That's objectivly better than any crazy tag bending, even if it's just
one recording. I'm not saying it's perfect. But WAY better. (I browsed
here, like God intended :cool:, via GENRE (Violinkonzerte), COMPOSER
(Bach, Johann Sebastian), WORK (Violinkonzert in E-Dur, BWV 1042),
RECORDING (see
And despite of what was implied earlier, I do appreciate your work. But
I think that goes without saying.
That's why I help the way I know best. Sometimes it's by testing stuff,
sometimes it's by telling them what would be really really great and
make them understand that. ;-)
QLMS
mherger wrote:
> > Would it be possible for a plugin to just "scan more and put in the
> > native db"? I think you did this with FTS. If it's in there, couldn't
> it
> > be used for virtual libraries?
>
> It certainly could be done in a plugin. But that plugin would have to
> implement a lot
Would it be possible for a plugin to just "scan more and put in the
native db"? I think you did this with FTS. If it's in there, couldn't it
be used for virtual libraries?
It certainly could be done in a plugin. But that plugin would have to
implement a lot of what a "core" integration would
JohnB wrote:
> The overwhelming majority of my music collection is classical and I
> really have no problem using the existing tags (albeit that I use the
> album tag for the work and include the composer and main performer in
> the album name).
This is so wrong on so many levels. Yuck.
JohnB
The overwhelming majority of my music collection is classical and I
really have no problem using the existing tags (albeit that I use the
album tag for the work and include the composer and main performer in
the album name).
I've no objection to additional tags but there are work arounds for
adamdea wrote:
> I have no particular beef with ÂrecordingÂ. I could take it or leave
> it and find it tends to be inconsistently applied by metadata providers.
> Then again it may be popular with non classical folk with multiple
> reissues of the same recording. CanÂt you manage with
dolodobendan wrote:
> Yes, you do. That's how you keep your several recordings of Karajan's
> Beethoven's Fifth apart.
>
>
>
> That's why I propose basic tags (that are used in iTunes, for example.)
> it's nothing funky. To find a classical recording, you need the composer
> (already
adamdea wrote:
> I would love "work" tag support. I'm not 100% sure I need "recording".
> Any chance @mherger ?
Yes, you do. That's how you keep your several recordings of Karajan's
Beethoven's Fifth apart.
mherger wrote:
> > I would love "work" tag support. I'm not 100% sure I need
>
mherger wrote:
> > I would love "work" tag support. I'm not 100% sure I need "recording".
> > Any chance @mherger ?
>
> You give a good reason why it's unlikely this is going to happen any
> time soon: too many opinions as to what and how things should be
> implemented...
>
> The other
I would love "work" tag support. I'm not 100% sure I need "recording".
Any chance @mherger ?
You give a good reason why it's unlikely this is going to happen any
time soon: too many opinions as to what and how things should be
implemented...
The other major reason is time available vs. the
dolodobendan wrote:
> To browse classical music, you need COMPOSER (that's supported, yes),
> WORK (I don't think that's supported) and a third tag (and a third level
> in the menu for this third tag) like RECORDING (as ARTIST or ALBUM is
> insufficient if there's more than one recording from
pippin wrote:
> Umm there IS native support for these tags, ever since LMS 7.9
> You just need to use the Additional Browse Modes plugin (which ships
> with LMS, it's not an external plugin) to generate the menu structure
> you want.
>
> I think that's also what Daverz described above.
To
Daverz wrote:
> There has been a logstanding request for the GROUPING tag (ID3 TIT1) to
> be supported (it's in the bug reporting system somewhere). This could
> be used as a work tag.
>
> Found the feature request:
>
> http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557
Is there no support for
There has been a logstanding request for the GROUPING tag (ID3 TIT1) to
be supported (it's in the bug reporting system somewhere). This could
be used as a work tag.
Daverz's Profile:
dolodobendan wrote:
> There are enough "How do you tag your music" threads. This isn't
> supposed to be one. I, too, use Custom Browse, Custom Scan, and
> Multilibrary. But it's just a matter of time (I think) and they stop
> working with the latest version of LMS. As I've mentioned in another
sachadog wrote:
> Hi
> Have you looked at Klarita MUSO, which is still available to use with
> Logitech Media Server. It covers so much and as a user I find it
> invaluable.
> It has specific classical music settings that may be of help to you.
> I am not a classical music fan, but enjoy, from
My music library is mostly classical and the following works very well
indeed for me:
Album tag: individual work in format - - e.g. "Sibelius - Symphony No 3 - C Davis, Boston SO"
Title tag: Movement e.g. "I. Allegro moderato"
Composer tag: Composer, e.g. "Sibelius"
Artist tag(s): Main
Hi
Have you looked at Klarita MUSO, which is still available to use with
Logitech Media Server. It covers so much and as a user I find it
invaluable.
It has specific classical music settings that may be of help to you.
I am not a classical music fan, but enjoy, from time to time, listening
to
There are enough "How do you tag your music" threads. This isn't
supposed to be one. I, too, use Custom Browse, Custom Scan, and
Multilibrary. But it's just a matter of time (I think) and they stop
working with the latest version of LMS. As I've mentioned in another
thread, I no longer can
The simplest thing to do is use the COMPOSER tag and the built-in
Composer menu. In iPeng I would select the composer, then click on the
cover art, then the track you want to start playback with, then edit the
playlist. This has one advantage over an organized CD collection: for
example, if
Sure, things could be much better. Retagging my library would take
ages... ;)
lemppari's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1775
View this thread:
lemppari wrote:
> You're welcome! :) I agree in a way it's a mess. But the method I am
> using works pretty good for me. Advanced search helps a lot, just
> getting the original album is hard.
Eating steak with a spoon works pretty well, too, if you sharpen the
spoon. But maybe it's time for a
You're welcome! :) I agree in a way it's a mess. But the method I am
using works pretty good for me. Advanced search helps a lot, just
getting the original album is hard.
lemppari's Profile:
The horror you described proved my point, so thank you.
QLMS 7.9.2@2.04 x64 (digimaster) with perl 5.28 dedicated to me. :D /
QNAP 469L QTS 4.3.4
dolodobendan's Profile:
??? Rest in peace
lemppari's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1775
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110708
___
discuss
lemppari wrote:
> I've been using my own version of tagging for classical music. Composer
> is artist and album is work. For album/work I add hyphen and then the
> actual performers (conductor, ensemble, artists, singers,...). Obviously
> this method is not nice for compilations with partial
I've been using my own version of tagging for classical music. Composer
is artist and album is work. For album/work I add hyphen and then the
actual performers (conductor, ensemble, artists, singers,...). Obviously
this method is not nice for compilations with partial works, but for
those I add
Just found this article here:
https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2019/06/25/1561435241000/Classical-music-has-a-metadata-problem/
>
> It is no wonder then that classical music buyers still revert to compact
> discs where they can guarantee to find their favourite performances,
> when it comes to
29 matches
Mail list logo
