I'm very much a newcomer here with very little technical knowledge so
this could well be a daft question.
I'm running two booms, two duet receivers and an SB+ on a wired home
network. Until recently both the music files and squeezecenter were
running on my iMac but I've recently moved over to a
Club1820;412429 Wrote:
Jeff, thanks for the response!!! lol
Well, lo and behold, last night I installed the 4/1 nightly build on my
home PC and problems gone!...
Are you not having the 'last 10 seconds' issue that Jeff is having? I
understand that is an existing problem with
Jeff, thanks for the response!!! lol
Well, lo and behold, last night I installed the 4/1 nightly build on my
home PC and problems gone! But I wasnt sure if Softsqueeze still had
anything to do with it since I also installed the updated plugin for
softsqueeze, ver 3.9b1
Well, today at work, I
That this wifi service will be available on all flights...
--
ericj
ericj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3230
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=61855
That this wifi service will be available on all flights...
...in particular in transatlantic flights :-)
--
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Fair enough, the news release said entire fleet, not every route.
Although, truth be told, Lufthansa did have wireless aboard for some
time on selected flights. That was by satellite, and had very latency,
I've read.
Still a nice feature, often neglected by users, is the ability to
access
Still a nice feature, often neglected by users, is the ability to
access your music and streaming when you are not at home
True. But as I wouldn't recommend opening SC to the internet, but using
VPN or SSH tunneling instead, I'm still hoping, someone will eventually
come up with a SP
Yes, it would be good, since ssh was part of softsqueeze, IIRC.
Right now, looking at the forums, there been attempts to use ssh, but I
can't see any well documented successes.
--
ericj
ericj's Profile:
and works extremely well running as a service on my Ubuntu server.
--
bernt
'LastFM' (http://www.last.fm/user/ottovonkopp/)
SB3 - SC 7.3.2 - Ubuntu Server 8.04
bernt's Profile:
An Aeroplane - until recently the very last place where mankind was safe
from work email and phone calls. Thank you for putting a silver lining
on that oh-so-dark cloud.
--
bagawire
bagawire's Profile:
Ok. So am I the only one that going to post to this thread? :)
No one else is experiencing either of these issues with SqueezePlay?
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
--
Club1820
Rotel RSP-1068, Rotel 1060 DVD, Rotel RCC-1055, Rotel 1095 Amp, Rotel
956 Amp, Rotel RLC-1040, MK VX-860 Sub,
I have issues with it as well, sound cuts out with around 10 seconds
left.
That said. Squeezeplay is Beta and development has basically been put
on hold, so there is nothing that can be done.
I suggest not using it until they have the resources to work on it
again.
--
Jeff Flowerday
I'm having 2 different issues with SqueezePlay on 2 different PCs.
1. PC at home - Windows Vista Platform, SqueezePlay ver. 3/26 nightly
build.
Plays current song for only 30 seconds then starts the song all over
again. Plays 30 seconds again. Starts song over again. Repeats this
cycle
Update:
Downloaded the 3/31 nightly build of SqueezePlay for the Home PC. Same
issue (30 secs then start over) plus at times it only plays anywhere
from 1 to 10 secs of the song and then starts over. Also, after a few
cycles, it stops completely. I have to restart playback for the cycle
to
Update #2:
Downloaded the 3/31 Nightly build for the PC at work. Same result, the
current song plays completely, starts to crossfade with itself and then
plays again. Repeats this cycle till I manually stop playback.
--
Club1820
Rotel RSP-1068, Rotel 1060 DVD, Rotel RCC-1055, Rotel
sredmyer;409784 Wrote:
First there is no Settings menu that I can get to. This PC (SP) has
never successfully connected to SC.
SP starts out on a screen asking what language I want. After selecting
English, I get a Welcome screen which says Lets get started by
getting you connected to
Thanks for your post, ericj. I am glad to see you are a satisfied
customer :-) I don't work for Aircell, but I work for the company that
designed and makes the processor unit and WAP that goes on the aircraft.
We have never been busier. WiFi on aircraft is the new 'big thing.'
--
audio53
On a cross country flight on AA, I needed to send an emergency email or
two for work, so purchased the inflight wifi, called 'gogo.' I am
currently listening to my squeezecenter at 30,000 feet, using
squeezeplay, transcoding it to 128K mp3. It is quite solid, and I
doubt that I could hear the
You're streaming from your home server? That's pretty cool. :)
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=61855
ericj;410588 Wrote:
Does anyone know what technology is being used?
Seems to be ground towers:
http://www.gogoinflight.com/gogo-static/pdf/vs_inflight_internet.pdf
--
Mark Lanctot
Current: SB2, Transporter, Boom (PQP3 - late beta), SBC (early beta)
Stored: Boom (PQP1 - early beta)
Sold:
(and I posted this as well, but I was afraid of being ostentatious), but
yes, I am streaming from my msi wind to squeezeplay.app on my
notebook.
Thanks for pointing out the ground towers as the source, the download
rate seems to be okay
--
ericj
ericj-- you win cool post of the day. streaming from a netbook on the
ground, no less.
cheers,
#!/ben
+---+
|Filename: snakesonaplane.jpg |
|Download:
That image scares me. But, fwiw, the server is the MSI Wind, the atom
desktop. There is a healthy discussion in the third party hardware
section.
--
ericj
ericj's Profile:
Is your computer probably configured on a different subnet (as in
192.168.0.x vs. 192.168.1.x)? In that case you will have to enter the
server's IP address manually (in SP).
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote, at penguinlovesmusic.com
pippin;409442 Wrote:
Is your computer probably configured on a different subnet (as in
192.168.0.x vs. 192.168.1.x)? In that case you will have to enter the
server's IP address manually (in SP).
No that is not it...everything on the same subnet.
How would I go about setting the IP manually
Settings-Music Source-Other Server
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote, at penguinlovesmusic.com
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777
View this thread:
sredmyer;409341 Wrote:
I have a Duet and a PC (setup with SqueezePlay). The duet connects to
my server (a Win2K3 box running SqueezeCenter) but for some reason the
PC cannot connect. The PC is not wireless it is connected to the LAN
via Cat5 cable. It is connected to the server in all
Mnyb;409623 Wrote:
The PC's firewall ? for SC port 9000 is enough but SP needs more.
3483 TCP
3483 UDP
9000 TCP
( 9092 ) ?
( 9090 ) ?
Good thought but I have the firewall turned off on the machine in
question.
--
sredmyer
Steve Redmyer
www.RipitDigital.com
pippin;409505 Wrote:
Settings-Music Source-Other Server
First there is no Settings menu that I can get to. This PC (SP) has
never successfully connected to SC. SP starts out on a screen asking
what language I want. After selecting English, I get a Welcome
screen which says Lets get started
I have a Duet and a PC (setup with SqueezePlay). The duet connects to
my server (a Win2K3 box running SqueezeCenter) but for some reason the
PC cannot connect. The PC is not wireless it is connected to the LAN
via Cat5 cable. It is connected to the server in all other ways
(mapped drives,
spc337;396838 Wrote:
Can someone point me to a way to get debugging information from the
client?
Did you look in /var/log/squeezecenter/ ? There are some log files
there, as well.
I am running SqueezePlay on the Mac (Leopard) running SC on Linux
(Ubuntu). It works fine, except there is a
Hello,
I´ve installed squeezeplay on my Computer. Some Internet Radio Streams
sound like fast forwarding (Like a chipmunk song) or some of them too
slow. I tested this streams with another audio player and the playback
was normal.
Someone any idea, how to solve this???
Thanx
David
--
Tirionvalar;402984 Wrote:
I´ve installed squeezeplay on my Computer. Some Internet Radio Streams
sound like fast forwarding (Like a chipmunk song) or some of them too
slow. I tested this streams with another audio player and the playback
was normal.
Someone any idea, how to solve this???
Just open console.app, when I do this I see a ton of messages logged by
.com.logitech.squeezeplay
(you could filter on this.)
BTW, works ok for me, squeezeplay mac - SC linux.
--
epoch1970
epoch1970's Profile:
Still doesnt work for me.. Anyone have any other ideas to try...
Can someone point me to a way to get debugging information from the
client?
--
spc337
spc337's Profile:
I gave up on the java based soft players that come with SC. Too
fragile. I'm pretty sure the issue wasn't the app itself but java.
If you are using Win or Linux, there are versions of a command-line
soft player called squeezeslave.
If you do a search for it here, there'll be comments - or you can
I'll try that tonight although I'm surprise the Mac is blocking the
outbound.. I think it would still be useful if there was a debug mode
with viewable logging information.
thxs
--
spc337
spc337's Profile:
Doesn't seem to do much for me..
On MacOSx Leopard, I've turned off the firewall - Accept all
inbound...
On Ubuntu - iptables shows ACCEPT for Input, Forward, Output... which
should be all open ports...
I really need debugging help to see if the client is the issue or the
server...
--
Any help is welcome... Not sure what information you would like but
here are the version numbers for the various bits -
Server - Ubuntu Server 8.04.2
SqueezeCenter Version: 7.3.2 - 24695 @ Mon Jan 19
17:13:58 PST 2009
iMac - MacOSx 10.5.6
SqueezePlay Beta 7.3r3992m
The two computers are on
Try to open more ports in the firewall for the Mac ?
As experiment take down the firewall to see what happens.
If this works then:
Web UI is happy with only port 9000 open ( I think )
try to open port 3483 tcp udp and 9090 9092 while your at it.
I can never remember which ones is tcp or udp
Hey Guys,
So I've been trying Softsqueeze for a week primarily play both on my
Computer Speakers while Streaming to my Duet.
After seeing a few other threads saying the saying troubles with
Softsqueeze and Sirius and my own experiences, I've thrown in the towel
for Softsqueeze 3.7.
After some
Is anyone running SqueezePlay successfully on a Mac with a linux
server?? I'm surprised no one is having a similar problem.
--
spc337
spc337's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14315
View this
Is anyone running SqueezePlay successfully on a Mac with a linux
server??
Sure, I am.
I'm surprised no one is having a similar problem.
Which leads us to the conclusion that something about your system is different.
Tell us about it.
--
Michael
Running on FreeNAS here, not full blown Linux, but am working ok with
multiple SqueezePlay versions (up to 7.4) on MacOS 10.5.6 and
SqueezeCenter 7.3.3.
--
talbotpat
talbotpat's Profile:
I'm running SC7.3.2 on Ubuntu server. I've downloaded the latest
SqueezePlay for 7.3 on my Mac. When I select Music Source, SqPlay sees
my server but isn't able to connect, justs asks if I want to try again.
Any thoughts?
--
spc337
I just did a little test myself, but it does seem to be scrobbling for
me. I downloaded the latest version of the 7.3.3 nightly just this
morning, though I think it has always scrobbled for me ever since the
first version.
I think SqueezeCenter handles the scrobbling rather than the players
Yesterday, I was switching between SqueezePlay and my 2 Booms. Later I
tried Squeezeslave, too, to see if it was scrobbling. Only the songs
played on my 2 Booms were sent to Last.FM. SqueezePlay and SqueezeSlave
were not scrobbling. How can that be if it is handled by SqueezeCenter?
I have seen
Hmmm... now today SqueezePlay is scrobbling. I'm confused. Nothing
changed from yesterday to today, except I closed and re-opened SP.
--
MeSue
Sue
http://www.last.fm/user/MeSue
MeSue's Profile:
Glad it works now :)
Just for the record, I was using SqueezePlay as a stand-alone player. I
haven't really tried it synchronized yet.
--
furonfour
'Last.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/wostu) - Chaos is the mother of all
creation.
After using SqueezePlay all day, I have just noticed that nothing has
been scrobbled from that player. I do have it enabled for scrobbling.
Is this one of the known beta limitations?
--
MeSue
Sue
http://www.last.fm/user/MeSue
funkstar wrote:
MeSue;390254 Wrote:
Don't you mean SqueezePlay? SoftSqueeze is the legacy one.
Bolls! Yes, thats exactly what I meant Sue. Appologies for being
completely dense this afternoon.
Well, the SD guys don't make it easy on you.
SliMP3 - SqueezeBox (SB)
SlimServer
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Peter landen-sl...@frg.eur.nl wrote:
Well, the SD guys don't make it easy on you.
SliMP3 - SqueezeBox (SB)
SlimServer
SqueezeBox 2 (Same box, different insides)
SqueezeNetwork (SlimServer, but this time hosted)
Squeezebox 3 (Same insides, different box)
running 7.3.2 - 24695 @ Mon Jan 19 18:55:04 PST 2009
I use squeezeplay on my XP work PC to stream music from home. It does
seem much more reliable than softsqueeze - though I do like softsqueeze
more. There are several things it seems to be missing - unless I've
missed something.
a) Ability to
There's certainly an enhancement req for (a), you should be able to find
vote for it (I think it's filed under Controller, but it's the same
software).
--
radish
radish's Profile:
The second two issues are likely to be resolved at some point as well.
As it stands SoftSqueeze is a fairly basic derivation from the software
running on the Controller. As it doesn't need to have a volume option
(built in hardware volume) there isn't a UI for it right now. Same goes
for the
coppo23;390198 Wrote:
b) Volume control option. The only way I've found of setting the volume
is via SC web interface or the overall wave device volume on control
panel.
The wiki is your friend:
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/SqueezePlay
Vol up: + or = (or media key VOLUP on computer)
funkstar;390238 Wrote:
The second two issues are likely to be resolved at some point as well.
As it stands SoftSqueeze is a fairly basic derivation from the software
running on the Controller. As it doesn't need to have a volume option
(built in hardware volume) there isn't a UI for it right
MeSue;390254 Wrote:
Don't you mean SqueezePlay? SoftSqueeze is the legacy one.
Bolls! Yes, thats exactly what I meant Sue. Appologies for being
completely dense this afternoon.
--
funkstar
funkstar's Profile:
First of all does anyone know how to remove a favorite in Squeezeplay.
ALso some weird problems such as not being able to play slacker, red
certain music files from radio stations and the weirdest thing is some
times it plays speeded up like its in fast forward with sound. How long
has this been
Hi,
I tried to get the new SqueezePlay to work from my office the other
day, wanting to listen remotely with it. In the settings I couldn't,
however, find a way to enter a URL by a domain name, instead of IP
numbers.
I'd guess most of us have an ISP that provide only dynamic IPs, and
people use
Cheers for the info. The OS is Vista Ultimate on the laptop and WHS (or
Windows Server 2003) on my well WHS ;-)
Neither reported an update was available for SoftSqueeze and I don't
even have SoftSqueeze installed on the WHS :-?
I'll try your suggestions and post back :-)
--
Rawr, I have just spent the last 15 mins searching for this as well (it
helps knowing the name but frankly when you are new to something, it
could be any permutation of the following:
slim, squeeze, player, play, box, controller, center, server... you
catch my drift :)
Somehow I managed to
Equally confused here too.
I have SoftSqueeze 3.6 telling me there's a new download for it
following my upgrade to SqueezeCentre 7.3 which only points at an old
SourceForge link for SoftSqueeze 2.0!
I found the wiki for SqueezePlay but no download link :-?
Searched on this forum and found many
Part of the confusion is that 7.3.1 is very much released.
But SqueezePlay is still in beta testing, so you find it the beta
download archive or as source code.
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Nightly_Builds
The wiki is not edited to reflect that 7.3.1 beta is now 7.3.2 beta
but under
Ahh many thanks. So the Soft Player option (be it SoftSqueeze or
SqueezePlay) aren't developed in tandem with SqueezeCentre then?
I find that a bit odd as I have a release of SoftSqueeze that is
obviously an RC version (3.6), but when coupled with SqueezeCentre 7.3
loses the ability to select
Have you tried uninstalling the version of SoftSqueeze you have and
re-installing from SC7.3?
There should be a SoftSqueeze 3.7.
--
bonze
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - SqueezeCenter Version: 7.3.2 - 24415
3 x wireless SB3 + a Duet
Really!?
Why wouldn't the installation routine report that?
--
HydeTheDarkerSide
HydeTheDarkerSide's Profile:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14952
View this thread:
Hyde - what OS are you running? I ask because I saw something similar
when I moved from one of the 6.x versions of SC to an early 7.x on
Windows.
3.7 of Softsqueeze is available 'here'
(http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=105169package_id=113211release_id=629909)
but
Personally I think SqueezePlay (Beta) is great.
Yes it's a very simple graphical interface, as opposed to to a Windows
style application for example, but it does the job for me because I am
sick of using SoftSqueeze.
For me SoftSqueeze is clunky and bug-ridden.
I agree, something more akin to
I think the interface would be great putting it in a touchscreen monitor
display, since it keeps things simple.
Altough the perfect thing for a desktop for me would be something like
the Songbird interface but for controlling Squeezecenter.
--
pichonCalavera
*rip* (eac) *convert* (flac)
Well the whole thing is also a hint to community developers learn lua,
make a nice skin to SP (nudge nudge ) .
Somebody out there must be tempted.
Otherwise what is, is good and fast.
Besides that it is beta in my case this beats softsqueeze by a mile
(java yuck !) I'm actually using this app.
Okay, this is a bit of a cross-post, but...
You indicate conversion of 96k to 48k files to SP. Do the files play
for you correctly at 48k on Squeezeplay? I ripped some audio from
concert DVDs, and am ending up with FLACs at 48k. They don't seem to
play correctly on squeezeplay (they seem to
tcutting;376222 Wrote:
Okay, this is a bit of a cross-post, but...
You indicate conversion of 96k to 48k files to SP. Do the files play
for you correctly at 48k on Squeezeplay? I ripped some audio from
concert DVDs, and am ending up with FLACs at 48k. They don't seem to
play correctly
All of the network devices on my home network are using DHCP, so each
one is unique (10.0.1.x). I am NATing to the Internet, so each one
will have the same public facing IP address.
--
NealTheGeek
NealTheGeek's Profile:
Greetings.
I am new to this, so please bear with me. I bought my wife a SB Boom
for a Christmas gift. I installed SqueezeCenter on one of my Mac
Mini's. All is working great. She can use the Boom to listen to her
music and Sirius, so she is happy.
I want to be able to listen to the music
Stupid Wild Assed Guess: could the Boom and the Softsqueeze be getting
the same IP address on your network?
davep
--
davep
davep's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=61
View this thread:
What I am looking for is a graphical front end that my wife can use on
the macintosh that is easy to use and can control all of our 5 squeeze
systems. I bought my first squeeze system in October and have been
really impressed and have put systems all over our house. The only
problem is that my
kesey;374653 Wrote:
With regard to your statement that I'd rather they spent time
concentrating on SqueezeCenter and the Controller than prettifying a
desktop music player, I would point out that some of us like to listen
to music while we use our computers. If we don't have a Slim
Sorry, I know this has been asked before but all the threads I can find
on the topic seem to be out of date.
Could someone let me know where I can download the SqueezePlay Beta
from please? I've tried everywhere I can think of but can't find it.
Thanks.
--
hunta
It's weird but for some reason I had loads of trouble trying to find it
too.
it's 'here' (http://downloads.slimdevices.com/nightly/latest/7.3/) in
the nightlybuild.
see squeezeplay-setup.exe
--
Gibbo
Gibbo's Profile:
I have an issue with Squeezeplay. I am wondering if anyone else has the
same issue. Going into my Music Library I find that Artists are in
alphabetial order. But the Album view is not, in fact it seems to in
alphabetical order of the artists.
Please advise if I am doing something wrong.
Have a look at Settings/Advanced/Album Sort Order - sounds like you may
have it set to Artists/Album, whereas I think you want Album alone from
the sounds of your post.
--
Siduhe
Who am I on 'LAST.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/siduhe)?
-Siduhe Loved Tracks radio got the thumbs up. Feedback
Siduhe;375080 Wrote:
Have a look at Settings/Advanced/Album Sort Order - sounds like you may
have it set to Artists/Album, whereas I think you want Album alone from
the sounds of your post.
Siduhe
Thanks for that. You were spot on. I had not found that part of
Squeezeplay before. I guess
bonze;374384 Wrote:
Depends who the customer is.
If it's a Duet customer then SqueezePlay is more relevant as it mimics
the Controller.
If it's a Boom/Classic customer then maybe SoftSqueeze as that would
look like the interface they are used to.
One thing top remember is that
rksingla wrote:
I read in the 7.3 roadmap that SqueezePlay was being developing into a
full screen graphical interface to SC. I have been looking forward to
that (and hoped it would give my wife a more attractive way to control
our system). But when I downloaded SqueezePlay from the 7.3.1
peter;374364 Wrote:
It's an interface and it's graphical isn't it?
Regards,
Peter
PS: I'm not too enthusiastic about it either.
From an attractiveness point of view, I think the Softsqueeze interface
is much more pleasant and interesting looking than the Squeezeplay
interface. It is
Depends who the customer is.
If it's a Duet customer then SqueezePlay is more relevant as it mimics
the Controller.
If it's a Boom/Classic customer then maybe SoftSqueeze as that would
look like the interface they are used to.
One thing top remember is that SoftSqueeze is no longer developed
Hopefully they develop it from here, it is basically the same lua app
that is running on the controller ? probably with a bunch of relevant
changes to make work on a desktop.
The Desktop skin an full screen skin is a beginning thats probably as
far as you get for free from the controller
I'm not overly enthusiastic about the GUI portion of SqueezePlay either.
What I am hoping for, however, is it to be a better PC player. I
currently use Squeezeslave on my pc, but it has some limitations that I
believe the Squeezeplay player is addressing. I use either Moose (since
I'm on
I think the word free is quite important.
They (Logitech) are providing an extra way of enjoying your
Duet/SB/Boom experience with an app that sits discreetly in the corner
of your screen and is easy to use as the Controller.
If you don't want to see the small box then minimise it.
If you need
bonze wrote:
I think the word free is quite important.
So, your point seems to be If it's free, you can't criticize it.
Thankfully, not many people feel that way or the Open Source community
would be in a very sad state indeed.
X.
___
discuss
peter;374509 Wrote:
bonze wrote:
I think the word free is quite important.
So, your point seems to be If it's free, you can't criticize it.
Thankfully, not many people feel that way or the Open Source community
would be in a very sad state indeed.
X.err. No - Please don't try and
bonze;374503 Wrote:
I think the word free is quite important.
They (Logitech) are providing an extra way of enjoying your
Duet/SB/Boom experience with an app that sits discreetly in the corner
of your screen and is easy to use as the Controller.
If you don't want to see the small box
Actually, I think the really important word to remember for SqueezePlay
is Beta. It's not done yet folks - particularly playback
functionality!
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Release_Notes
--
radish
radish's
I read in the 7.3 roadmap that SqueezePlay was being developing into a
full screen graphical interface to SC. I have been looking forward to
that (and hoped it would give my wife a more attractive way to control
our system). But when I downloaded SqueezePlay from the 7.3.1
nightlies onto our
There is a desktop skin that makes everything bigger and can be
maximized to your screen, but other than that it is still pretty much
like the Controller last time I looked. I believe much of it is still
in the works.
--
MeSue
Sue
http://www.last.fm/user/MeSue
Thanks, thats what I thought.
Still have a problem-- I have no idea how to open the ports - Can
someone lead me through it ?
Thanks in advance
--
dman
dman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21947
Hi,
In article radish.3khscb1229398...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com,
radishradish.3khscb1229398...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com wrote:
Take a look at bugs.slimdevices.com to see if there's already a bug
ticket there, and if not raise one :)
Done.
Andy
Is not an even simpler method in some firewalls ? in some of them you
can add an application and allow bla bla something (norton)
Or create rules like in NOD32 ?
Sorry I don't have AVG8 i don't now how to configure it ?
Is there a config menu somewhere, right click on taskbar icon ?
--
Mnyb
Hi all,
After 7.3 was release I upgraded my SqueezeCenter from SVN, and downloaded
the latest nightly of SqueezePlay. For the first time ever I am able to play
back using SqueezePlay as the player rather than having to use it to control
an instance of SoftSqueeze.
However, I'm seeing something
701 - 800 of 822 matches
Mail list logo
