[ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle

2008-02-18 Thread Peyton Todd
Hello again from the CF5 programmer trying to catch up. I always used to write for Internet Explorer, and did so again after my return to programming a few months ago, resulting in what is by now a rather complex site. Many CF (and other internet-based) programmers have told me since then that

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle

2008-02-18 Thread Peyton Todd
First, I believe I already have Firebug: when Firefox tells me I have an error (lower righthand corner) I can click on that and see lots of info about it; and which I click on the '^' in that panel, it morphs into a window with 'Firebug' in its title. But I don't see how that helps me with

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle

2008-02-18 Thread Steven Ross
I have been using YUI (yahoo) library, it works well and has some nice built in cross browser functionality. firefox supports getElementByID and the childNodes property... they performa a little differently than in IE. On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Peyton Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle

2008-02-18 Thread Dusty Hale
I escape this by avoiding JavaScript if possible or any script that relies on the browser and prefer to handle things on the server side. I guess sometimes you can't get around it though and that may not be logical for you. Dusty _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle

2008-02-18 Thread Douglas Knudsen
On Feb 18, 2008 10:11 AM, Peyton Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, I believe I already have Firebug: when Firefox tells me I have an error (lower righthand corner) I can click on that and see lots of info about it; and which I click on the '^' in that panel, it morphs into a window with

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle

2008-02-18 Thread Peyton Todd
Steven, did mean Firefox supports *parentNode* instead of getElementById? My Firefox always complains of an error whenever it sees getElementById. Or is there perhaps a different spelling for Firefox? (not likely, right?) The last letter in getElementById is lower case, not upper case as you have

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle

2008-02-18 Thread Steven Ross
never had any issues using getElementById (yes casing was wrong)... On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Peyton Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steven, did mean Firefox supports *parentNode* instead of getElementById? My Firefox always complains of an error whenever it sees getElementById. Or is

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle:Which Book?

2008-02-18 Thread Peyton Todd
I'm just about to head to the bookstore looking for an update to the O'Reilly book. I've always loved O'Reilly books. But real quick: Does anyone have a recommendation for some other book that would deal with which properties - methods - collections are supported by which browser?-Original

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle:Which Book?

2008-02-18 Thread Shifang (Frank) Sun
Another option might be to look at what these Javascript libraries have to offer: Prototype and script.aculo.us http://www.pragprog.com/titles/cppsu These are not just for UI niceties. They handle a lot of the browser issues correctly and transparently. On Feb 18, 2008 11:10 AM, Peyton Todd

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle

2008-02-18 Thread Peyton Todd
H. I'll definitely look into Spry. But just as a guess, that would mostly help me for future projects, right? Short of re-writing what I have done so far (a major task!), I still need to find a way our of my present dilemma. Lucky for me, this app is an INTRAnet just like all my previous ones

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle: Oh, they meant ID!

2008-02-18 Thread Peyton Todd
Red-faced, I am now compelled to report that my mistake with getElementById was that the elements reporting this error had no ID, but only a NAME. Duh! Internet Explorer evidently decided to be more forgiving on this point - at least that's my excuse for not noticing it...-Original

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle:Which Book?

2008-02-18 Thread Steven Ross
JQuery also looks nice... On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Shifang (Frank) Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another option might be to look at what these Javascript libraries have to offer: Prototype and script.aculo.us http://www.pragprog.com/titles/cppsu These are not just for UI niceties.

Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Another Question From Rip Van Winkle: Oh, they meant ID!

2008-02-18 Thread Steven Ross
You gotta love IE's interpretation of coding errors... i hate stuff like that. On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Peyton Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Red-faced, I am now compelled to report that my mistake with getElementById was that the elements reporting this error had no ID, but only a