Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Running GMSK mod/demod test

2013-08-13 Thread Florian Schlembach
To put it in simple words, I am wondering why the GMSK-Mod blocks always outputs 8192 bits - no matter when I input 50 bits or 255 bits. Is there a GMSK-burst-like modulation happening? ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org

[Discuss-gnuradio] Running GMSK mod/demod test

2013-08-12 Thread Florian Schlembach
I trying to run a GMSK mod/demod test under GRC. My objective is to create a single GSM-like burst and to store it in a file. The waveform should have defined bits (by now I assume them to be random). Thus I created a flowgraph that looks like this Random Source (fixed # of samples, no

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Performing callback function in GRC

2013-05-28 Thread Florian Schlembach
Perhaps it would work better to treat the input as one variable. Use a tuple of numbers instead. You can make a text entry widget w/ converter type Evaluate. The callback would probably look more like this: callbackset_user_register(*\$user_reg_args)/callback -josh Thanks, thats already a

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Performing callback function in GRC

2013-05-28 Thread Florian Schlembach
Perhaps it would work better to treat the input as one variable. Use a tuple of numbers instead. You can make a text entry widget w/ converter type Evaluate. The callback would probably look more like this: callbackset_user_register(*\$user_reg_args)/callback -josh Thanks, thats already a

[Discuss-gnuradio] Performing callback function in GRC

2013-05-27 Thread Florian Schlembach
I am trying to build a flow graph in GNU Radio Companion consisting of a USRP source block and a FFT sink. During runtime, I would like to send a user settings register to the USRP. Fortunately, everything is already employed so I only need to build some sort of variable control. By now, that

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Benchmark Tx Issue?

2012-02-21 Thread Florian Schlembach
Are you seeing the 1 MHz offset when you use the uhd_siggen.py? Or is it just with the OFDM transmitter? What is this tool doing? Transmitting a sine and checking the offset. Sorry, for the moment I have no possibilitie to check that. It's because with the larger bandwidth, the subcarriers,

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Benchmark Tx Issue?

2012-02-21 Thread Florian Schlembach
There is a coarse and a fine frequency offset correction. The fine correct makes sure that the subcarrier is centered in the bin; the coarse adjusts for an integer number of subcarriers off from the center frequency. By default, the OFDM receiver will correct for some number of subcarrier bins

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OFDM Benchmark Tx Issue?

2012-02-20 Thread Florian Schlembach
I highly suspect it's user error :) but I'm truly at a loss right now as to the error. Michael, we encountered a very similar issue and spent already a lot of time on that. Configuration is the same except we are using an USRP2 though. We also did not receive anything at the RX side

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RX-TX Switching delay on XCVR2400?

2012-02-06 Thread Florian Schlembach
I found something on the mailinglist that there might also be SEND_MODE_ONE_PACKET function beside the SEND_MODE_FULL_BUFF but actually it affects nothing as I replace it in the gr_uhd_usrp_sink.cc (after recompling etc.). In another thread it was mentioned that the transmitting buffer is not

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RX-TX Switching delay on XCVR2400?

2012-02-03 Thread Florian Schlembach
Please don't e-mail the same question to the list in multiple threads - it actually makes it more difficult for people to help you in a coherent manner. Sorry, I thought about to specify that a little bit more to make it findable more easily afterwards. It is possible that tunnel.py is

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Running tunnel.py/benchmark tx.py (OFDM) with XCVR2450?

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Schlembach
The XCVR2450 hardware is incapable of full-duplex operation. It *cannot* transmit and receive at the same time. Yes, you are right but consider we are transmitting ping requests just for a very short moment (since they are also containing only 84 bytes) with a frequency of 1 Hz. Hence, we are

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Running tunnel.py/benchmark tx.py (OFDM) with XCVR2450?

2012-02-01 Thread Florian Schlembach
We are now trying to establish an TCP/IP connection between both USRP2s with the tunnel.py script. Unfortunately, it says Destination Host unreachable when pinging the other USRP. We should have set up the tunnel correct as some packets are received and transmitted after having configured the IP

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Running tunnel.py/benchmark tx.py (OFDM) with XCVR2450?

2012-02-01 Thread Florian Schlembach
We are now trying to establish an TCP/IP connection between both USRP2s with the tunnel.py script. Unfortunately, it says Destination Host unreachable when pinging the other USRP. We should have set up the tunnel correct as some packets are received and transmitted after having configured the IP

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Running tunnel.py/benchmark_tx.py (OFDM) with XCVR2450?

2012-01-31 Thread Florian Schlembach
But fiddling with gain values is often useful; even if you've already done that I recommend trying again, by reducing tx-amplitude and the actual gain values, shifting the terminals around (perhaps they're too close?). We have now found out that we need a sampling rate of at least 2Msps which

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Running tunnel.py/benchmark tx.py (OFDM) with XCVR2450?

2012-01-31 Thread Florian Schlembach
Ok, that definitely makes sense if there is no error correction is implemented. We are now trying to establish an TCP/IP connection between both USRP2s with the tunnel.py script. Unfortunately, it says Destination Host unreachable when pinging the other USRP. We should have set up the tunnel

[Discuss-gnuradio] Running tunnel.py/benchmark_tx.py (OFDM) with XCVR2450?

2012-01-25 Thread Florian Schlembach
Hey guys, we are trying to get run the tunnel.py / benchmark_rx.py (OFDM) in order to measure the datarate between two USRP2 (located with distance of 1 m) with daughterboards XCVR2450. We are running the benchmark_tx/rx.py as follows: benchmark_tx.py -f 2.4G --tx-gain=10 --tx-amplitude=0.8 -v