Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Listing of projects at OSGeo web site: NASA WorldWind

We can work on the content from here and cut & paste from the public site. At least the listing is there now. On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote: > Jeffrey, > I'm sure it needs work, this is not my bailiwick. > Thanks for your concern and your

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Listing of projects at OSGeo web site: NASA WorldWind

Jeffrey, I'm sure it needs work, this is not my bailiwick. Thanks for your concern and your help. Open source is the only way this world can come together. With plenty of room for value-added being well paid for. Without the ^commons^ of open source for core technology, we will never know the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Listing of projects at OSGeo web site: NASA WorldWind

http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/esa-nasa-worldwind/ is up now. Thanks Patrick! On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote: > Jody, > > Not sure how to interpret your guidance. We’ve had our sleeves rolled up and > been pitching in without stop

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Listing of projects at OSGeo web site: NASA WorldWind

Jody, Not sure how to interpret your guidance. We’ve had our sleeves rolled up and been pitching in without stop for as long as open source virtual globes have existed. And I think ESA-NASA WorldWind is a bit beyond incubation, we are more of a breeder farm for geospatial apps. I am very sure

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Listing of projects at OSGeo web site: NASA WorldWind

We also made a call for projects on this discussion list. Patrick it would be great if you can list world wind on the website. You are of course welcome to apply as an community project or to enter the incubation program. As a volunteer driven organization we do not have the idea of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Listing of projects at OSGeo web site: NASA WorldWind

Patrick, you are welcome to include it. I can send you a login if you like. We made an open call on the projects list, but it seems many people are not on this list. On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) wrote: > It appears that one of the original

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Note the news section is intended for news related to a specific service provider. Its *not* doing this now, so its unclear. Can you file an issue about the search. Agree this should work for a project name here. On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote: >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] website rebranding feedback on discuss email list

Lets bring this up with the vendor at our meeting on wednesday. On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Is that date going to be okay with our contract Jeffrey? > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On 21 August 2017 at 17:14, Jeffrey Johnson

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

> 3) as mentioned in 2) it would be nice to have a place on our site to > list organizations that are NOT looking for work, nor are a GeoForAll > Lab, nor (yet) a sponsor or a partner (with a formal MOU). Perhaps > they are important contributors to a project and would like to be > listed

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] website rebranding feedback on discuss email list

Is that date going to be okay with our contract Jeffrey? -- Jody Garnett On 21 August 2017 at 17:14, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > Also, please feel free to contact me if you would like a login and > have not been given one yet. Again note these will be migrated to > OSGeo LDAP

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] website rebranding feedback on discuss email list

Also, please feel free to contact me if you would like a login and have not been given one yet. Again note these will be migrated to OSGeo LDAP accounts once we move the site to production. They are temporary during this content collection Phase. It has been suggested we have a freeze date so we

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Hi All, I think we are talking about several different issues here. Let me try to summarize. 1) JeffM is suggesting that we should *not* ask Service Providers what size they are in terms of number of employees to avoid 'alienating' them. I'm not sure I see how any would be alienated, but I dont

[OSGeo-Discuss] website rebranding feedback on discuss email list

I hope it is okay having these website/rebranding discussion on discuss - while it is a key activity for our foundation we do not wish to be in the way :) Please take feedback to the issue tracker: https://github.com/osgeo/osgeo/issues Keep in mind: - If you have a constructive idea to add

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Yeah does not appear to be hooked up yet the news - good note about the sponsors - we should add to the issue tracker if you have not done so already. Aside: When I made a partner page I could hook up some events, projects, resources. -- Jody Garnett On 21 August 2017 at 17:52, Jachym Cepicky

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Hi Jody, By alienating the smaller OSGeo companies in our new website, I don't see a benefit to OSGeo at all. Let us please all sizes of OSGeo companies, small and big. Yes this is tricky, for sure, even your initial message to Jachym shows a lot of what it could be like, if OSGeo suddenly

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

I already changed it from number to the size thing. This list was for support providers (since the website is about outreach looks at projects, local chapters and service providers). GeoForAll labs and academic / research outreach are in slightly different spot (we could cross link). See

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Jachym, to clarify: any organization should be able to advertise their services for an OSGeo project, whether they are a non-profit or a research entity or a private company etc. That is how my proposal avoids separating OSGeo organizations by size. -jeff On 2017-08-21 6:17 PM, Jachym

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Hi Jachym, Yes I agree, it is a slippery slope that once we/OSGeo decide that size is an important part of our organization (as you know, many other organizations separate their membership by size), it opens up so many other challenges. For that reason, I spoke up here to suggest that we

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Hi Jeff (all) currently, the page is listing "service providers" - it's project oriented (as providing services to projects) your proposal is shifting it little bit to "all organisations", not even service providing - but what is their releationship to the (osgeo) projects? - still, it would be

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

On 2017-08-21 5:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: For your page http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/service-providers/opengeolabs/ Is that a single consultant (you!) or a company? (or perhaps it is just a company with one person in it) Hi Jody, Regarding separating the OSGeo community by size, I

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] final call friday - for software projects on beta website

Hi, I made the requested changes there : http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/projects/proj4/?preview=true It's nearby the OsGeoLive docs. Regards, Julien. 2017-08-17 3:03 GMT+02:00 Jody Garnett : > Not too late it is only a beta, can you contact Jeffrey Johnson to get set

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

For your page http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/service-providers/opengeolabs/ Is that a single consultant (you!) or a company? (or perhaps it is just a company with one person in it) Are you happy with how that page is presented? Not sure about the news items (checking now they do not really let us

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

My bad, it is hard to keep up with so many amazing contributors :) -- Jody Garnett On 21 August 2017 at 12:45, Jachym Cepicky wrote: > afaik it was Vasile's overview > > just noting > > j > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, 17:59 Jody Garnett wrote: > >>

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

afaik it was Vasile's overview just noting j On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, 17:59 Jody Garnett wrote: > That is perfect Jachym; at least for the beta website the "quick review" > is the very few edit permissions we have handed out. I like how this > discussion is covering what

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo's GSoC 2017: final

And I'll like to thank you: great work! Sergio Acosta y Lara Departamento de Geomática Dirección Nacional de Topografía Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas URUGUAY (598)29157933 ints. 20329/20330 http://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/ De: Discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Non-precise framing can hurt the community

Hi, I'm all for promoting "as much free and open source software for geospatial" as possible on our web page. Our target is community outreach, to destroy borders, this IMHO is part of our vision and mission [1] OSGeo VisionEmpower everyone with open source geospatialOSGeo Mission Statement

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposal for the listing of projects in our new web site

Hi, just noting: there can be currently "Community projects" and "Other projects" on the new OSGeo web page I agree, being "official OSGeo Community projects" requires some rules and approval process IMHO the "new proposed rules" are ok, if you want just your project appear on OSGeo Web page as