Chad Smith wrote:
On 10/27/05, cono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw a message from you passing swifty to my bin ;-) You wrote that you
do indeed support OOo. Well, no doubt about that from me.
As I see your role: you want to prevent people from being to naive,
eye-shelved, optimistic,
Hi Chad,
cono wrote:
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:40 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
You still around, Chad? I thought you would have taken the hint by now
seeing that everyone else apart from you in this group sees ODF's
success as important to OOo's success. If you can't be
On 10/27/05, cono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw a message from you passing swifty to my bin ;-) You wrote that you
do indeed support OOo. Well, no doubt about that from me.
As I see your role: you want to prevent people from being to naive,
eye-shelved, optimistic, unrealistic etc.
Doing
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 15:31 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
I also get upset (since you claimed that is what I do) by people constantly
claiming I have some sort of learning disability,
The solution is simple, Chad, demonstrate to all those people that you
haven't.
--
Ian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars wrote:
It would be useful to pin down the sources and specifics of the basis for
Pacheco's claims. (e.g. which disability groups and what have they been
made upset about)
The article
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/25/galvin_attacks_software_proposal
says that
On 10/26/05, Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The article
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/25/galvin_attacks_software_proposal
says that blind office workers are saying they're worried they won't be
able to use it. I looked into this a bit.
snip
Has anyone on
Marco Fioretti wrote:
Any Massachussetts registered voters could help out by contacting
their governor, secretary of state and their representative in the
state senate regarding this issue:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/25/HNstateopendoc_1.html
It would be useful to pin down the
Anybody who goes to this meeting will think it's important. Just
because it's not on the grand scale doesn't mean people don't think
it's important. If someone was to hand out fliers it would be for the
specific meeting not around town.
On 10/26/05, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 07:37 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Has anyone on this list tested screen readers like
JAWS with OpenOffice 2.0 to verify whether the complains
in the two messages I linked to are still real?
What are the real system requirements?
Can someone find out and update
On 10/26/05, Ian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If MS support ODF it isn't an issue as this would be a good sales
proposition for sticking with MS Office even if it and OOo have
interchangeable files. If MS don't support ODF and the community,
including the big companies ensure that OOo has
On 10/26/05, Ian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:40 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
You still around, Chad? I thought you would have taken the hint by now
seeing that everyone else apart from you in this group sees ODF's
success as important to OOo's success. If you can't be
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 10:55:50 AM -0400, Chuck ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I don't think non IT-savvy citizens give a hoot about this issue
and would probably look at you funny if you tried to hand out
fliers. :-(
By this line of reasoning, it's hard to see why one should bother to
use or know
Ian Lynch wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 11:40 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
You still around, Chad? I thought you would have taken the hint by now
seeing that everyone else apart from you in this group sees ODF's
success as important to OOo's success. If you can't be constructive in
supporting this
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:22 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
And, if ODF is so all consuming, why would you *want* Microsoft to support
it? If ODF is all that matters about OOo, as soon as MSO supports it, OOo is
dead, right? I mean, if ODF success is the only key to OOo success - then if
MSO has it,
On 10/26/05, Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone on this list tested screen readers like
JAWS with OpenOffice 2.0 to verify whether the complains
in the two messages I linked to are still real?
What are the real system requirements?
Can someone find out and update
On 10/26/05, Adam Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to download the JAWS software and try it out on openoffice.
I then compared it with MS Excel and it read pretty much the same way.
Their were a couple of differences.
1) When you click on an item in the toolbar of excel it read you
16 matches
Mail list logo
