...@lists.osgeo.org> per conto di Ben Caradoc-Davies
<b...@transient.nz>
Inviato: lunedì 23 ottobre 2017 02:24
A: Vasile Craciunescu; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Oggetto: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] withdrawal from Board election
Vasile,
+1. You have my full support for this course of action.
Vasile,
+1. You have my full support for this course of action.
I am not aware of any voting system that permits withdrawal of a
candidate during the voting period. In my view, withdrawal during the
voting period is out of order. Should the candidate be elected, the
candidate may then
Well, I have been following this election's discussion and refrained from
adding to the noise. I hoped as a group of *volunteers* everything would be
settled with some pragmatism. Didn't happen.
Jeff please do not walk away. There are many elected/appointed
watchers/officials of the rules (board,
+1
Bravo Vicky!
Very well said. Thank you.
Kind regards,
Bruce
> On 22 Oct 2017, at 23:45, Vicky Vergara wrote:
>
> Open letter to Jeff McKenna.
>
> Dear Jeff:
>
> I am so sad about the situation that led you to ask about the withdrawal.
>
> All of us, OSGeo
On 10/22/17 9:00 PM, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
This could all be solved by having a vote system that allows voters to
modify their votes at any point up to the closing time.
Can that be done with the current software system? Can it be
retrospectively done with the current *election*? :)
No.
ile, Board, you have my fullest compassion.
>
> http://arnulf.us
> Mind your business
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: n...@nikosalexandris.net
> Datum: 22.10.17 18:18 (GMT+01:00)
> An: vas...@geo-spatial.org
> Cc: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> Betr
* seven [2017-10-22 18:33:57 +0200]:
After reading latest posts I agree that canceling the elections might
open Pandora's box (which is not going to happen because we are all
grown up and work towards the same goal, right?)
Gruess Dich Arnulf,
But of course it's not going
: Sunday, October 22, 2017 9:34 AM
To: n...@nikosalexandris.net; vas...@geo-spatial.org
Cc: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] withdrawal from Board election
After reading latest posts I agree that canceling the elections might open
Pandora's box (which is not going to happen because we
) An: vas...@geo-spatial.org Cc:
discuss@lists.osgeo.org Betreff: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] withdrawal from Board
election
Dear Vasile,
for what is worth, from my short experience as a CRO for GRASS' PSC elections
last year, and I mean my readings on and off in trying to be useful for the
process,
I
Dear Vasile,
for what is worth, from my short experience as a CRO for GRASS' PSC elections
last year, and I mean my readings on and off in trying to be useful for the
process,
I think it is not useful to cancel running elections. Nor it is to accept any
withdrawal during the process.
The
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] withdrawal from Board election
Barry,
I fully agree with you that a complete restart is the fairest way to go.
However, people are getting really tired with this subject and some
already unsubscribe from this mailing list. Also, not sure if this
should be my call or the
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On 22 Oct 2017, at 17:17, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
>
> I agree with Barry that this is the only way forward, a new ballot.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bart
>
>> On 22-10-17 15:33, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> My proposal to the Board and the
I agree with Barry that this is the only way forward, a new ballot.
Best regards,
Bart
On 22-10-17 15:33, Barry Rowlingson wrote:
My proposal to the Board and the OSGeo charter members is to leave the
list as it is and make sure that the people that did not vote yet are
aware
>Barry,
>
>I fully agree with you that a complete restart is the fairest way to go.
>However, people are getting really tired with this subject and some
>already unsubscribe from this mailing list. Also, not sure if this
>should be my call or the board should formally decide on this. Probably
Concur with Steven. I think we just go forward with the election.
Michael Smith
OSGeo Treasurer
> On Oct 22, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Steven Feldman wrote:
>
> I don't think there is a basis for cancelling the election and restarting
>
> We should continue with the voting.
Aan: Barry Rowlingson
CC: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] withdrawal from Board election
Barry,
I fully agree with you that a complete restart is the fairest way to go.
However, people are getting really tired with this subject and some already
unsubscribe from this mailing
I don't think there is a basis for cancelling the election and restarting
We should continue with the voting.
With the volume of mail on this list, there is little chance of any charter
member not knowing that Jeff has withdrawn
Leave Jeff's name on the ballot and allow those who would like
Barry,
I fully agree with you that a complete restart is the fairest way to go.
However, people are getting really tired with this subject and some
already unsubscribe from this mailing list. Also, not sure if this
should be my call or the board should formally decide on this. Probably
+ 1 for Maxi.
Please do not accept Jeff's withdrawal, I hope he can join the board again
and go on with all the things he did in the past!
Silvia
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Vicky Vergara wrote:
> Open letter to Jeff McKenna.
>
>
> Dear Jeff:
>
>
> I am so sad
+ Maxi
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Kari Salovaara wrote:
> I fully agree with Maxi and I stay in my voting.
> This discussion has been below any ... and due only some single persons
> who are looking only for their personal benefits.
>
> Kari
>
>
>
+1
Moritz
Le 21 octobre 2017 23:20:03 GMT+02:00, Massimiliano Cannata
a écrit :
>Dear Jeff,
>I hope your withdrawal is not accepted.
>
>With a community of hundreds of charter members I wouldn't care so much
>of
>the respectable opinion of a couple of people and
I fully agree with Maxi and I stay in my voting.
This discussion has been below any ... and due only some single persons
who are looking only for their personal benefits.
Kari
Massimiliano Cannata kirjoitti 22.10.2017 klo 0:20:
> Dear Jeff,
> I hope your withdrawal is not accepted.
>
> With a
On 22 October 2017 at 07:20, Massimiliano Cannata
wrote:
> Dear Jeff,
> I hope your withdrawal is not accepted.
>
+1 from me too.
Nyall
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
+ 1 Maxi, Bruce.
Venka
On 10/22/2017 7:03 AM, Bruce Bannerman wrote:
+1 Maxi.
I’m very sorry to see this Jeff.
As a community, we need to look closely at what we allowed to happen during
this process.
We cannot afford to chase away very talented and passionate people. Jeff is but
one of
+1 Maxi.
I’m very sorry to see this Jeff.
As a community, we need to look closely at what we allowed to happen during
this process.
We cannot afford to chase away very talented and passionate people. Jeff is but
one of them.
I have not been impressed by our actions.
Bruce
> On 22 Oct 2017,
Dear Jeff,
I hope your withdrawal is not accepted.
With a community of hundreds of charter members I wouldn't care so much of
the respectable opinion of a couple of people and I would let the board
take the responsibility to take a decision.
I don't see anything irregular in your participation,
Hi Jeff,
This must have been a tough call for you. I think you have made the
right call.
I also stand by my previous statements about your great personal
characteristics and contributions to OSGeo:
On 13/10/17 6:32 am, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>
> I really like and respect Jeff. He has
With all due respect, withdrawing after voting has started isn't fair to
those who have already voted.
I have been intentionally staying out of the melee that has been the
discuss list lately, but in my opinion this is just not right.
With full appreciation for and recognition of all the good
Dear CRO,
Please accept my withdrawal from the Board election. I am sorry to
cause all of the problems so clearly explained by so many here publicly
this election.
I wish to take the time now to thank all of the candidates for
volunteering their time for the OSGeo community.
Yours,
29 matches
Mail list logo