[discuss] Re: Manual available for OpenOffice.org 2.0

2005-11-05 Thread Johan Vromans
Doug Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Volunteers [...] have a God-given right [[asumption 1]] to be just a bit disgruntled when someone lifts their work [[assumption 2]] in order to make a personal profit [[assumption 3]] without returning anything to the community [[assumption 4]] that

[discuss] Re: Demand OpenDocument! Sign the petition.

2005-10-21 Thread Johan Vromans
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Microsoft has said that they will support OpenDocument in MS Office if there is customer demand for it. I must say that I really don't know whether this would be a good or a bad thing. I can easily imagine Microsoft supporting OpenDocument to the

[discuss] Re: Demand OpenDocument! Sign the petition.

2005-10-21 Thread Johan Vromans
Ian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There are enough knowledgeable people out there to make this too risky for MS to even contemplate. If their apps don't produce pure and clean ODF rest assured it will be all over the Internet within hours. Severe bugs in Windows and IE frequently hit the

[discuss] Re: Demand OpenDocument! Sign the petition.

2005-10-21 Thread Johan Vromans
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * People don't trust Microsoft now. They are under the radar of a lot of world governments, and people expect them to try dirty tricks. I'm afraid 99% of the PC users just use Microsoft software, and don't think about it. * OOo is the reference

[discuss] Re: TTF Fonts Installed Wierd Behavior

2005-10-20 Thread Johan Vromans
Carl Spitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does OOo make its own copies of the fonts? Where can I find this? If so, you can find them in the OpenOffice.org/user/fonts directory (where OpenOffice.org is you user dir). If you don't know what your user dir is, take a look at $HOME/.sversionrc HTH,

[discuss] Re: Article: Everybody's Guide to OpenDocument

2005-10-20 Thread Johan Vromans
M. Fioretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8616 A good read! Thanks. -- Johan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[discuss] Re: Back to relocating the rpms

2005-10-15 Thread Johan Vromans
mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was finally getting back to thinking about trying to install 2.0, RC2, and what someone here (thanks!) had mentioned about giving rpm a relocation location... and realized the problem. It's *still* going to run any final scripts, and it's going to set links.

[discuss] Re: Google - no thanks

2005-10-14 Thread Johan Vromans
Chad Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is far more serious, as Wikipedia is free??? What does that mean? When was the last time Google charged you for search results? Since when does a lack of cost increase its seriousness? Free as in speech. -- Johan

[discuss] Re: No setup or install w/ RC1|2

2005-10-10 Thread Johan Vromans
mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Morgan Olsson wrote: No answer to your question, but... Where did you find RC2? I thought RC1 or RC for short is the latest? I assume RC means the current RC, which currently is RC2. When I downloaded the RC, I got RC2. -- Johan

[discuss] Re: music program

2005-09-03 Thread Johan Vromans
Chris BONDE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have very briefly looked at LilyPond. What I saw I liked, but, I was intimidated. I know what you mean. LilyPond is quite impressive ;-). Will it fit into some MIDI so that it will play? Last time I looked, it could generate MIDI data. -- Johan

[discuss] Re: PDF file handling

2005-07-30 Thread Johan Vromans
Theodore Raphan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there any way to read PDF files directly with OpenOffice 2.0. Since it has such nice PDF writing capability, should it not have reading capabilities as well. If you mean that reading the PDF would result in the source document (or something alike):

[discuss] Re: Font size like 11.4

2005-07-11 Thread Johan Vromans
Alex Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, this issue has 1 vote. I'm surprised. I guess there's not very many people trying to use fractional sizes of fonts or that care. The voting system depends on the ability to mobilize people to vote for something, and not on sound reasoning whether a

[discuss] Re: Synaptics touch-pad scroll drop-out

2005-06-28 Thread Johan Vromans
Lawrence Millwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Typical of many notebook PCs I have a Synaptics touch-pad. I can use this in a number of applications to scroll up and down a page. However, in OpenOffice I find that the scroll feature becomes blocked. Have other users met this problem? Not on my

[discuss] Re: HBS WK: Who will win Microsoft or Linux?

2005-06-06 Thread Johan Vromans
Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There's too many corporate types that believe that price and quality of software are directly proportional. FLOSS is not about price and quality. FLOSS is about freedom. So the quote should probably read: There's too many corporate types that believe that

[discuss] Re: Openoffice vs MS Office Research

2005-05-26 Thread Johan Vromans
John William Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am going to be writing a White Paper about Openoffice and how it compares to the standard Microsoft Office for my professional writing class. This puzzles me. I'd have thought a professional writing class is about content and the tools to make

[discuss] Re: Reason corporates won't touch OO.o

2005-05-19 Thread Johan Vromans
cono [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I train people in groups of 4 to 6 persons. That takes them 4 hours. After that, they not only know where the differences between MsO and OOo are, they also have learnt: a - how to use an editor as it has to be done; (know how many time people lose day after

[discuss] Re: Java in OO.o: Proprietary trap or creative commons?

2005-05-05 Thread Johan Vromans
Ken Foskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 10:15 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote: So the question remains: will OOo be released 'built correctly' (not requiring _any_ Java), in multiple forms (with/without Java), or just with Java leaving the 'built correctly' version

[discuss] Re: Java in OO.o: Proprietary trap or creative commons?

2005-05-03 Thread Johan Vromans
Ken Foskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 17:41 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote: Does that mean that 2.0 will be shipped as a standalone binary, not requiring anything but the more or less standard libraries? If it is built correctly, I understand the answer to be yes. Obviously

[discuss] Re: Java in OO.o: Proprietary trap or creative commons?

2005-05-03 Thread Johan Vromans
Hi Joerg, Joerg Barfurth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does that mean that 2.0 will be shipped as a standalone binary, not requiring anything but the more or less standard libraries? It is shipped that way even now. Yes, since 1.x only uses Java for some optional features. Since 2.x requires

[discuss] Re: Type 1 fonts

2005-04-24 Thread Johan Vromans
Carl William Spitzer IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 04:00, Johan Vromans wrote: Profession font design tools can usually produce a font using Type 1, TTF or OTF, all of equal quality. Any of these tools for linux? You may wish to check out fontforge @ sourceforge

[discuss] Re: tabs as a new feature

2005-04-06 Thread Johan Vromans
Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. now and then i have a need to write documents that consist roughly half text, hals spreadsheet. i usually end up with two documents, because it's a lot easier to manage them separately. if we had such a (let's call it .odm, as some poster already suggested -

[discuss] Re: Java fallout: OO.o 2.0 and the FOSS community

2005-03-29 Thread Johan Vromans
Enrique [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The name is OpenOffice.org. Let me stress *Open* and *org* The FLOSS community is not just another target. and that possible losses in the FLOSS community will be reverted when, in some later stage, OOos requirement for Java can be fulfilled by GCJ.

[discuss] Re: Java fallout: OO.o 2.0 and the FOSS community

2005-03-29 Thread Johan Vromans
Christian Einfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On the other hand, I also see that one person commented that Apache uses Java, or can use Java, and so I'm not sure whether the concerns are overstated. There's a significant distinction between using Java for added features (e.g., to drive Java

[discuss] Re: OT: Bill Gates... Good or Evil?

2005-03-25 Thread Johan Vromans
Justin Clift [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.ultimatejudgment.com/Bill-Gates I don't think OOo will benefit from this. -- Johan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

[discuss] Re: OOo 2.0 Show Stoppers?

2005-02-18 Thread Johan Vromans
Eric Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 4. Parsing textual delimited files no matter the extension still opens in Writer instead of auto-parsing into Calc. Quattro and Excel do this and only Calc can't do this smoothly. A textual file is a textual file, meaning text. One of the biggest problems

[discuss] Re: OOo 2.0 Show Stoppers?

2005-02-18 Thread Johan Vromans
Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wrote: Text files will be opened in writer. A CSV file is a text file. Correction: it turns out that when I rename the file to .csv extension, it _is_ opened in calc (well, the calc CSV importer). Additionally soffice -Calc foo.bar will try to open

[discuss] Re: The price of Free Software

2005-02-07 Thread Johan Vromans
Manolis Christodoulou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Imagine the situation whenI run a Firefox window with a java applet inside, an OOo Writer, and a GIMP instance at the same time under Windows XP. This is very common to people like me who prefere to use free software. How many graphics libraries

[discuss] Re: Microsoft opens Office formats

2005-02-03 Thread Johan Vromans
Peter Kupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...in a grander sense, if MS does open its format and keeps it that way, ... which I do not believe until I've seen it. -- Johan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For