Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Fwd: FOSS4G 2025 stage 2 vote results

2024-06-15 Thread Jonathan Moules via Discuss
onferences have solved this problem too; anyone know how? Cheers, Jonathan (Disclosure: I have no oar in any conference proposal; just a concerned citizen of the Earth, aghast at another couple thousand tons of CO2e being needlessly emitted.) On 2024-06-04 06:23, Vasile Craciunescu via

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Conference selection transparency (Was Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023)

2022-01-13 Thread Jonathan Moules via Discuss
suddenly does not play a role anymore when you score a good friend vs a hated enemy against a "list of requirements"? It might look transparent but is not the tiniest bit more fair. /-- / /Barend Köbben/ *From: *Discuss on behalf of Jonathan Moules via Discuss *O

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Conference selection transparency (Was Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023)

2022-01-13 Thread Jonathan Moules via Discuss
it: https://rfp360.com/rfp-weighted-scoring/ Best, Jonathan On 2022-01-13 11:43, Bruce Bannerman wrote: Jonathan, Do you have a suggestion as to how the process can be improved? Kind regards, Bruce Disclosure: I was a member of the LOC for FOSS4G-2009. I personally don’t have a problem with t

[OSGeo-Discuss] Conference selection transparency (Was Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023)

2022-01-13 Thread Jonathan Moules via Discuss
opriety, I'm highlighting we have no way of knowing there's no impropriety. Hence my claim as to a lack of transparency; the votes are opaque. Cheers, Jonathan On 2022-01-13 07:35, María Arias de Reyna wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:50 PM Jonathan Moules via Discuss wrote: On

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023

2022-01-12 Thread Jonathan Moules via Discuss
. Future FOSS4Gs will probably all part virtual and in-person. Note this is my personal opinion. Mike -- Michael Smith US Army Corps / Remote Sensing GIS Center On 1/12/22, 10:28 AM, "Discuss on behalf of Iván Sánchez Ortega via Discuss" wrote:

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023

2022-01-12 Thread Jonathan Moules via Discuss
al environmental costs. Seems like something worth discussing, Cheers, Jonathan On 2022-01-12 12:57, Vasile Craciunescu wrote: Dear OSGeo/FOSS4G Community, Although the fight against COVID-19 is not over yet, we need to think and act to keep the FOSS4G spirit alive and to have our beloved

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Soil Map

2020-12-04 Thread Jonathan Moules
The ISRIC have something - https://www.isric.org/explore - They seem to be the international soil people and have a "World Data Centre for Soils". (They even have a FOSS4G t-shirt in their team photo!) (Heading slightly offtopic, but they have a nifty Virtual Soil Museum too - https://wsm.isri

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Free licensed alternative to ESRI map fonts

2020-07-25 Thread Jonathan Moules
t) (and I learnt today that these are called "dingbats"). Cheers, Jonathan On 2020-07-24 01:36, Nyall Dawson wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 23:38, Jody Garnett wrote: This discussion starts to get into the value, it is a lot of work to gather up these original or alternate sources ...

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Analysis] Geospatial server deployment statistics

2020-06-05 Thread Jonathan Moules
> Interesting so some of the 5000+ WMS services attributed to geoserver may be mapserver instances? Extremely unlikely. Multiple fingerprints were used for each piece of software. For GeoServer I have 9 different fingerprints any one of which is almost always unique to GeoServer, for MapServer

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Analysis] Geospatial server deployment statistics

2020-06-05 Thread Jonathan Moules
over two years (although with much less coverage of services at the start of that). I'll let you know if/when I get around to it. Cheers, Jonathan On 2020-06-05 20:45, Jody Garnett wrote: Thanks for the quick feedback :) Thanks for the feedback. You're very welcome to cross-post

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Analysis] Geospatial server deployment statistics

2020-06-05 Thread Jonathan Moules
re would be big resource savings - it's only around 120kB uncompressed. Cheers, Jonathan On 2020-06-05 16:30, Jody Garnett wrote: That is really interesting Jonathan, if you are open to cross posting it would be nice to reference this from a GeoServer blog post. I especially liked the fing

[OSGeo-Discuss] [Analysis] Geospatial server deployment statistics

2020-06-04 Thread Jonathan Moules
lcome (on or off list). Cheers, Jonathan ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] R: 2019 OSGeo UN Committee Educational Challenge

2019-05-19 Thread Jonathan Moules
ate and pick inexperienced. Age should not be a factor, only experience. Cheers, Jonathan On 2019-05-19 20:03, Maria Antonia Brovelli wrote: Thanks for your comment.  I have a different opinion. People with more than 40 years can apply. Moeover the scores will be compensated by their experie

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2019 OSGeo UN Committee Educational Challenge

2019-05-19 Thread Jonathan Moules
I've just taken a look at this and noticed this line as one of the evaluation criteria: > Proposer’s age (20 if <= 40 years old; 0 if >40 years old): 20 (max) When did explicit age discrimination (i.e. ageism) become acceptable? It seems to run counter to the OSGeo Goal of: "be a welcoming a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] good article on open source considerations

2019-04-05 Thread Jonathan Moules
more overlap than the article suggests. Sure ArcGIS is much slicker than QGIS and has all the great integration/uniformity etc that the article talks about, but for support, I'll pick QGIS every time. If you *really* want something fixed, you can still pay someone to do it (or do it yourself

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G2019 Bucharest: registration open

2019-01-14 Thread Jonathan Moules
For those seeking a more sustainable means of getting to Bucharest rather than flying, there are also a considerable number of ridiculously cheap sleeper trains, including direct from Austria (Vienna), Hungary (including Budapest), Moldova (on original Soviet rolling stock!), Bulgaria, and Turk

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Changes (and proposed changes) regarding the Code of Conduct

2018-12-12 Thread Jonathan Moules
e the rules. @Maria - a concern with having this conversation on the CoC list is that that's a self-selecting group and there's a non-zero chance it can end up as an echo chamber. How many of the folks who have put forth an opinion in this thread on /discuss are also on /CoC for instan

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Changes (and proposed changes) regarding the Code of Conduct

2018-12-10 Thread Jonathan Moules
to always assume good faith if possible. Humans may be the species with the most complex communication on the planet, but that doesn't mean we don't fail often. @Ben - Thanks for sharing World Human Rights day. I'm a long time fan of the UNDHR! Cheers, Jonathan On 2018-12-09 1

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Marketing Committee 2019 Goals and Support

2018-09-25 Thread Jonathan Moules
bsite despite that website being hosted on OsGeo: https://mapguide.osgeo.org/ There's also a lot of link-rot on that website, including to OSGeo-wide stuff (Try the OSGeo Community links on the right - several 404's) so they may need some help in maintaining/updating it. Cheers, Jonath

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] SQLite databases locked

2018-09-25 Thread Jonathan Moules
It turns out there's a MapGuide list - you may find it useful to ask there: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users On 2018-09-25 18:30, Jonathan Moules wrote: Hi Meinrad, I don't know anything about MapGuide, but I know a little about SQLite, so in lieu of a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] SQLite databases locked

2018-09-25 Thread Jonathan Moules
SGeo Community" - https://mapguide.osgeo.org/) Cheers, Jonathan On 2018-09-24 17:03, mwk5...@gmx.ch wrote: Hi, I'm using SQLite FDO and have the problem that the databases get locked by MapGuide Open Source. If I want to replace a database, I need to restart the MapGuide service fir

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Diversity in FOSS4G

2018-08-12 Thread Jonathan Moules
That's the thing: they jump into that conclusion with biased prejudices. Right now, we don't have equal opportunity anywhere in the world. Not women, not PoC. You are proving me right, they are biased! https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/169/Strawman-Fallacy Th

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Diversity in FOSS4G

2018-08-12 Thread Jonathan Moules
hing else will be a dis-service to people of both genders. On 2018-08-12 10:14, María Arias de Reyna wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Jonathan Moules wrote: Let me tell you something: having legal rights doesn't mean you have equal opportunities. Those studies are falling in

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Diversity in FOSS4G

2018-08-11 Thread Jonathan Moules
a point I maintain), and I question the unfounded assertion that 50% females in the industry/speakers/etc is something that is feasible given the research on female career preferences. I'll leave it at that. Cheers, Jonathan ___ Discu

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Diversity in FOSS4G

2018-08-11 Thread Jonathan Moules
11 14:29, María Arias de Reyna wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Jonathan Moules wrote: Once we have a 50% of speakers that are women (even 40%), we can start saying that having a full keynoter line of women speakers is no diversity. At the risk of asking a question that I know isn't

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Diversity in FOSS4G

2018-08-11 Thread Jonathan Moules
selves). Personally I seek to be an egalitarian - I'm a big fan of equality - which is why I pointed out some of the various other forms of diversity as they so often get forgotten (age especially). On 2018-08-11 12:10, María Arias de Reyna wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 12:35 PM,

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Diversity in FOSS4G

2018-08-11 Thread Jonathan Moules
(Adj), "Showing a great deal of variety; very different." By that definition, neither have gender diversity, both have racial diversity (Asia's more-so), and both have little age diversity. Cheers, Jonathan On 2018-08-09 10:43, María Arias de Reyna wrote: I agree this is a good

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] open repository for general research GIS data ?

2018-04-02 Thread Jonathan Moules
n being able to reliably and automatically find it. Cheers, Jonathan On 2018-03-28 14:11, karsten wrote: Dear All, I just had a colleague ask me about open data repositories for GIS files. Despite knowing the usual suspects such as OSM, GeoWiki, Natural earth data , Global administrative areasand

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] (no subject)

2017-03-29 Thread Jonathan Moules
eryone would benefit. (Or it could reduce taxes for everyone in the UK by about 10p a person per year! :-) ). Cheers, Jonathan (Disclaimer - guesswork in the above; don't cite me.) On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:38:59 +0100 Luí­s Moreira de Sousa<luis.de.so...@protonmail.ch> wrote

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?

2017-03-27 Thread Jonathan Moules
ublic figures) for regular examples). Cheers, Jonathan On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 16:38:44 + Mateusz Loskot<mate...@loskot.net> wrote On 25 March 2017 at 13:01, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> wrote: > Il 25/03/2017 12:56, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: > >> They

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?

2017-03-27 Thread Jonathan Moules
lieve they're fairly toothless As to "business ethics" - that's a clearcut oxymoron if ever I've seen one. Cheers, Jonathan On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:17:40 + Suchith Anand<suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote My query was if the term Open can b

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Geo4All - Empowering academics and educators globally - requesting colleagues to share Geo4All ideas at Geography Awareness Week

2016-08-17 Thread Jonathan Moules
and open" for the purposes of the current definition as used by the OSGeo. Whether the OSGeo definition (or by extension the OSI one) is correct is a question that's beyond the scope of my reply. :-) Cheers, Jonathan On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:00:38 +0100 Munich Orientation Co

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Geo4All] National level strategy for Open Principles in Geospatial - next steps

2016-07-06 Thread Jonathan Moules
et a few students to go through them and try and figure out which are using Open Source software and contact them directly. Cheers, Jonathan On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 15:35:11 +0100 Suchith Anand<suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote Hi Cameron, Thanks for this. I have

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 3D Satellite Models

2016-06-24 Thread Jonathan Moules
opment seems to have stopped though. Cheers, Jonathan On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:05:12 +0100 Hogan<patrick.ho...@nasa.gov> wrote Markus, Thanks for the heads up! Very nice, and yes we are aware of GPredict. We still think JSatTrak, with its 3D virtual globe experience, has somet

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Inputs invited for "The need for National level strategy for Open Principles in Geospatial"

2016-05-31 Thread Jonathan Moules
: https://data.gov.uk/data/openspending-report/index (maybe get a student to do some scraping?) Local government is harder without asking each authority individually and/or finding their pages then scraping them. Open Data doesn't mean Easy Data. :-/ Cheers, Jonathan ___

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G

2016-05-28 Thread Jonathan Moules
ited grant funds for a delegate in say North America may be to wait for 2017's offering, and award the grant then, rather than funding a trans-Atlantic flight. Just another 2p of thoughts. Cheers, Jonathan On 24/05/2016 11:38, Benoit Fournier wrote: Hi Johan and all, I have been

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Cannot Add a Feature to QGIS 2.14.2 - Essen

2016-05-24 Thread Jonathan Moules
Hi Stuart, You'd probably be better served by asking this on the QGIS user list - https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Cheers, Jonathan On Tue, 24 May 2016 06:08:54 +0100 Stuart Stapely<stu...@waterlossmanagement.com.au> wrote Hi guys I hope you can

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G

2016-05-12 Thread Jonathan
ot;gala", but things like the pens (or even supply them), or maybe the meals ("this food sponsored by GeoWorldSpatialMapGlobalGIS Inc"). A counter point to my own argument though - the increasing delegate count shows that plenty of people (or their companies in many cases) are

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

2016-05-09 Thread Jonathan Moules
OSGeo accept such a model where it's desired. Cheers, Jonathan On Mon, 09 May 2016 12:39:14 +0100 Peter Baumann<p.baum...@jacobs-university.de> wrote Hi Marc, I understand your position, and I appreciate your thoughtful deliberations. Still, these are all on meta level,

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] Should OSGeo accept "benevolent dictator" projects into OSGeo?

2016-05-06 Thread Jonathan Moules
Wikipedia has a page full of Open Source Benevolent Dictators For Life (BDFL) for very successful projects (Linux, Ruby, Python, Blender, Django, OpenBSD, Drupal, WordPress, Perl) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benevolent_Dictator_for_Life I'm not sure how many have foundational approval, or ha

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-10 Thread Jonathan Moules
Hi Even, I'm not averse to the notion, but given the mixed/tepid response to this email thread, it doesn't seem like something the community has any particular desire for. Cheers, Jonathan On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:18:32 + Even Rouault<even.roua...@spatial

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Jonathan Moules
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:19 + Daniel Morissette<dmorisse...@mapgears.com> wrote On 2016-03-08 8:37 AM, Jonathan Moules wrote: > > Looking at the participant list, that Paris code-sprint entailed at > least 10 transatlan

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go

2016-03-08 Thread Jonathan Moules
tion. A quick search doesn't find any sort of ethical/green/social-responsibility policy on OSGeo's pages... Cheers, Jonathan (p.s. excellent use of "anchorite" - I can't say I've seen that word before!) On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:19:15 + Oliver Courtin<olivier.c

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Munich Orientation Convention, Mapcodes, and All the Rest

2015-07-30 Thread Jonathan Moules
place. I don’t know what the solution is, but it doesn’t seem like MGRS would be the panacea you put forth, just like I suspect there are problems with the other systems. But I do agree with you and others that it’s an important subject. Kind regards, Jonathan From: discuss-boun

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Discuss Digest, Vol 103, Issue 20

2015-07-27 Thread Jonathan Moules
a while to find out that code because I don't know what they call them in Russia (it's not a "zip code" or a "post code") (seems there are lots of terms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_code#Terms ). Perhaps this problem could benefit from input from th

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Discuss Digest, Vol 103, Issue 20

2015-07-27 Thread Jonathan Moules
eir primary design goal is ease-of-use by the general public. Cheers, Jonathan -Original Message- From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Steve Swazee Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 12:10 AM To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [OSG

RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Finding an OSGEO-related job in London

2009-10-15 Thread Jonathan Boylan
although am sure there must be a few pockets of usage in some of the bigger companies/organisations feel free to drop your cv to us and we'll see if there is a fit with our needs.worth taking a look at www.agi.org.uk as well.. hth Jonathan -Original Message