Allen,
You need the Centimeter stuff to realize that something moved over the two
years. Besides, that just ends up being a re-projection in the end anyway.
:c)
bobb
Allan Doyle afdo...@mit.edu wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Bob Basques wrote:
All,
I'm a long time address
[punk.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 7 October 2010 10:14 a.m.
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Representing Places With Intelligent URLs
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Geoff Hay geoffrey@otago.ac.nz wrote:
Hi
The knowledge you are trying to encode should be represented
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:03:14PM -0700, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
...it would be easy to determine what the URL for...
Alas, it is not clear to me that, even within the US, there is a universally
recognized canonicalization of the place name hierarchy, much less the names
themselves.
All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventing RDF .. ?
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Christopher Schmidt
crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote:
How about the fact that although some counties contain cities,
some cities exist over the border between multiple counties, and
other
[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Christopher Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 5:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Representing Places With Intelligent URLs
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:03:14PM -0700, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
...it would be easy
-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 5:19 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Representing Places With Intelligent URLs
All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventing RDF
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Landon Blake lbl...@ksninc.com wrote:
could be good for 80% of the world.
I wouldn’t go that far... perhaps for 20% of the world, maybe perhaps.
I personally know at least a couple of fairly large swaths of this
world where no such (or any) structure would fly.
-0268
Cell Phone Number: (209) 992-0658
-Original Message-
From: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 5:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] RE: Representing
On 2010-10-05, at 5:32 PM, P Kishor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Landon Blake lbl...@ksninc.com wrote:
could be good for 80% of the world.
I wouldn’t go that far... perhaps for 20% of the world, maybe perhaps.
I personally know at least a couple of fairly large swaths of this
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:18:47PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventing RDF .. ?
That was actually my first thought when I saw this: Hey look,
someone else reinventing RDFa! :)
Seriously, I say this with a bit of knowledge; I mean, after all,
Chris,
I'll look into rdfa. Thanks for the suggestion.
Landon
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Christopher Schmidt crschm...@crschmidt.net
wrote:
Warning:
Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects
including translation and transmission
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Christopher Schmidt
crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:18:47PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
All attempts to construct simple ontologies end up reinventing RDF .. ?
That was actually my first thought when I saw this: Hey look,
someone else
The geonames ontology looks like it might work for me. I'll read it over
tomorrow.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Landon
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Ian Turton ijtur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Christopher Schmidt
crschm...@crschmidt.net wrote:
On
13 matches
Mail list logo
