ail.com>, ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp,
> hmit...@ncsu.edu
> Cc: OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>, Sandro Santilli <
> s...@kbt.io>
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Non-precise framing can hurt the community
>
> Dear Venka, Dear Helena, Dear Marc, Dear OSGeo C
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Non-precise framing can hurt the community
Dear Venka, Dear Helena, Dear Marc, Dear OSGeo Community,
I'm some kind of surprised about the reactions and long threads about my
question yesterday.
Just back from a long walk along a nice alpine river where I had time to
contemp
el...@web.de>, "Marc Vloemans"
> <marcvloema...@gmail.com>, hmit...@ncsu.edu, ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
> Cc: "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>, "Sandro Santilli"
> <s...@kbt.io>
> Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Non-precise
d regards
> Helmut
>
>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 19. August 2017 um 00:54 Uhr
> Von: "Jody Garnett" <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
> An: "Helmut Kudrnovsky" <hel...@web.de>, "Jeffrey Johnson" <
> ortel...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "OSGeo Discussions
.de>, "Jeffrey Johnson" <ortel...@gmail.com>
Cc: "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>, "Sandro Santilli"
<s...@kbt.io>
Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Non-precise framing can hurt the community
Sorry I could not focus on this important conversat
t;
> marcvloema...@gmail.com>, hmit...@ncsu.edu, ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
> Cc: "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>, "Sandro Santilli" <
> s...@kbt.io>
> Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Non-precise framing can hurt the community
>
> Please
t;
An: "Helmut Kudrnovsky" <hel...@web.de>, "Marc Vloemans"
<marcvloema...@gmail.com>, hmit...@ncsu.edu, ragha...@media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
Cc: "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>, "Sandro Santilli"
<s...@kbt.io>
Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-
Please keep asking questions. It's healthy and how we (try to) arrive at
consensus.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 17:13 Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
> Dear Venka, Dear Helena, Dear Marc, Dear OSGeo Community,
>
> I'm some kind of surprised about the reactions and long threads about my
>
Dear Venka, Dear Helena, Dear Marc, Dear OSGeo Community,
I'm some kind of surprised about the reactions and long threads about my
question yesterday.
Just back from a long walk along a nice alpine river where I had time to
contemplate about it. Therefore it will be a personal and some kind of
@Helmut et all,
Thanks for another opportunity to give the community more insights in what
LocationTech (the Eclipse Industry Working Group for spatially aware software)
entails and how it relates to OSGeo!
We help co-develop and co-promote OSGeo projects in general (including
GPL-projects!)
Not accepting them due to our particular membership requirements does not mean
we are 'against' GPL.
Now, I turn my attention back to the plenary close of FOSS4G in Boston, the end
of a fantastic, fruitful and beyond all; inclusive gathering of the tribes.
Wish you were here!
Kind regards,
Dear Mark,
> We (Eclipse Foundation -LocationTech) are 'not against it' ! I repeat; not
> againstdid I mention 'not'?
>
> GPL is approved by OSI, just like the EPL. We are on the same team. The word
> 'against' suggests we are at odds with each other over this. Which we are
> not,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:53:47PM -0400, Marc Vloemans wrote:
> GPL is approved by OSI, just like the EPL. We are on the same team. The word
> 'against' suggests we are at odds with each other over this. Which we are
> not, never have been and never will be.
Do you accept GPL covered software
Dear Sandro,
We (Eclipse Foundation -LocationTech) are 'not against it' ! I repeat; not
againstdid I mention 'not'?
GPL is approved by OSI, just like the EPL. We are on the same team. The word
'against' suggests we are at odds with each other over this. Which we are not,
never have
14 matches
Mail list logo