f P Kishor [punk.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:14 a.m.
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Representing Places With Intelligent URLs
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Geoff Hay wrote:
> Hi
> The knowledge you are trying to encode should be represented
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Geoff Hay wrote:
> Hi
> The knowledge you are trying to encode should be represented as associations
> between individuals (this place contains that place etc) and concepts (city,
> park, post office delivery area, etc) (as in OWL) rather than a URI scheme
> (see
Hi
The knowledge you are trying to encode should be represented as associations
between individuals (this place contains that place etc) and concepts (city,
park, post office delivery area, etc) (as in OWL) rather than a URI scheme (see
Geonames). The basic idea is to represent places in a way
Allen,
You need the Centimeter stuff to realize that something moved over the two
years. Besides, that just ends up being a re-projection in the end anyway.
:c)
bobb
>>> Allan Doyle wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Bob Basques wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm a long time address database
On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Bob Basques wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm a long time address database creation/maintenance/re-creation fiend
> myself.
>
> I've also been working with the USNG (MGRS) gridding system the last few
> years, and need to at least suggest the idea of
> using a Gridding syste
All,
I'm a long time address database creation/maintenance/re-creation fiend myself.
I've also been working with the USNG (MGRS) gridding system the last few years, and need to at least suggest the idea of
using a Gridding system to locate things. This idea is not nbew, but USNG usage has gai
The geonames ontology looks like it might work for me. I'll read it over
tomorrow.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Landon
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:45 PM, "Ian Turton" wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Christopher Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:18:47PM -070
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Christopher Schmidt
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:18:47PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> "All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventing RDF" .. ?
>
> That was actually my first thought when I saw this: "Hey look,
> someone else reinventing RDFa!
Chris,
I'll look into rdfa. Thanks for the suggestion.
Landon
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:37 PM, "Christopher Schmidt"
wrote:
>
Warning:
Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects
including translation and transmission errors. If the reader i
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:18:47PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> "All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventing RDF" .. ?
That was actually my first thought when I saw this: "Hey look,
someone else reinventing RDFa!" :)
Seriously, I say this with a bit of knowledge; I mean, after a
On 2010-10-05, at 5:32 PM, P Kishor wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Landon Blake wrote:
>> could be good for 80% of the world.
>
> I wouldn’t go that far... perhaps for 20% of the world, maybe perhaps.
>
> I personally know at least a couple of fairly large swaths of this
> world where
hone Number: (209) 992-0658
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Schmidt
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 5:12 PM
> To: OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Landon Blake wrote:
> could be good for 80% of the world.
I wouldn’t go that far... perhaps for 20% of the world, maybe perhaps.
I personally know at least a couple of fairly large swaths of this
world where no such (or any) structure would fly.
--
Puneet Kisho
-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 5:19 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Representing Places With Intelligent URLs
"All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventin
ne Number: (209) 946-0268
Cell Phone Number: (209) 992-0658
-Original Message-
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Christopher Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 5:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE
"All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventing RDF" .. ?
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Christopher Schmidt
wrote:
> How about the fact that although some counties contain cities,
> some cities exist over the border between multiple counties, and
> other counties are *contained
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:03:14PM -0700, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
> > ...it would be easy to determine what the URL for...
>
> Alas, it is not clear to me that, even within the US, there is a universally
> recognized canonicalization of the place name hierarchy, much less the names
> themselves
> ...it would be easy to determine what the URL for...
Alas, it is not clear to me that, even within the US, there is a universally
recognized canonicalization of the place name hierarchy, much less the names
themselves.
For example, you refer to "california", as opposed to "state_of_california
18 matches
Mail list logo
