Hi,
We're even in the midst of a contradiction shift as we speak. Check out
the PIM discussion in the [discuss] Regarding OpenOffice Suite thread.
The original code for OOo included a PIM.
A PIM was available as an add on for OOo 1.0.
[Guess what, it even works with 2.0!]
What has
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:53:58 -0500, Chad Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/7/07, Alexandro Colorado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not aware of any active development on this project, there might
be a
project like so. But that doesnt mean it will be in production anytime
soon afaik.
*** on about the punctuation in an email just makes you look
like a smartass. Not that the other posts don't help.
Umm, *** on about being disinterested in clear and correct use of
language makes you look like an idiot.
Enough, both of you!
The quoted article does not say it is
On 2007-04-07, Alvin Lim Liangce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, what did MS do as a corporation that is morally wrong?
Where to begin? Remember when they stole Stacker's disk compression
technology for their drivespace feature in MS-DOS v6.2? The courts
ruled MS had to issue a new version
André Wyrwa wrote:
Maybe you should tell that all these guys that put wrong information on
various web pages, then:
They are redesigning the PIM.
xan
jonathon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Michael Adams said on 08.04.2007 15:59:
*** on about the punctuation in an email just makes you look
like a smartass. Not that the other posts don't help.
Umm, *** on about being disinterested in clear and correct use of
language makes you look like an idiot.
Hey, you're
Peter Reaper wrote:
Michael Adams said on 08.04.2007 15:59:
clip /
The quoted article does not say it is mandatory in any way anywhere.
Yes it does. Re-read it. It says: *Separate* three or more items in a
series with a comma. That sounds pretty mandatory to me.
André Wyrwa wrote:
Hei,
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 00:01 +0800, Alvin Lim Liangce wrote:
Besides, what did MS do as a corporation that is morally wrong?
I'm generally with you, but they did in fact do some dodgy business
moves in the past (and continually keep doing) that could be seen as
Larry Gusaas said on 08.04.2007 21:48:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Michael Adams said on 08.04.2007 15:59:
clip /
The quoted article does not say it is mandatory in any way anywhere.
Yes it does. Re-read it. It says: *Separate* three or more items in a
series with a comma. That sounds pretty
On Monday 09 April 2007 07:13, Peter Reaper wrote:
Larry Gusaas said on 08.04.2007 21:48:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Michael Adams said on 08.04.2007 15:59:
clip /
The quoted article does not say it is mandatory in any way anywhere.
Yes it does. Re-read it. It says: *Separate* three or
On Monday 09 April 2007 04:46, Peter Reaper wrote:
Michael Adams said on 08.04.2007 15:59:
*** on about the punctuation in an email just makes you look
like a smartass. Not that the other posts don't help.
Umm, *** on about being disinterested in clear and correct use of
Peter Reaper wrote:
Larry Gusaas said on 08.04.2007 21:48:
Peter Reaper wrote:
Michael Adams said on 08.04.2007 15:59:
clip /
The quoted article does not say it is mandatory in any way anywhere.
Yes it does. Re-read it. It says: *Separate* three or more items in
a series with a comma.
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 14:15 -0400, John W. Kennedy wrote:
André Wyrwa wrote:
Hei,
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 00:01 +0800, Alvin Lim Liangce wrote:
Besides, what did MS do as a corporation that is morally wrong?
I'm generally with you, but they did in fact do some dodgy business
moves
Vince Castanza wrote:
Like all software approaching perfection (such as OpenOffice), we are occasionally humbled by our less than perfect hardware.
Recently, I was reminded of this fact when my system went into an unrecoverable hibernate
on my laptop and my Openoffice writer document went
14 matches
Mail list logo
