On Apr 17, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
The third is consistency between preview and symbol. At least on Windows most
file previews don't only show the content of the file, but the application
symbol at the lower right corner. This additional information helps not only
to know
Hi Cor, *
Cor Nouws schrieb:
Bernhard Dippold wrote (14-04-10 00:52)
Cor Nouws schrieb:
[...]
Looks as if you ask the council to reconsider the decision (...) to
not change further on the product-independent odf icons.
Not exactly:
I ask the council to decide on the change itself: Is it
Hi Cor, *
Cor Nouws schrieb:
[...]
About open questions: I wonder if you/others have links to threads /
posts on project lists where there has been discussion about this
aspect of the icons.
There has been quite a number of threads on disc...@ux, including a
summary of the discussion on
On 04/14/2010 12:15 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I don't want to discuss the design of the icons here - it's about their
basics:
Bernhard, please read up on the interoperability goals of ODF, that
might help you catch up.
In general, a fundamental goal of a universal document format is that
Thank you, that is a good choice, Bernhard: Lead, follow, or get out of the
way.
Regards
/Lars
That cuts both way Lar's. If you have ODF over OO.o as your goals then
perhaps you should move over to the oasis team and let those want to work on
this office suite proceed with what they feel
Re-read my message, Drew.
Breaking from normal icon schemes by providing non-standard icons for
standard formats is bad marketing for OOo because it implies that
somehow OOo might not be using real ODF and instead using a broken
version, like M$ Office does. Having icons tied to the
Hi Lars,
Lars Nooden wrote (16-04-10 13:45)
Your colleagues at M$ and branches of M$ like Novell support the same
divisiveness of the data formats. ODF is for all productivity suites.
I don't think it is reasonable or fair towards Bernard to somehow
suggest him being a colleague of MS
On 04/16/2010 05:28 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
I don't think it is reasonable or fair towards Bernard to somehow
suggest him being a colleague of MS guys.
Sorry, it must have been the content of his messages over time that gave
that illusion. We'll say it's a coincidence.
Regardless, the basics
Hi Lars,
Le 16.04.2010 13:45, Lars Nooden a écrit :
On 04/14/2010 12:15 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
I don't want to discuss the design of the icons here - it's about their
basics:
Bernhard, please read up on the interoperability goals of ODF, that
might help you catch up.
In general, a
Hi Cor, all
I changed the subject, because I want to follow your proposal to
position my concerns officially at the Community Council, while keeping
in this thread in order to inform the community about this specific request.
*Please don't support the application independency of the ODF
Hi Cor,
Cor Nouws schrieb:
Hi Bernard, *,
Bernhard Dippold wrote (13-04-10 23:25)
I changed the subject, because I want to follow your proposal to
position my concerns officially at the Community Council, while
keeping in this thread in order to inform the community about this
specific
11 matches
Mail list logo
