, February 25, 2008 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: Re: .doc compatibility
Jonathon,
I am afraid I will have to disagree. I can provide links to MSO
documents made very professionally using styles throughout that still
don't
convert nicely in OOo. Indentations for example
... ;)
J.R.
- Original Message -
From: Michele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: Re: .doc compatibility
Jonathon,
I am afraid I will have to disagree. I can provide links to MSO
documents made
: Monday, February 25, 2008 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: Re: .doc compatibility
Jonathon,
I am afraid I will have to disagree. I can provide links to MSO
documents made very professionally using styles throughout that still
don't
convert nicely in OOo. Indentations
On Mon, February 25, 2008 7:51 am, jonathon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:14 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
- being sent to MS Office users who edit it as they please
If the users did use styles with MSO, those styles would be available
in ODF, albeit with a different name.
If they did not
If the users did use styles with MSO, those styles would be available
in ODF, albeit with a different name.
Hello Jonathon,
I am afraid I will have to disagree. I can provide links to MSO documents
made very professionally using styles throughout that still don't convert
nicely in OOo.
On Monday 25 February 2008 21:37:53 M. Fioretti wrote:
On Mon, February 25, 2008 7:51 am, jonathon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:14 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
- being sent to MS Office users who edit it as they please
If the users did use styles with MSO, those styles would be available
andreas moroder wrote:
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 17:49:42 PM +, jonathon wrote:
(four times)
Styles are not being correctly used.
since this, even outside of this thread, is one of the most frequent
issues, then maybe OOo/ODF styles are very poorly advertised and
Michele wrote:
I am afraid I will have to disagree. I can provide links to MSO documents
made very professionally using styles throughout that still don't convert
nicely in OOo. Indentations for example are not correct, outline numbering
disappears (and with it the ToC) and so on.
*
Jonathon,
I am afraid I will have to disagree. I can provide links to MSO
documents made very professionally using styles throughout that still don't
convert nicely in OOo. Indentations for example are not correct, outline
numbering disappears (and with it the ToC) and so on.
*
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 17:49:42 PM +, jonathon wrote:
(four times)
Styles are not being correctly used.
since this, even outside of this thread, is one of the most frequent
issues, then maybe OOo/ODF styles are very poorly advertised and
documented, but this is a
On Monday 25 February 2008 07:29:22 andreas moroder wrote:
M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 17:49:42 PM +, jonathon wrote:
(four times)
Styles are not being correctly used.
since this, even outside of this thread, is one of the most frequent
issues, then maybe OOo/ODF
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 09:13:41 AM +1300, Graham Lauder wrote:
As Jonathon noted, training in the use of Stylist would probably
have sorted the issue.
I had asked explicitly:
M. Fioretti wrote:
maybe this is not really a case where OOo/ODF styles aren't
correctly used: this is a case
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:14 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
- being sent to MS Office users who edit it as they please
If the users did use styles with MSO, those styles would be available
in ODF, albeit with a different name.
If they did not use styles, then expecting OOo to recognize
non-existing
13 matches
Mail list logo
