Ron's comment is very helpful, here's some more factoids:
On 23.09.2015 13:55, Richard Bell wrote:
> Sorry if these are obvious questions, but this is very not obvious to
> me. As I understand it right now, it's not even a question of copy and
> pasting files over to gr-analog, because that would
You can take a look at my last gr-dtv commit. It's very similar to what
you need to do.
https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/commit/b90c574e2fbf0443e1eea2ee06779c2a85f86def
Files to consider:
gr-dtv/grc/CMakeLists.txt
gr-dtv/grc/dtv_block_tree.xml
gr-dtv/lib/CMakeLists.txt
gr-dtv/swig/dtv_s
Sorry if these are obvious questions, but this is very not obvious to me.
As I understand it right now, it's not even a question of copy and pasting
files over to gr-analog, because that would overwrite the code for all the
other blocks, at least when it comes to swig. So let me outline what I need
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Richard Bell
wrote:
> When merging my OOT module with the forked GNU Radio base, should I hand
> copy the *.xml, *.h, *_impl.h, *_impl.cc, qa_*.cc and qa_*.h in the
> appropriate gr-analog folder locations, or should I just dump my entire OOT
> module into the top
When merging my OOT module with the forked GNU Radio base, should I hand
copy the *.xml, *.h, *_impl.h, *_impl.cc, qa_*.cc and qa_*.h in the
appropriate gr-analog folder locations, or should I just dump my entire OOT
module into the top level of the GNU Radio repo? I'm not familiar enough
with CMak
On 09/23/2015 02:07 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote:
I like keeping the algorithm logic in comments. I can't count how
many times I have optimized something, overwriting the original
readable code, then come back in a few months to discover I have no
idea how it works anymore.
Months? Weeks for me :)
I like keeping the algorithm logic in comments. I can't count how many
times I have optimized something, overwriting the original readable code,
then come back in a few months to discover I have no idea how it works
anymore.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:54 PM Martin Braun wrote:
> On 23.09.2015 10
On 23.09.2015 10:39, Richard Bell wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm in the process of submitting my first OOT module for merge with GNU
> Radio base. It's a log gain AGC which converges much faster then the
> current AGCs when the input signal energy is low. I've read through the
> following link:
>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Richard Bell
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm in the process of submitting my first OOT module for merge with GNU
> Radio base. It's a log gain AGC which converges much faster then the
> current AGCs when the input signal energy is low. I've read through the
> follo
Hey everyone,
I'm in the process of submitting my first OOT module for merge with GNU
Radio base. It's a log gain AGC which converges much faster then the
current AGCs when the input signal energy is low. I've read through the
following link:
https://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/Dev
10 matches
Mail list logo