pfarrell;495243 Wrote:
> Er, you seem to be fighting the realities and economics of the consumer
> electronic industry.
Can't blame me for trying :)
--
squeez-er
squeez-er's Profile: http://forums
return. The Touch
- for my use - is a step backwards.
--
squeez-er
squeez-er's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32438
View this thread: http://forums.sli
d (and
bought..) just because it's new. Doesn't mean it's better.
--
squeez-er
squeez-er's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32438
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.
sed SB 1/2/3's, wait a year or so for the Touch
> price to drop to current SB3 prices, buy lesser capable streaming
> devices.
As much as I would love to believe that the Touch will 1/3 cheaper
after a year, I can't. My guess would be 3 years.
--
squeez-er
--
;s been bugging me for a long time :D
The fact that I now need to pay much more for things I don't need still
remains however. 300 euros is right on the edge of being WAY too much
for a device like SB's. This whole thing actually started when I
considered giving SB as a christmas
tion) I paid 200 for it.
Didn't know the MSRP was indentical, thanks for the info.
But then again, that doesn't really matter; all that matters is that
now the customer has to pay 1/3 more than before. If I would be the
customer, I would feel like I'm paying more for somethin
xpensive? Yet the new replacement is much more expensive than Classic?
--
squeez-er
squeez-er's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32438
View this thread: h
. In fact, it feels like they are trying to avoid
the subject of having to have your PC on all the time altogether.
I guess the Squeezebox concept is rather hard to sell to non-technical
people.
What's your opinion on all this?
--
squeez-er
---
