Just installed Net-UDAP, but the discover routine crashes:
$ svn co http://projects.robinbowes.com/svn/Net-UDAP/branches/1.0.x
$ scripts/udap_shell.pl
UDAP> discover
info: *** Broadcasting adv_discovery message to MAC address
00:00:00:00:00:00 on 255.255.255.255
info: adv_discovery respo
Yes I still buy stuff , I've found Bandcamp to be a great resource .
and on this forum there is a "what are you listening to rigth now" tread
that is great . In general the music sub forum here is filled with great
ideas .
And I use spotify and play some distant but very musical friends
playlist
Well, I'm right handed, and kind of born with two left hands. ;)
I suck at soldering things, and lose patience quickly, so I'd prefer
something either really simple to build (crafting a jack cable with a
couple components should be okay) or ready to use.
Thank you anyway! :)
Now, if DIY is your
pippin wrote:
> I think that would work but it's still quite a different product. We
> would see a way to use that to integrate it with the "traditional"
> Squeezebox system (using LMS as a server while still driving the player
> through the ickStream protocol) but it would still be a different
>
I think that would work but it's still quite a different product. We
would see a way to use that to integrate it with the "traditional"
Squeezebox system (using LMS as a server while still driving the player
through the ickStream protocol) but it would still be a different
product and probably not
garym wrote:
> But this may be a case of BetaMax vs VHS. The best approach doesn't
> always "win".
Indeed. Except the difference here is that there are enthusiasts still
updating the open source software and it works on a variety of hardware,
so the chance of survival is good, but I doubt it wi
Hello Squeezebox community!
I have been a huge supporter and user of Squeezebox for 6 or 7 years
now. Although I never post anything, I have been to the forums many
times to get help. It is truly a great community and I thought it would
be a great place to get some feedback on a business idea I a
isn't that because the Sonos has no equivelant of LMS to downsample?
SB environment almost doesn't care what the player can do so long as the
server can transcode. For Sonos to implement hi res would mean rip and
replace all the hardware
Transporter (Lounge)
Touch (Office)
Touch (Kitchen)
Rad
markiii wrote:
> isn't that because the Sonos has no equivelant of LMS to downsample?
correct. everything is built into the hardware units themselves. This
is why updates to improve things are a challenge for SONOS to the extent
they want to stay backwards compatible. They have a very differe
audio53 wrote:
> Sonos seems to be falling behind the curve regarding hi-rez files. They
> still do not support 24/96. I don't necessarily care about the super
> hi-rez files (no advantage to my ears) , but to me 24/96 support is
> desirable. Obviously, this is an individual decision. But, to you
Sonos seems to be falling behind the curve regarding hi-rez files. They
still do not support 24/96. I don't necessarily care about the super
hi-rez files (no advantage to my ears) , but to me 24/96 support is
desirable. Obviously, this is an individual decision. But, to your
question, this is a si
Why not making it yourself ? :
http://mesproductions.free.fr/repetiteur_IR/index.html
Dangze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34327
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=
Dangze wrote:
> My problem is : Will I be able to use the original remote control to
> start/stop my Touch, change the radio program, adjust the sound
> volume,...? If yes, that's OK ! If not (ie I need a smartphone or tablet
> to do it), that's not very OK !...
Don't know. One of the ickstream
garym wrote:
>
> So your Touch could work to access music services, internet streaming,
> etc. similar to mysqueezebox.com WITHOUT the use of a local server. He
> notes that you need an ickstream controller, but this just means an app
> on a smart phone or tablet, etc.
My problem is : Will I b
Dangze wrote:
> Thank you for your answer, even if it let me quite disappointed !...
>
> Because from the very beginning I had understood that ickStream will be
> THE solution after msqb.com shutdown (if this finally happens !).
>
> Using an external server (ie special hardware needed before st
Thank you for your answer, even if it let me quite disappointed !...
Because from the very beginning I had understood that ickStream will be
THE solution after msqb.com shutdown (if this finally happens !).
Using an external server (ie special hardware needed before starting to
listen internet r
THIS IS WHERE YOU COULD PURCHASE AN IPHONE WITH A SIGNIFICANT PRICE
KEEP IT IN MIND, THAT LISTED PRICE ARE BASE ON WHOSE WANTED TO ORDER 5
UNITS
THERE IS NO WAY YOU COULD GET 1UNIT IPHONE 6 AT THESE LISTED PRICE
WITH 1 YEAR INTERNATIONAL APPLE WARRANTY. WE'LL BEAT ANY PRICE
GUARANTEED
100% SAT
The main problem with this is that ickStream is a plugin and installing
plugins on the touch can be complicated. You would also have to run the
server on the Touch (have a USB drive of some kind attached - might as
well be empty, though).
We haven't tested it so even though there are builds of the
Hello,
I would like to raise a question that may have already answered, so
please excuse me if I missed it...
Will it be possible (if yes, when ?...) to install directly ickStream on
a SQB Touch and use it for example with TuneIn radios without installing
ickStream on a PC ? I'm not sure to have
ralphy wrote:
> I think that's a problem with the skin. What skin are you using?
>
> To be sure, please try using the WQVGA Small Print skin to see if it
> still happens. After changing the skin restart jivelite before testing.
It is OK Ralph. I hadn't set up the OFF screensaver properly.
All
ralphy wrote:
> I think that's a problem with the skin. What skin are you using?
>
> To be sure, please try using the WQVGA Small Print skin to see if it
> still happens. After changing the skin restart jivelite before testing.
I don't think it is that Ralph.
I have tried WQVGA.
I think you h
BenH73 wrote:
> What are the main advantages to Squeezbox over Sonos (I ask as a
> squeezebox user) for the average person. The only one I can see is that
> it's so cheap to add to an existing amp.
>
The average person still plays local files as opposed to streaming
music.** And, from what I've
Hi,
I want to build a LMS for mobile use (outdoor parties, camping) with one
of these devices:
http://www.intel.eu/content/www/eu/en/nuc/nuc-kit-de3815tykhe.html
Features:
* 12 V
* Intel Atom processor E3815, 1.46 GHz single core, 5 W TDP
* 4-GB eMMC storage device built in (for root file system)
23 matches
Mail list logo
