Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-03-02 Thread garym
MrSinatra;693653 Wrote: > > gary, i don't think what ur talking about applies here... i have > things that have AA tags that aren't artist tags that show up, like > "Soundtrack (Film)" if it is the AA tag and has a comp tag, it will be > in both places, A tags don't apply. ah yes. got it. -

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-03-02 Thread MrSinatra
emalvick;693511 Wrote: > Does it really over-ride the AA tag in terms of browsing, though? Back > at one point while messing with the comp tag, if I had a comp tag + AA > (AA not equal to VA) the album would show up both under the AA and > under the VA (Compilations) menu... i.e. it seemed they

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-03-01 Thread garym
emalvick;693511 Wrote: > Does it really over-ride the AA tag in terms of browsing, though? Back > at one point while messing with the comp tag, if I had a comp tag + AA > (AA not equal to VA) the album would show up both under the AA and > under the VA (Compilations) menu... i.e. it seemed they

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-03-01 Thread emalvick
MrSinatra;693300 Wrote: > > its really debatable if server even needs to know something is a comp > or not, but for the sake of itunes users i have added explicit comp > tags to my files, which over-rides the AA tag for comp status. > Does it really over-ride the AA tag in terms of browsing, t

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-29 Thread MrSinatra
one of the problems with server imo, is that you can't switch easily on the fly between browsing just album artists, or all artists. in any case, i put an album artist on everything. for comps, sometimes its "Various Artists" but sometimes its "Soundtrack (Film)" or something like that. i basic

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-26 Thread JJZolx
pjs;692745 Wrote: > If we have a compilation album: > > Album: No Alternative > 01. Superdeformed (Artist = Matthew Sweet, Album Artist = Various > Artists) > 02. For All to See (Artist = Buffalo Tom, Album Artist = Various > Artists) > ... > 19. Verse Chorus Verse (Artist = Nirvana, Album Ar

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-26 Thread aubuti
pjs;692745 Wrote: > OK, thanks to everyone for the really instructive responses. I now > understand why I wasn't seeing the song artist being updated. It was > the ol' Artist vs Album Artist issue. I had changed the Artist in the > metadata, but I guess the "key" that's used when you browse "m

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-26 Thread Doug Wise
Here is how my workflow has evolved over the years as far as editing tags: I update the Album, Artist, Genre, Title, Track and Year tags with MP3Tag I delete all other tags with MP3Tag I use Foobar2000 to scan and update tags for ReplayGain I use MusicIP to scan and update the tags for Music IP D

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-26 Thread pjs
OK, thanks to everyone for the really instructive responses. I now understand why I wasn't seeing the song artist being updated. It was the ol' Artist vs Album Artist issue. I had changed the Artist in the metadata, but I guess the "key" that's used when you browse "music by artist" is the Albu

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-26 Thread Mnyb
Some files have padded tag area so a tag change may not chnage it's size that leaves timestamps , but you don't wnat to ruin your chronology in the new music folders so some poeple have found ways to just adjust the time stamp 2 seconds or similar . -- Mnyb

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-26 Thread JJZolx
pjs;692622 Wrote: > Just to make sure I'm *not* crazy, I wanted to verify that when I rescan > with "Find new and changed music" it won't update database entries when > the metadata changes only. That's incorrect. It _will_ update the database when only the metadata changes. If either the file s

Re: [slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-25 Thread erland
I'm not sure I understand the question but "Find new and changed music" will basically work as follows: 1. It detect all files that have a file modification timestamp that's later than the previously scanned version of the file, this means that it will detect: - New files which doesn't exist in S

[slim] Scanning - Metadata Changes

2012-02-25 Thread pjs
I have a lot of digital music and am on a lifelong quest to perfect my tagging (e.g. changing Artist/Album Artist from "UB 40" or "ub40" to the correct "UB40"). Just to make sure I'm *not* crazy, I wanted to verify that when I rescan with "Find new and changed music" it won't update database entr