Are you sure? Last time I checked, the RPi3 could not perform realtime
(quite simple) filtering at 10 MHz. I doubt it can handle the 20 MSPS of
the 802.11.
On 12/12/2016 09:01 PM, Eric Yates wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the quick response. The RPi 3 had enough processing power
to receive a me
Dear Marcus,
Thank you for your response.
My objective is to send multiple streams of data. For example a transmitter
to use two different streams to talk to two receivers. I was thinking
something similar to Frequency Division Multiplexing, where each stream is
represented using a different sub
Dear Damindra,
To me, that sounds like a higher-level problem – ie. you can send
whatever you want across your OFDM link, and that includes e.g. ethernet
or IP packets with different destinations; that would make things more
flexible – you wouldn't have to statically assign a set of carriers to a
Dear Marcus,
Thank you for your suggestion. However, according to my use case, I cannot
do multiple transmissions at a higher layer.
I have few questions about the "OFDM Carrier Allocator."
1- Can current "OFDM Carrier Allocator" support multiple streams using
multiple channels, or you sugges
Assuming that is reproducible, does anyone have suggestions on how to get
around it?
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Dave NotTelling wrote:
> Here is a full example:
>
> [code]
>
> #!/usr/bin/python
>
> import pmt
>
> d = pmt.make_dict()
> d = pmt.dict_add(d, pmt.intern('a'), pmt.intern('a'))
>
Hi Damindra
On 13.12.2016 23:42, Damindra Bandara wrote:
> Dear Marcus,
>
> Thank you for your suggestion. However, according to my use case, I
> cannot do multiple transmissions at a higher layer.
>
I kind of doubt that - you're writing your own OFDM transceiver right
now, and thus you're the o
Dear Marcus,
Thank you very much for being patient with me and answering all my
questions. I have one last question. Is there a good reference you could
recommend me to read, to understand how the current GNURadio OFDM
implementation works?
Best regards,
Damindra
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:10 PM,
On https://kb.ettus.com/RFNoC_Getting_Started_Guides it says
"We will be updating the default image occasionally, and you can run
uhd_images_downloader again after running git pull and re-installing."
1. What would I be pulling and re-installing (UHD)? If I opt not to
configure a github account,
I'd agree that your code is not behaving as expected. Don't have
something off the top of my head though :/
M
On 12/13/2016 02:51 PM, Dave NotTelling wrote:
> Assuming that is reproducible, does anyone have suggestions on how to
> get around it?
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Dave NotTellin
They're both deprecated. Maybe this helps:
https://archive.fosdem.org/2014/schedule/event/tutorial_ofdm_packet_transceivers/
Cheers,
M
On 12/12/2016 10:20 AM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for your response. Are benchmark_tx and benchmark_rx both
> deprecated ? And is there a
Did a fresh Pybombs install today. Everything pybombs and gnuradio seems to be
really working well lately. Great work guys.
I noticed that the UHD recipes seem to be yanking from 3.09 rather than the
August release of 3.10.
Not complaining; It will give me a chance to modify a recipe.
Is “LT
On 12/13/2016 02:53 PM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
Hi,
Can you kindly tell me how to do that? Because I am using GNU Radio
with the USRP N210 and the uhd sink block basically consists of the
parameters for configuring the USRP device. How can I do that during
simulation?
Thanks!
This is a
12 matches
Mail list logo