Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

andifor wrote: > => The difference is subtle, but I can hear it. And please don't ask me > to explain, *why* it sounds different. I have no clue of the technical > details :o) Thanks for the description! How many tests did you do, and how many of those did you get right? And how did you

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Julf wrote: > If it is just a subjective opinion, and we treat it as such, then yes. > Some of us might still want to understand the circumstances that lead to > it. Easy: - connect the mR (microRendu) on one input of my DAC - connect the Receiver on another input of my DAC - sync the two

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

drmatt wrote: > Like all individual's opinions, we are really not interested how they > were decided upon. When he wants to write a scientific paper about it > then he'll have to show his working... If it is just a subjective opinion, and we treat it as such, then yes. Some of us might still

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Like all individual's opinions, we are really not interested how they were decided upon. -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

andifor wrote: > Yes, I have. Good. How did you do it? "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Julf wrote: > Have you ensured levels are matched? Yes, I have. andifor's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16403 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=107821

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Squeezemenicely wrote: > Nope, sorry you got it wrong. The Receiver and the Transporter were/are > complete devices including the DAC. Therefore they can sound different, > since all is done in the device and the audio is output to your > amplifyer. You're right, the DAC is important as well. I

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

The SB devices that I still use are the Booms and Radios; the screens on them makes them great devices for bedroom and kitchen. But they are only ever going to be of interest to people who already have LMS. For real music listening I can't see what hardware could be made to please everyone. I'm

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

andifor wrote: > Well, you are invited to check for differences between a Receiver and a > microRendu. I have them both available and can connect them my DAC. - I > don't say, which device sound better (I just say, there is a > difference). Where ever this difference comes from. Have you

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Squeezemenicely wrote: > With the Sonore and Pi (without a DAC installed) you only have a > computer that runs the software, the "sound" is then dealt by with a DAC > that you connect to the USB port. It - if nothing is broken - has > nothing to do with the quality or "sound" of the audio, that

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Pi has analogue audio output, as do most DAC hats, so yeah they can "sound". -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k albums..

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

andifor wrote: > Talking about sound: If the Receiver sounds different than the > Transporter, a Sonore device might sound different than a Pi. > > Nope, sorry you got it wrong. The Receiver and the Transporter were/are complete devices including the DAC. Therefore they can sound different,

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

drmatt wrote: > Years of experience tells us that people will pay lots and lots of money > for a nice case... > Talking about sound: If the Receiver sounds different than the Transporter, a Sonore device might sound different than a Pi. Talking about cases: I prefer the Receivers case to the

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Years of experience tells us that people will pay lots and lots of money for a nice case... -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Squeezemenicely wrote: > Wow, just seen the prices on sonore - pretty steep for a "Pi in > disguise" ... Well, no idea what they are really using as hardware, but > running Squeezelite etc. > > What is the point of buying such a device? Just get a Pi with a DAC or > connect to the DAC of your

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Wow, just seen the prices on sonore - pretty steep for a "Pi in disguise" ... Well, no idea what they are really using as hardware, but running Squeezelite etc. What is the point of buying such a device? Just get a Pi with a DAC or connect to the DAC of your dreams. It is all the same, except

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Antoniop wrote: > I recently bought a new (!) squeeze radio on amazon market place and > would buy a touch or a transporter if I could. I didn't found similar > products on the market that could work as nicely with LMS. Fortunately > all my squeezebox devices are still working! > Those who

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

I realize I started the latest beat-the-dead-horse topic, but I really think with new sections of walmart and bestbuy dedicated to bluetooth speakers, that connected, syncable speakers are absolutely the next big thing. Even Sonos might be a little ahead of the market right now. Chromecast

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

nolan wrote: > How strong do you think Sonos are though? I can't see much of a future > for them unless they get acquired by Amazon or Apple. I know they are in > a lot of the big name stores but they have laid staff off and failed to > follow through with the voice control they announced. I can

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

The march of cheap, convenient, mediocrity will always win in the long term. -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k albums..

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

How strong do you think Sonos are though? I can't see much of a future for them unless they get acquired by Amazon or Apple. I know they are in a lot of the big name stores but they have laid staff off and failed to follow through with the voice control they announced. I can see they being a good

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

jfo wrote: > I suspect that Logitech has continued to support this project to protect > their intellectual property while taking a "wait and see" approach to > the possible options that might unfold which could allow them to extract > some value from their investment. It is certainly not because

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

I suspect that Logitech has continued to support this project to protect their intellectual property while taking a "wait and see" approach to the possible options that might unfold which could allow them to extract some value from their investment. It is certainly not because they are nice guy's

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

I really just hope that the people that are truly keeping this going (those here) are thinking ahead to a time when the domains and support are completely gone. I feel that they are (I'm not on this forum enough to know). I am impressed with how the loss of Spotify was quickly remedied by

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

garym wrote: > Excellent point. Every day I'm surprised when I click on this forum to > see what's up and it actually works versus a "page does not exist" > message. It's actually quite amazing that this forum still exists. It > will be sad to see it go (when it does). Well they renewed the

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

alfista wrote: > So even if Logitech, to put it bluntly, failed, they did so in a fairly > nice way. Excellent point. Every day I'm surprised when I click on this forum to see what's up and it actually works versus a "page does not exist" message. It's actually quite amazing that this forum

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

cliveb wrote: > Logitech were, and always would have been, the wrong company to buy Slim > Devices. Their core businesses were just miles apart. Perhaps, but I think most other companies would have struggled to keep the product line going, and most other companies would have wasted no time

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

drmatt wrote: > Hah, works for me :) > > > -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- .. with wifi i forgot that :D Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

toby10 wrote: > For SlimDevices it was the perfect time to sell. Taking into account > Logitech’s business model it was the wrong time for Logitech to buy. Logitech were, and always would have been, the wrong company to buy Slim Devices. Their core businesses were just miles apart. The

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

The story goes much deeper than we’ll ever know. I'm sure Michael Herger knows all the dirt but is unable say so publicly. ;) What little we do know……. Soon after Logitech acquired SlimDevices there was a major reshuffling of managers and department personnel at Logitech. The few individuals

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Mnyb wrote: > > Anyhow some stubborn fellow wants to sync 24/192 pcm over 5 players :D > and comes to our forum. Hah, works for me :) -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music: ~1300

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

drmatt wrote: > Sonos also made the executive decision to cripple their digital outputs, > for reasons no one can fathom; nor do they seem interested in sorting it > out. > > > -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- Probably due to old tech . more than 16/44.1 does not really do anything

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

One of the most attractive aspects of Squeezebox is the ability to use it (server and hardware) with high definition music, if one wants to. I have an optical connection to my stereo and have really loved the ability to listen to my surround sound music. There are things I wouldn't mind being

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

drmatt wrote: > Sonos also made the executive decision to cripple their digital outputs, > for reasons no one can fathom; nor do they seem interested in sorting it > out. And that must have cost them about five sales or something? I honestly don't think the majority of potential Sonos buyers

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Sonos also made the executive decision to cripple their digital outputs, for reasons no one can fathom; nor do they seem interested in sorting it out. -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music:

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

d6jg wrote: > My point was that Sonos had started to become accepted in the consumer > electronics field just as Logitech pulled out. Yes. Only a different subset of the consumers than the Squeezeboxes caters to. The fact that there was enough buyers to support Sonos doesn't suggest that there

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

cliveb wrote: > Sonos was around long before Logitech bought Slim Devices. The two > product lines were always at opposite ends of the market. Drawing an > analogy with HiFi, Sonos appealed to the sort of person who would buy an > integrated B system, whereas the Squeezebox system appealed to

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

d6jg wrote: > What is crystal clear though is that they killed the product line at > exactly the wrong time just as other high products such as Sonos etc > were being launched. Sonos was around long before Logitech bought Slim Devices. The two product lines were always at opposite ends of the

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Roon bussines model is not viable for squeezebox either . Software = open source LMS = no revenue . Squeezebox = DIY our own rpi3 = no revenue . Enhanced interlinked metadata so that you can build a roon like UX = licensed and costly (se all the trouble our comunity had with the lyrics plugin

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

d6jg wrote: > What is crystal clear though is that they killed the product line at > exactly the wrong time just as other high products such as Sonos etc > were being launched. Is it? Sonos had already gained good traction by the time Logitech shut down production, but I don't see the relevance.

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

mherger wrote: > > Even if this is a niche . For example ROON is trying to get piece of > the > > pie by selling software . With a kind of licensing model for,hardware > > they have no hardware of their own . > > I thought this would come up. But then that software is Roon's business. > >

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Even if this is a niche . For example ROON is trying to get piece of the pie by selling software . With a kind of licensing model for,hardware they have no hardware of their own . I thought this would come up. But then that software is Roon's business. They're small and obviously happy to

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Even if this is a niche . For example ROON is trying to get piece of the pie by selling software . With a kind of licensing model for,hardware they have no hardware of their own . Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

As many have said it ain't happening. Still, I offer my thanks to Logitech in general and to Michael specifically for maintaining these forums and LMS. As others have said the plug and play w no system/software maintenance is where most are today. Me, I still prefer the "old School" collecting,

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

d6jg wrote: > All this doesn't quite explain how you can still buy a brand new > Transporter SE on eBay and that new stocks of same keep appearing. Are > Logitech still manufacturing but only Transporters? Not only transporters are appearing. I missed a UE radio sale on amazon.fr some months

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

. This topic will always be discussed until one of two things happen, Squeezeboxen start showing up at Best Buy or Logitech goes out of business! Are either of those two things going to happen anytime soon, I don't think so, so the topic will live on. Logitech should be commended daily for their

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Those are "new, old stock" transporters. There is no manufacturing for a decade or so. LMS was always too hard for people, Sonos fixed that and appeals to the Apple buying industrial design generation to boot, despite being broadly mediocre for various reasons. Logitech had a ground breaking

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

toby10 wrote: > Exactly. Those and numerous other reasons are why it is a dead product. > *WE* all love them and *WE* get/use the SB advantages. But the mass > market could care less, and for very understandable reasons. In a world > of streaming compressed music on a mobile device listened

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Antoniop wrote: > Well, I am not sure. I don't know much these products, but SONOS is sold > everywhere and Bose have also a similar (?) product line. > Anyway, people say they're very easy to use, which is not the case with > LMS. > LMS is too complicated for old people and also for most of

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

I think Logitech could, and maybe should, launch another product line as squeezeboxes devices, but I don't think they will, unless they change their marketing strategy, which is to sell small devices, easy to use, not too expensive, for the young. Like... the UE Boom family of products?...

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

toby10 wrote: > > It's dead as a viable consumer product offering. Well, I am not sure. I don't know much these products, but SONOS is sold everywhere and Bose have also a similar (?) product line. Anyway, people say they're very easy to use, which is not the case with LMS. LMS is too

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

I can live with the current status quo as far as Logitech gives Michael enough room to do his thing. *SqueezeBoxes:* 2x SB2 (Living room and study), 1x Radio (Kitchen), 1x Boom (Dining room), 1x piCorePlayer (jacuzzi), 1x piCorePlayer (Garden) 1x OSMC + Squeezelite (Movie room), 1x Touch

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

FredFredrickson wrote: > Who thinks Logitech should resurrect the brand and start > selling squeezeboxen again? This has been discussed in here for years, over and over. It will never happen. It will never be resurrected, nor sold, nor licensed to a third party, etc.. It's dead

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Short answer: Nah, at least not a Squeezebox brand based on the architecture we know and (mostly) love. Don't get me wrong, I think the Squeezebox ecosystem is genuinely amazing. There seems to be no limit to the adaptability and extensibility, constantly made to run on new platforms with new

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

Actually I suspect you'll find a lot of people on the forum are quite happy with the status quo. The Pi/DAC/open source LMS solution is very compelling. Any reignite of Logitech official Interest could well see them grabbing that back in-house. At the very least it would likely be based around

[slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

I think Logitech got a little ahead of itself buying slim devices while the technology was still in the early-adapter phase, but since Logitech canned the brand, I've seen Sonos everywhere, as well as a number of competitors that have displays at Target, Best Buy, and even Walmart over the years.

Re: [slim] Logitech Media Server 7.7.3 released

Would this update get iHeart radio stations to play on the Squeezebox Radio? No, iHeartRadio currently is not supported on the SB. -- Michael ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com

Re: [slim] Logitech Media Server 7.7.3 released

Would this update get iHeart radio stations to play on the Squeezebox Radio? buffettck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=50355 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99452

Re: [slim] Logitech Media Server 7.7.3 released

thanks to all Touchx3,Boomx2,1 radio, 1 classic!Squeezebox Server 7.7.2 (Qnap ts-119) nervoteso's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30262 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Logitech Media Server 7.7.3 released

nervoteso wrote: > thanks but that guide is too difficult. is there any easier way to pdate > to 7.3.3 ot 7.8? It's not difficult to update to 7.8. It's difficult (but worth trying) to update to 7.9. So just skip the steps that are just for the 7.9.

Re: [slim] Logitech Media Server 7.7.3 released

nervoteso wrote: > thanks but that guide is too difficult. is there any easier way to pdate > to 7.3.3 ot 7.8? Here is a quick and dirty, cobbled together with cut and paste from other postings here and elsewhere. You don't have to come from Barcelona to be able to do this; 20368 First

Re: [slim] Logitech Media Server 7.7.3 released

thanks but that guide is too difficult. is there any easier way to pdate to 7.3.3 ot 7.8? Touchx3,Boomx2,1 radio, 1 classic!Squeezebox Server 7.7.2 (Qnap ts-119) nervoteso's Profile:

Re: [slim] Logitech Media Server 7.7.3 released

nervoteso wrote: > hi how to update from 7.7.2 to 7.3.3 on qnap ts 119? > > just change the version if you wish http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?101137-Upgrading-to-LMS7-8-on-my-TS-119-Success! atb Ronnie

Re: [slim] Logitech Media Server 7.7.3 released

hi how to update from 7.7.2 to 7.3.3 on qnap ts 119? Touchx3,Boomx2,1 radio, 1 classic!Squeezebox Server 7.7.2 (Qnap ts-119) nervoteso's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30262 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox controller app stopped working on XperiaZ

I like Squeeze Cntrl, and have also used Orange Squeeze. I preferred both to the Logitech app, before the latter stopped working after Android updates. They're both happily resident on my Z3, and don't cost much. LMS on a dedicated music server (FitPC3) Transporter (Ethernet) - main music

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox controller app stopped working on XperiaZ

I've got the same problem on my Samsung Galaxy S4 with Android v5.0.1 - the app loads but is unable to find the players on the network. Guess I shall have to delete and consider installing another controller app. I really only use it as an alternative remote control when I'm on the wrong side of

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox controller app stopped working on XperiaZ

> toby10 : > Undoing the Android update is not wise. It was updated to fix a > security flaw (which you just removed). I'm aware. I just uninstalled it to see if it would work. It is now back. > Update your Android's to the latest release then

[slim] Logitech Squeezebox controller app stopped working on Xperia Z

Earlier this year, the Logitech Squeezebox app stopped working, first on my Sony Xperia Z phone, and sometime later it stopped working on my Xperia Z tablet. The app just displays "Free you music" and then nothing more happens. I suspect that this was caused by system upgrades on the devices.

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox controller app stopped working on XperiaZ

Undoing the Android update is not wise. It was updated to fix a security flaw (which you just removed). Update your Android's to the latest release then use one of several third party Android control apps for SqueezeBox.

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox suddenly says Problem Connecting and never connects

Are you connecting to MySqueezeBox.com or LMS running on your computer? toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103562

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox suddenly says Problem Connecting and never connects

Thank you for the reply. I have a black Logitech radio that I bought at Best Buy in 2011. The M/N # is X-R0001 if that helps. I have quite a few stations/streams saved in my Favorites on the radio - not on my PC. I connect to the Internet using the router that is connected to my PC. I'm sorry, I

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox suddenly says Problem Connecting and never connects

howardbc wrote: Thank you for the reply. I have a black Logitech radio that I bought at Best Buy in 2011. The M/N # is X-R0001 if that helps. I have quite a few stations/streams saved in my Favorites on the radio - not on my PC. I connect to the Internet using the router that is connected to

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox suddenly says Problem Connecting and never connects

Thank you so much to everyone who responded to my plea for help! I had unplugged the radio several times over the last few days, but I plugged it back in within seconds. That didn't fix the connection problem. But an hour or so ago I unplugged it and brought it to the room where my PC is to send

[slim] Logitech Squeezebox suddenly says Problem Connecting and never connects

I've had my Logitech Squeezebox since 2011. It's always worked pretty well but a few days ago it suddenly wouldn't open/play. I get the message Problem Connecting. I've tried reconnecting several times. My PC and router are working fine. No changes. No added software that could affect the radio.

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

Tiresome. April 1st humor, why is this still a thing? Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103438

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

wo some humor/fun, what is the sense of anything ? Now I am off to listen to my 1910 Fruitgum Co. tunes. dasmueller's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38035 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

Gary this is evil - I believe it for a good 10 seconds. It was even more credible knowing that, last week I was in one of these consumer multimedia shops and they now all have a special place for multi room audio with a nice display of Sonos, Bose and Samsung systems and -finally- people that

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

philippe_44 wrote: Gary this is evil - I believed it for a good 10 seconds. It was even more credible knowing that, last week I was in one of these consumer multimedia shops and they now all have a special place for multi room audio with a nice display of Sonos, Bose and Samsung systems and

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

Mnyb wrote: I liked this one :) Especially how to use people's defiecent attention span for kicks , the text starts reasonably credible , but after a while it goes of a tangent to being more and more ridiculous . Yes, I thought the LogiMusic streaming service was a strong message that

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

garym wrote: Yes, I thought the LogiMusic streaming service was a strong message that this was April Fools! More a wish list than an April fools day joke eh Gary? ;) For me, now that I can make a pretty decent headless player with a Raspberry Pi, I2S DAC and a pretty case - all for less

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

TheLastMan wrote: The real magic with the Squeezebox system lies in LMS, and the many willing volunteers here that keep it running. Very true. But for some, the additional ingredient is the mysqueezebox.com in the background. Without this, things like Pandora and SiriusXM won't work.

[slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

[image: http://ir.logitech.com/common/alerts/LOGI/default/logo.gif] Logitech Announces Plans for Revived Squeezebox Music Player Line Lausanne, Switzerland April 1, 2015 The Company is proud to announce a return to the networked

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

In related news, Neil Young announces that Pono will be shutting down effective immediately in light of the Logitech announcement. Careful observers of the video clip Neil Young posted making this announcement noted a Logitech Squeezebox Touch player connected to the stereo system to Mr.

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

Is this for real Gary ? Its way after mid day! *Vortexbox LMS 7.8 music on QNAP TS419p via NFS* - iThingys/iPeng/Tablets *Living Room* - SB3 - Onkyo TS606 connected Digitally - Celestion Ditton F20s - and connected Analogue for Zone 2 - Sony TA FE 320 - Sennheiser RS 130 *Office* - SB3 - Sony

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

Hehehhe got you! Hint: Look at your calendar. Rg System information Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite USB Benchmark DAC2 D LFD LE IV Signature amp Revel Performa F208 speakers. Home Theatre: Touch (Wired) Pioneer VSX 919 Energy Take 5 Classic 5.1, Touch FW

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

God, I don't even know if I think it's funny ;-) /Stig Nygaard http://www.rockland.dk http://www.last.fm/user/rockland http://www.discogs.com/user/StigNygaard https://google.com/+StigNygaard Server: LMS 7.8.1-1421915369 (20150124) on ReadyNAS Ultra 2 Controllers/players: Squeezebox Classic, 2x

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

rgro wrote: Hehehhe got you! Hint: Look at your calendar. Its 15:30 here in UK Such things are supposed to stop at mid day It is very well written though and if only ... *Vortexbox LMS 7.8 music on QNAP TS419p via NFS* - iThingys/iPeng/Tablets *Living Room* - SB3 - Onkyo

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

d6jg wrote: Its 15:30 here in UK Such things are supposed to stop at mid day No such limitation here, across the pond. Rg System information Main: Vortexbox/Squeezelite USB Benchmark DAC2 D LFD LE IV Signature amp Revel Performa F208 speakers. Home

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

yep, it makes me sad too, given that this *should* be the announcement. Squeezeboxes and LMS are still the premier way to deal with digital music streaming. p.s. Neil Young really did like Devo and had plans for recording with them at some point. *Home:* VortexBox 4TB (2.3) LMS 7.8

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

Gray, Well done. LOL. ;) P Nelson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58158 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103438 ___

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

I liked this one :) Especially how to use people's defiecent attention span for kicks , the text starts reasonably credible , but after a while it goes of a tangent to being more and more ridiculous . Main hifi: Touch + CIA

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

Damn dasmueller's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38035 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103438 ___ discuss mailing list

Re: [slim] Logitech Announces New Line of Squeezebox Hardware Players

Almost got me :) riffer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13459 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103438 ___ discuss

Re: [slim] Logitech Transporter issue

Does the described above reset procedure work for stopping that degaussing sound? - remove power, hold down 1 button on remote and at the same time reapply power to the transporter until the screen goes into reset mode. I too have it constantly on my Transporter which is really annoying. Thanks

[slim] Logitech invests in the smart home with Harmony remote and hub

https://gigaom.com/2014/09/17/logitech-invests-in-the-smart-home-with-harmony-remote-and-hub/ Logitech Media Server Version: 7.9.0 - 1410276236 @ Wed Sep 10 04:02:02 UTC 2014 Operating system: Debian - EN - utf8Platform Architecture: x86_64-linux

Re: [slim] Logitech invests in the smart home with Harmony remote and hub

Oh, boy. Logitech jumps on another bandwagon. BFD. JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102147

Re: [slim] Logitech invests in the smart home with Harmony remote and hub

I recently bought the Harmony Hub, including the remote. It's designed primarily as a smartphone app, which is reasonably well designed, but I wanted a remote with buttons to replace my Harmony One. I like having a remote that doesn't have a screen that can break (as occurred with both my

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox iPad App

pippin wrote: Could you tell me exactly where that would be? I can't find Yesterday's programs in any of my UIs but maybe that's because I'm not in the UK Sorry for the delay in replying I have been away. Perhaps I did not express myself well. Yesterday's should perhaps have been The previous

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox iPad App

Yea, as you can see in the discussion above, I eventually got that. And yes, it's an issue in the App, use a different one if you care about the feature, I wouldn't expect to see a fix of the Logi App. --- learn more about iPeng, the iPhone and iPad remote for the Squeezebox and Logitech UE

[slim] Logitech Squeezebox iPad App

I have used the BBC iPlayer plugin, now v1.2.12 by Triode, for some years with my Duet. It works perfectly on the Logitech remote, the web interface and the Logitech Squeezebox Controller App on my Android phone. However, the Logitech Squeezebox App in my iPad (v4 iOS7) fails to display

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >