[discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Chuck
Lars D. Noodén wrote: > OOo and OpenDocument both get a mention towards the middle of the article: > > Nigel McFarlane. "Firefox explorers." The Age. 22 Mar 2005. > > http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2005/03/21/253920087.html?oneclick=true > > > ... "I'm staggered and close to o

[discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-24 Thread Chuck
Smoot Carl-Mitchell wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 12:12 -0800, Christian Einfeldt wrote: > > >>High School, in Portland, Oregon. IMHO, the day is only about 3 >>years away when people will wonder why they ever paid for an office >>suite, just the way that people now wonder why they ever paid

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Daniel Carrera
Chuck wrote: > I have OOo installed on my laptop and love it (don't tell my workstation > support group though or they'll remove it as "unsupported software"). > When I buy my new XP home PC this week, OOo will be installed and not MS > or Corel. But I wouldn't dare save a shared document at work

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Christian Einfeldt
Hi, Sorry for not snipping, but I wanted to be able to preserve the full context. On Wednesday 23 March 2005 08:26, Chuck wrote: > Lars D. Noodén wrote: > > OOo and OpenDocument both get a mention towards the middle of > > the article: > > > > Nigel McFarlane. "Firefox explorers." The Age. 2

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Ian Lynch
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 16:50, Daniel Carrera wrote: > Chuck wrote: > > > I have OOo installed on my laptop and love it (don't tell my workstation > > support group though or they'll remove it as "unsupported software"). > > When I buy my new XP home PC this week, OOo will be installed and not MS >

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Daniel Carrera
Ian Lynch wrote: > Since Solaris has been open sourced, why switch to Linux? Just curious > really. is there a difference in support costs or something? Or are > there apps that run on Linux but not Solaris? We need to replace these computers, and we want to go to x86 hardware because it's cheap

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Mensaje citado por Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 16:50, Daniel Carrera wrote: > > Chuck wrote: > > > > > I have OOo installed on my laptop and love it (don't tell my workstation > > > support group though or they'll remove it as "unsupported software"). > > > When I buy my

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Daniel Carrera
Alexandro Colorado wrote: > Yes solaris or slowaris like some users call them is indeed a closed source OS > and just recentley 'partially' opened. They are not GPL and not even OSI > standard license. Uhmm... it is definitely an OSI license. I don't know what you mean by "standard". If you mean

RE: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Justin Fitzgibbon
>one responsible for corrupting a file that 20 other people are using and >have to explain why I was using OOo instead of Word or Excel to my boss. >From my experience OOo is likely to recover a document that can't be opened in word anymore rather than corrupt it, especially version 2. With diff

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-23 Thread Smoot Carl-Mitchell
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 12:12 -0800, Christian Einfeldt wrote: > High School, in Portland, Oregon. IMHO, the day is only about 3 > years away when people will wonder why they ever paid for an office > suite, just the way that people now wonder why they ever paid for a > browser. (I actually pai

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-24 Thread =?iso-8859-15?Q?Lars_D=2E_Nood=E9n?=
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Christian Einfeldt wrote: ... Currently, Microsoft's solution is to try to "buy" the market by "lobbying" (bribing) local officials, giving its software to some libraries and schools, and offering package deals to governments like Thailand. But that is not a sustainable busines

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-24 Thread Cyrille Moureaux
Hi Daniel, Since Solaris has been open sourced, why switch to Linux? Just curious really. is there a difference in support costs or something? Or are there apps that run on Linux but not Solaris? We need to replace these computers, and we want to go to x86 hardware because it's cheaper. Since we

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-24 Thread =?iso-8859-15?Q?Lars_D=2E_Nood=E9n?=
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Chuck wrote: [...] I think the problem is that nobody wants to be the manager who recommended software that was later found out to have some incompatibility with MS file formats, the format that 98% of the rest of the business world uses. Perhaps, but since there are severe inc

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-24 Thread Smoot Carl-Mitchell
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 03:58 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote: > Also, remember that many IT departments have had the functional equivalent > of an MS sales team working on the inside since 5 or 6 years ago. So they > will be resisitant to other vendors / sources, but as Christian points out > with

Re: [discuss] Re: OOo and OpenDocument mentioned in TheAge

2005-03-24 Thread Ian Lynch
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 18:27, Chuck wrote: > Smoot Carl-Mitchell wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 12:12 -0800, Christian Einfeldt wrote: > > > > > >>High School, in Portland, Oregon. IMHO, the day is only about 3 > >>years away when people will wonder why they ever paid for an office > >>suite,