There are some ideas here, which is good, I'm glad to see soem interest.
But maybe I need to clarify some things to make what I am really
looking for more clear.
Like I said before, this is for my parents. My parents aren't computer
savvy, therefore I am the family IT manager. I want a minimum
4mula1;160103 Wrote:
There are some ideas here, which is good, I'm glad to see soem interest.
But maybe I need to clarify some things to make what I am really
looking for more clear.
Ok, maybe it needs to be explicitly stated: The capability that you're
looking for does not exist in
4mula1;160103 Wrote:
There are some ideas here, which is good, I'm glad to see soem interest.
But maybe I need to clarify some things to make what I am really
looking for more clear.
Like I said before, this is for my parents. My parents aren't computer
savvy, therefore I am the family
azinck3;160190 Wrote:
They have a dynamic IP so you can't use IP filtering, but you can at
least protect your web interface via a password. If you feel that you
need more security than this you can setup an SSH tunnel, as was
previously mentioned (though this would require them to have a
snarlydwarf;160205 Wrote:
Or if you are running Linux on your server, use something like knockd,
and have them knock on your server, which will open things up for
them and only them.
A bit trickier to set up, and I don't know of a knock client for
windows, but something like that should
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 11:34:02 -0800, erland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
snarlydwarf;160205 Wrote:
Or if you are running Linux on your server, use something like knockd,
and have them knock on your server, which will open things up for
them and only them.
A bit trickier to set up, and I
Michael Herger wrote:
IP restrictions are perfectly secure in practice (and faster as well).
...except if your ISP changes your IP every day.
Change you ISP, that'll teach 'm...
But you're right. Whitelisting IPs on the router requires static IP's on
both sides, or DynDNS on one side and a
...except if your ISP changes your IP every day.
Change you ISP, that'll teach 'm...
In Switzerland this is still standard. You don't have to change, though,
but only to pay. Almost all of them offer fixed addresses for a little
more money...
SSH is a hassle on Windows platfoms IMHO,
4mula1;159882 Wrote:
I would've searched but the search isn't currently working. Please
forgive me.
It looks like my parents will be getting a SB3 and I was wondering if
there was a plugin that could make their Slimserver act like a player
and connect to my Slimserver? I would need to
JJZolx;159903 Wrote:
Why not have their Squeezebox connect to your SlimServer?
My SlimServer is behind a firewall. I have port 22 open so I can use
SoftSqueeze at work, and I thought it would be nice to be able to link
one SlimServer to another via SSH. I don't see SSH being added to the
4mula1;160010 Wrote:
My SlimServer is behind a firewall. I have port 22 open so I can use
SoftSqueeze at work, and I thought it would be nice to be able to link
one SlimServer to another via SSH. I don't see SSH being added to the
Squeezebox firmware so SlimServer will have to do that
be warned, this could be really slow over DSL/Cable.
It isn't if you have a decent DSL/cable connection. I started doing this
when I had 400k outgoing. But I must admit that there's little going on at
times when I access slimserver from outside - as I'm typically not at home
then :-)
--
SuperQ wrote:
4mula1;160010 Wrote:
My SlimServer is behind a firewall. I have port 22 open so I can use
SoftSqueeze at work, and I thought it would be nice to be able to link
one SlimServer to another via SSH. I don't see SSH being added to the
Squeezebox firmware so SlimServer will have
IP restrictions are perfectly secure in practice (and faster as well).
...except if your ISP changes your IP every day.
--
Michael
-
http://www.herger.net/SlimCD - your SlimServer on a CD
http://www.herger.net/slim -
14 matches
Mail list logo
