Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-12-01 Thread cak
Why not leave DHCP on for the router (so it's serving) and just use a static IP for the SB? That's what I did. Sorry I wasn't clear. -- cak cak's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11641 View this

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-12-01 Thread cak
Rather than clutter up my network with even more lashed-together crap, I took the easy route: I upgraded my dhcpd to ISC 4.0.0. It's working great now! -- cak cak's Profile:

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-30 Thread cak
Um, ok. That's not how I define bridge in my mind, but that doesn't matter right now :-) I played around some this evening with no joy. It leads me to wonder - is this meant to be a two-way bridge? I'm trying to get access to an ethernet stub that's attached to my squeezebox, which connects to

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-30 Thread radish
cak;365160 Wrote: I played around some this evening with no joy. It leads me to wonder - is this meant to be a two-way bridge? I'm trying to get access to an ethernet stub that's attached to my squeezebox, which connects to the rest of the net via wireless ... not the other way around.

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-30 Thread cak
The SB can only connect to an AP, it can't act as one. Ah. That's a piece of information I didn't have, though it makes sense. I have turned off DHCP and the squeezebox is working ... but not obviously as a bridge. The device I'm bridging to will only do DHCP, so I'll have to do some more

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-30 Thread seanadams
cak;365170 Wrote: Does the SB have to be on to do the bridging? (powered on, of course) Electrically powered on, of course. But no, it doesn't matter if it's in standby (or screensaver) mode. Those are really just UI states. -- seanadams

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-30 Thread radish
cak;365170 Wrote: Does the SB have to be on to do the bridging? (powered on, of course) No, it has to be connected to the network (i.e. associated) but it doesn't need to be connected to SN or SC (or actually even have a valid IP). I have turned off DHCP and the squeezebox is working ...

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-23 Thread radish
DHCP can be flaky with bridging, and it's usually the fault of the DHCP server - I've had all sorts of trouble with it in the past. Basically the server is getting confused as to why there are two devices asking for IPs from what looks to it like the same place. If the server was implemented

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-23 Thread cak
OK thanks - I'll give that a try... though I would have thought that the bridging doesn't reuse the MAC address (that's why it's a bridge), so it doesn't look like the same place ... -- cak cak's Profile:

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-23 Thread peterw
Try a factory reset? All my SB2/SB3 use DHCP, and I've often used them as bridges for other devices. Neither the Squeezeboxes nor the bridged devices have had any trouble getting DHCP leases or using the network. -- peterw http://www.tux.org/~peterw/ free plugins:

Re: [slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-23 Thread radish
cak;362928 Wrote: OK thanks - I'll give that a try... though I would have thought that the bridging doesn't reuse the MAC address (that's why it's a bridge), so it doesn't look like the same place ... The frame comes from the bridge, because that's the device which is actually connected to

[slim] SB2 wireless bridge?

2008-11-22 Thread cak
I'm trying to set up my SB2 as a wireless bridge. I plug in the device with a crossover cable (and power it up - that's important!). I get the prompt to turn on bridging and do so. It continues to try to join the network .. fine. Then DHCP fails. This is 100% reliable. If I turn bridging off, it