[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any plans to incorporate a calendar program in OOo suite? I actually prefer
OOo but I need the calendar program MS has.
Have you looked at the calendar program available from Mozilla.org on
the products page? I use Mozilla Thunderbird with the calendar
extension.
On 7/24/05, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 00:09:49 AM +0100, CPHennessy
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > > Now please somebody explain me what are the concrete, technical
> > > obstacles to this.
> >
> > Actually finding the time and energy to do this.
>
> 1) thi
Any plans to incorporate a calendar program in OOo suite? I actually prefer
OOo but I need the calendar program MS has.
Thanks
CT
I think that Peter has done a good job in explaining his point.
Now the rest of those who keep on posting and complaining are doing exactly
what
they said that Peter was doing, cruding up the reflector with lotsa stuff I
just delete.
Maybe you all need a mediator to come to a consensus and le
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 00:09:49 AM +0100, CPHennessy
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Now please somebody explain me what are the concrete, technical
> > obstacles to this.
>
> Actually finding the time and energy to do this.
1) this is NOT a technical obstacle, so my friendly provocation still
h
Marco wrote:
> > You conveniently ignored the critical thing in my message.
> which would be, if I may ask?
The procmail recipes.
Without them, your entire thesis is invalid.
With them, it probably is still invalid.
xan
jonathon
--
Does your Office Suite conform to ISO Standards?
--
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 22:42:43 PM +, Jonathon Blake
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You conveniently ignored the critical thing in my message.
which would be, if I may ask?
> Post the procmail recipe that you think does what you claim can be done.
OK. Don't hold your breath since I have to pay
On Sunday 24 July 2005 16:32, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 15:12:39 PM +0100, CPHennessy
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I'm not sure what exact solution you were proposing but if it is an
> > automatic email to unsubscribed users, then yes, I do that
> > already.
>
> No, it's somet
Mrco wrote:
> Yes. I am seriously proposing to look, or at least put a request on the web
> pages, for somebody who can do it.
> I suggested something based on subject and sender, so it would work in
> i), iv), v) and vi).
You conveniently ignored the critical thing in my message.
Post the pro
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 16:42:22 PM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>OOC: If you hate this list so much, as you have aluded to so far
> >>and think we are conceited and don't know how to do things, why do
> >>you stay here?
> >
> >Since you and many others are probably wondering
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 13:43:25 PM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
OOC: If you hate this list so much, as you have aluded to so far and
think we are conceited and don't know how to do things, why do you
stay here?
Since you and many others are probably won
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 22:19:11 PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It's an honour to side with Marco with such an opposition.
>
> And since it seems you won't let the matter rest, and I'll have to
> answer before you continue flooding the list :
>
> the reason I've not unsubscr
The filter can be used with 1.0 versions, but is unnecessary for beta
2.0 versions.
Hope you subscribed to the list since there was some useful discussion on this.
/paul
On 7/22/05, Thomas Harries, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Paul,
>
> I assume that I can patch the filter into
Larry Gusaas írta:
This "discussion ?" has wasted far more bandwidth than duplicate messages ever
did.
- -
Larry Gusaas,
Moose Jaw, Sask.
http://larry-gusaas.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 13:56:19 PM -0600, Rigel
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Please help me to understand how over the course of 24 hours, we can
> have 38 messages, all dedicated to a single thread on an argument
> about replying to e-mails of users not on the list?
Having single threads burst to
Please help me to understand how over the course of 24 hours, we can
have 38 messages, all dedicated to a single thread on an argument about
replying to e-mails of users not on the list?
I still don't understand why we are arguing about the "philosophy" of
the act, when this is a technical lis
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 15:20:45 PM -0400, Chad Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> First off, Marco, I think Peter was not speaking to you in that case,
> but the other bitching guy, who hasn't said as much as you, but all he
> said was negative, much like you. You may have realized that, and
> deci
On 24 Jul 2005 at 13:02, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> This "discussion ?" has wasted far more bandwidth than duplicate
> messages ever did.
> - -
+1
Can we call an end to this now?
and BTW, I have found it very easy to configure the spam filter in my
Pegasus email client to drop these "duplicate" m
Chad:
on 07/24/05 14:20 'Chad Smith' wrote:
[snip]
The only drawback is that
annoys *YOU*. And, I for one, am willing to live with that
ineffectiveness.
Priceless. Thank you.
oldgnome
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
First off, Marco, I think Peter was not speaking to you in that case,
but the other bitching guy, who hasn't said as much as you, but all he
said was negative, much like you. You may have realized that, and
decided to answer anyway, on your own behalf. Your wording seems to
be able to go either w
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 13:43:25 PM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> OOC: If you hate this list so much, as you have aluded to so far and
> think we are conceited and don't know how to do things, why do you
> stay here?
Since you and many others are probably wondering the same
This "discussion ?" has wasted far more bandwidth than duplicate messages ever
did.
- -
Larry Gusaas,
Moose Jaw, Sask.
http://larry-gusaas.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 7/24/05, Peter Kupfer OOo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chad Smith wrote:
>> So may
> > be poor, so what? I make less than $20,000 a year
> > -Chad Smith
>
> What about all the kickbacks from MS for supporting their products in
> the open source/Linux world? Huh? :)
Well, if I don't report it
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le dimanche 24 juillet 2005 à 11:31 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo a écrit :
2) Everyone (save maybe Nicolas) agrees that unsubscribed posters should
get a copy of the message.
Contrary to what seems to be the general opinion on this list other
people do deal with user quest
Chad Smith wrote:
On 7/24/05, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/24/05, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for knowing my bank balance, job status, problems and fixed
expenses so much better than me.
And what the hell does your money have to do with it, anyway? So may
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 17:31:58 PM +, Jonathon Blake
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Mrco wrote:
>
> > No, it's something else, which is complementary to what you are already
> > doing:
>
> So it took 50 or so messages to get to this point:
>
> > 1) Unsubscribed user posts to list
> > 2) procma
Mrco wrote:
> No, it's something else, which is complementary to what you are already doing:
So it took 50 or so messages to get to this point:
> 1) Unsubscribed user posts to list
> 2) procmail recognizes that message as coming from unsubscribed user, and
> memorizes subject and original unsub
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 13:17:01 PM -0400, Chad Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On 7/24/05, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/24/05, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for knowing my bank balance, job status, problems and fixed
> > > expenses so much better than
on 07/24/05 12:07 'M. Fioretti' wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 12:36:31 PM -0400, Chad Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
if *YOU MARCO* won't do it, why the hell should anyone else?
As already said, I have no computer which I can leave online 24/7, and
this is not going to change.
Is this co
Le dimanche 24 juillet 2005 à 11:31 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo a écrit :
> 2) Everyone (save maybe Nicolas) agrees that unsubscribed posters should
> get a copy of the message.
Contrary to what seems to be the general opinion on this list other
people do deal with user questions in a nice manner. M
On 7/24/05, Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/24/05, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for knowing my bank balance, job status, problems and fixed
> > expenses so much better than me.
And what the hell does your money have to do with it, anyway? So may
be poor, so wh
On 7/24/05, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for knowing my bank balance, job status, problems and fixed
> expenses so much better than me.
You seem to know everyone else's on the list. You seem to know that
everyone on the list has one of these computers with always on access.
Y
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 11:31:35 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think this is my last post because we are going in circles. I am going
> to make the following conclusions. If am wrong please let me know.
>
> 1) The overall issue seems to lie in the collabnet software tha
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 12:36:31 PM -0400, Chad Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> if *YOU MARCO* won't do it, why the hell should anyone else?
As already said, I have no computer which I can leave online 24/7, and
this is not going to change.
Is this concept *too* technical for you?
If the idea is
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 11:15:21 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Thank you for finally posting the proposed solution. I realize you
> posted it 15 months ago, but the archives are down. You would think
> we could have saved a lot of time if you just would have done this
> at
On 7/24/05, M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 15:12:39 PM +0100, CPHennessy
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what exact solution you were proposing but if it is an
> > automatic email to unsubscribed users, then yes, I do that
> > already.
>
> No, it's s
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 11:09:36 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Gee, about 1.5 months ago, CPH asked/begged for more volunteers to
> moderate, and I didn't hear you raising your hand our offering to
> help.
IIRC, I was unsubscribed at that time, being on vacation. If I had
s
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 01:14:23 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
3) Kill list me -- Doesn't really change anything, but you won't know I
am doing this.
It changes a lot. Nothing personal here, but do you know how email
works? I don't want to ignore all o
T. D. Roe wrote:
A quick request: One thing that Powerpoint does that OO has yet to do
is gives the option to save and Impress sheet in .jpg, .png, .gif or
bmp. That has come in handy to me several times and the ONLY reason I
go back to Powerpoint every once in a while.
Wonderful work!
I wi
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 15:12:39 PM +0100, CPHennessy
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm not sure what exact solution you were proposing but if it is an
automatic email to unsubscribed users, then yes, I do that
already.
No, it's something else, which is complementary to what yo
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 01:32:36 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yes. This is why I explained 15 months ago, and repeated yesterday,
that it requires "Only a one time setup by one regular OO.o
contributor" (those who you in another message defined better a
As you are not subscribed, you may have missed this post.
Graham Lauder wrote:
Carlo Strata wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am a registrered user and an issue submitter.
In the link from which I use to download new builds and associated
language
packs:
http://oootranslation.services.openoffice.org/p
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 15:12:39 PM +0100, CPHennessy
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm not sure what exact solution you were proposing but if it is an
> automatic email to unsubscribed users, then yes, I do that
> already.
No, it's something else, which is complementary to what you are
already doing
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 15:06:46 PM +0100, CPHennessy
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> However as can very easily be seen from many emails from
> unsubscribed posters their grasp of PC technology many not be that
> good.
CPH,
glad you stepped in, I also hope to save some of your future time with
all
On Sunday 24 July 2005 08:08, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 01:32:36 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >Yes. This is why I explained 15 months ago, and repeated yesterday,
> > >that it requires "Only a one time setup by one regular OO.o
> > >contributor" (tho
On Sunday 24 July 2005 09:57, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 01:23 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
> > Ian Lynch wrote:
> > > BTW, I think you are wrong and he is right. Thoughtfulness and
> > > politeness cost very little, but then I am a bit old-fashioned like
> > > that.
> >
> > That is
Carlo Strata wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am a registrered user and an issue submitter.
In the link from which I use to download new builds and associated language
packs:
http://oootranslation.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/680m118/
there are not the windows versions of the language pack
Hi Everyone,
I am a registrered user and an issue submitter.
In the link from which I use to download new builds and associated language
packs:
http://oootranslation.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/680m118/
there are not the windows versions of the language packs as usual.
Is there a
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 01:28:51 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Fred Atkinson wrote:
> >>My foot. I have sent *one* short, clear, polite request after 12/15
> >>messages like this in one week. If you generate further traffic
> >>because you didn't get it is not my fault.
> >
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 09:58:57 AM +0100, Ian Lynch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 01:16 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
> >
> > Is ignoring a new user and giving them a response without
> > overwhelming them good manners?
>
> Its not necessary to ignore them. Marco is, I believ
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 01:16 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
> Ian Lynch wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 15:12 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
> >>Please end your campaign for control of other people's email, and stop
> >>this annoying ranting.
> >
> >
> > Good manners and etiquette annoying? I didn't de
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 01:23 -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
> Ian Lynch wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I think you are wrong and he is right. Thoughtfulness and
> > politeness cost very little, but then I am a bit old-fashioned like
> > that.
> That is why the responses to the OP are so critical.
But he is
T. D. Roe wrote:
A quick request: One thing that Powerpoint does that OO has yet to do
is gives the option to save and Impress sheet in .jpg, .png, .gif or
bmp. That has come in handy to me several times and the ONLY reason I
go back to Powerpoint every once in a while.
Wonderful work!
You
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 01:32:36 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Yes. This is why I explained 15 months ago, and repeated yesterday,
> >that it requires "Only a one time setup by one regular OO.o
> >contributor" (those who you in another message defined better as "high
> >ran
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 01:27:02 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Figure me for disagreeing. But the very action you are blasting, is
> what makes OOo special. Users that care about other users and rarely
> give a RTFM answer.
>
You are confusing the *method* with which answ
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 01:25:34 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> >Seriously. My solution has *nothing* to do with what you said (even
> >in your first reply) and requires ZERO effort, or awareness of its
> >operation by any list user, subscribed or not. On
56 matches
Mail list logo
