On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 15:16 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
As long as OO.o limits itself to java features _already_ reimplemented
by free vms everything is ok (and note that it was not the case for
OO.o 2 features - people had to crash-write some gcj features so OO.o
could stay available.
Ken Foskey a crit :
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 15:16 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
As long as OO.o limits itself to java features _already_ reimplemented
by free vms everything is ok (and note that it was not the case for
OO.o 2 features - people had to crash-write some gcj features so OO.o
could
Ken Foskey wrote:
Glad to see you turn up Simon. This whole argument is now just
academic. Caolan has provide a GCJ port that will allow, as I understand
it, all features to run. Therefore this is really a non-issue for beta
2.0.
Really? Cool. Go Caolan!
This is something we should advertise
Daniel Carrera a crit :
Ken Foskey wrote:
I do think we need to ensure that The SO programmers avoid proprietary
Java extensions in their changes. I believe that all programmers are
endeavouring to manage this. This will allow continued GCJ support.
+1
There definitely seem to be some
On Ven 29 avril 2005 1:47, Christian Einfeldt a écrit :
On Thursday 28 April 2005 07:28, M. Fioretti wrote:
Interview by C. Einfeldt to Sun Microsystems evangelist Simon
Phipps:
Thanks for noticing this article, Marco! I included a link to the
article about Java in OOo by Bruce Byfield,
On Friday 29 April 2005 01:25, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
On Ven 29 avril 2005 1:47, Christian Einfeldt a écrit :
On Thursday 28 April 2005 07:28, M. Fioretti wrote:
Interview by C. Einfeldt to Sun Microsystems evangelist Simon
Phipps:
Thanks for noticing this article, Marco! I included a
Interview by C. Einfeldt to Sun Microsystems evangelist Simon Phipps:
http://madpenguin.org/cms/html/62/4023.html
Ciao,
Marco F.
--
Marco Fiorettimfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
Human
