Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 17:42 -0500, Aaron Zinck wrote: > > There would not be anyway to program them, as the remote does not generate > > those codes. > > Sure there would. The squeezebox will recognize virtually all ir codes. Not RC-5 codes. -- Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Aaron Zinck
> There would not be anyway to program them, as the remote does not generate > those codes. Sure there would. The squeezebox will recognize virtually all ir codes. Let's say the "menu" button on your remote currently has no squeezebox functionality. You can monitor the d_ir debugging output to

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Michael Amster
Chris Mason wrote: I just programmed the MX-700 for the Squeezebox and several other devices, it works very well with the exception of the lack of discrete codes. If all you are doing is replacing remotes device for device it will work great, but if you want to do any of the automation one generall

RE: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Chris Mason
> If you have more buttons available on your remote than are > available on > the standard remote shipped with the Squeezebox, you should probably > create your own .ir file. There would not be anyway to program them, as the remote does not generate those codes. -- No virus found in this ou

RE: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Chris Mason
Fax (815)301-9759 Yahoo IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype ID: netconcepts > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Aaron Zinck > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 3:41 PM > To: discuss@lists.slimdevices.com > Subject: Re: [s

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Marc Sherman
Chris Mason wrote: So if I change power = power_toggle To power = power_on The unit will only be turned on with the power code? I have no need of turning it off. I haven't tested it, but that should work. If you have more butto

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Aaron Zinck
"Chris Mason" wrote > I have no idea what that is. The MX-700 can only learn from IR codes > transmitted from the remote. I think you must be thinking of a different > system. I believe the MX-700 has a port in the side of it for computer programming. That's probably what Marc's referring to. Eit

RE: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Chris Mason
: Monday, March 14, 2005 3:37 PM > To: Slim Devices Discussion > Subject: Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG > > > Chris Mason wrote: > > I have no idea what that is. The MX-700 can only learn from > IR codes > > transmitted from the remote. I think y

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Marc Sherman
Chris Mason wrote: I have no idea what that is. The MX-700 can only learn from IR codes transmitted from the remote. I think you must be thinking of a different system. You should make yourself familiar with the facilities provided by the slimserver developers before you criticize them for not "r

RE: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Chris Mason
t; Subject: Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG > > > Chris Mason wrote: > > In the systems I am responsible for, the power button on > the remote's main > > page turns on the Projector, the DVD, the Sat. receiver, > and the Squeezebox. > > If the

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Marc Sherman
Chris Mason wrote: In the systems I am responsible for, the power button on the remote's main page turns on the Projector, the DVD, the Sat. receiver, and the Squeezebox. If the Squeezebox is on, it turns it off. This is a royal pain but not the fault of the remote. The developers shoud recognize t

RE: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-14 Thread Chris Mason
I just programmed the MX-700 for the Squeezebox and several other devices, it works very well with the exception of the lack of discrete codes. If all you are doing is replacing remotes device for device it will work great, but if you want to do any of the automation one generally needs to do to ma

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-10 Thread Dondi Fusco
My $.02 as to Universal Remotes My Harmony 768 has performed flawlessly for my for more than a year now and controls EVERYTHING I own... even my appliances, downloads TV listings, controls the SB, LCD-TV, VCR, DVD player, Windows Media Cntr Edition, lights, air conditioner, fireplace, thermosta

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-10 Thread Jeff Allison
Nic Wardle wrote: Hi I know its not actually to do with Squeezebox, but do any users > have experience of the Pronto NG universal remote by philips > ? Especially with regard to using their SB with it? I am looking for a "one-for-all" solution to the miriad of > remotes I now have. I remember so

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG (Now Harmony Endorsement)

2005-03-10 Thread Thomas B. Malsbury
Danny Rego wrote: - Original Message - From: "Nic Wardle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi I know its not actually to do with Squeezebox, but do any users have experience of the Pronto NG universal remote by philips? Especially with regard to using their SB with it? I am looking for a "one-for-al

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-10 Thread Jeffrey Gordon
Nic Wardle wrote: Hi I know its not actually to do with Squeezebox, but do any users have experience of the Pronto NG universal remote by philips? Especially with regard to using their SB with it? I am looking for a "one-for-all" solution to the miriad of remotes I now have. I remember some comme

Re: [slim] Universal Remote - Philips Pronto NG

2005-03-10 Thread Danny Rego
Just to get my 2 cents inthe Harmony 688 is an excellent remote, and for the first time EVER, I have been using ONE REMOTE for 15 devices. ...and it's easy for the wife to use. Danny Rego - Original Message - From: "Nic Wardle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "discuss" Sent: Thursday, March