wrote:
> I have no doubt that the problem must lie somewhere else …
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
> Ross
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:53 AM
>
>
> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
>
>
Hale < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I have no doubt that the problem must lie somewhere else …
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven> Ross> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:53 AM>
>> To: discussion@acfug.org> Subject: Re: [ACFUG D
half Of
Steven
Ross
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:53
AM
To:
discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting
issue
I just tested creating a
dummy query in my application cfm and dumping it in my iframe and it worked
fine...
On 7/24/06, Steven
Ross < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
6 8:53 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
I just tested creating a dummy query in my application cfm and
dumping it in my iframe and it worked fine...
On 7/24/06, Steven Ross < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorry useless point, have you tried gettin
I have no doubt that the problem must lie
somewhere else …
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of
Steven
Ross
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:53
AM
To:
discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting
issue
I just tested c
at the problem must lie
somewhere else …
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Steven
Ross
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:53
AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting
issue
I just tested creating a
dummy query in my application c
I have no doubt that the problem must lie
somewhere else …
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Ross
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:53
AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting
issue
I just tested creating a
a little fuzzy in my head ...>> Dusty
>> -Original Message-> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dean H.> Saxe> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:58 PM
> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
>> Whi
t scope?>> These are best practices I learned years ago with Hal Helms but it> has been> a while and could be a little fuzzy in my head ...>> Dusty
>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dean H.> Saxe> Sent:
t;> Dusty
>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dean H.> Saxe> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:58 PM
> To: discussion@acfug.org> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
>> Which would lead you to lock it..
> These are best practices I learned years ago with Hal Helms but it> has been> a while and could be a little fuzzy in my head ...>> Dusty
>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dean H.> Saxe> Sent: Sunday, July 23
a little fuzzy in my head ...
Dusty
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean H.
Saxe
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:58 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
Which would lead you to lock it... the REQUEST sc
Helms but it has been
a while and could be a little fuzzy in my head ...
Dusty
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean H. Saxe
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:58 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
Which
Saxe
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 5:57 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
IFRAME is a client-side issue that has nothing to do with the
processing scope on the server. CF has no concept of an IFRAME, its
just another http request.
Dusty, make sure you
006 4:45 PM> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue>>>> Dusty,> IFrames are buggy to begin with. In the past to overcome this, I> used a more persistent scope like CLIENT or SESSION scope to
> persist into the IFRAME.>> I remembe
in
the frame is also in the webroot. Strang one ... ???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 2:28 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
Is the page that is in the f
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Teddy
Payne
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 4:45 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
Dusty,
IFrames are buggy to begin with. In the past to overcome this, I
used a more persistent scope like CLIENT
@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss]
interesting issue
Dusty,
IFrames are buggy to begin with. In the past to overcome this, I used a
more persistent scope like CLIENT or SESSION scope to persist into the
IFRAME.
I remember something to the effect that the loading page will get the request
TECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John MasonSent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 2:28 PMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
Is the page that is in the frame on the same directory or sub directory ofthe application.cfm? Do you have any other application
: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
Is the page that is in the frame on the same directory or sub directory of
the application.cfm? Do you have any other application.cfm's floating
around?
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
unday, July 23, 2006 12:33 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] interesting issue
I ran into something interesting and wondered if anyone had any insight on
it. I have noticed that variables set in application.cfm, in this case in
the request scope, do not work when pages are in an i
I ran into something interesting and wondered if anyone had any insight on
it. I have noticed that variables set in application.cfm, in this case in
the request scope, do not work when pages are in an iFrame.
For example (request variables are set in application.cfm):
SELECT
*
FROM
22 matches
Mail list logo
