection on the new website draft

We could ask the OSGeo live project what procedure they use, at the moment we have asked on the disc...@osgeo.org mailing list for open source projects to fill in a google form so we would have content to try out the website with. There is a very clear distinguishing of OSGeo projects on the websi