On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Muhammad Panji wrote:
> Dear All,
> Anyone has experience installing and using pfsens from a flash drive / thumb
> drive? how is the performance comparing to using hard drive? Thank you
> regards,
For the most part there is no difference in performance. The
fire
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> I have a hunch IPv6 deployment will pick up considerably
> 1-2 years from now.
>
> - Forwarded message from Scott Howard -
>
> From: Scott Howard
> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:35:57 -0800
> To: na...@nanog.org
> Subject: And so it ends.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
>
> Thank you.
> It's good to know that.
> But is there is some prognosis on the 2.0 release date?
Yep, when it's done.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:07 AM, William David Armstrong
wrote:
>
> I can help for translate in Brazilian Portuguese
http://pootle.pfsense.org.br:8080/docs/resources.html
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Leo Bicknell -
>
> From: Leo Bicknell
> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:24:16 -0800
> To: na...@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: ARIN space not accepted
> Organization: United Federation of Planets
>
> In a message written on
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
[snip]
> But still - no IPv6 support (though a 3rd-party patch is now available to
> beat it in, it's not up to par yet, and it's not in 'stable'). :(
The work Seth is doing will be in 2.1 sometime next year. He has made
a lot of progres
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> It works, but performance is, in my experience, poor. Don't use trunking
> (802.3ad / LACP) and VLANs together, or inter-vlan routing slows down
> drastically. This appears to be a VMWare problem, not a pfSense problem.
> I recommend creatin
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Is boot from zfs root an install option?
>
No, the installer does not have ZFS support and we will not see ZFS support
into 2.1 at the earliest when work on the new installer picks up steam.
Scott
On Wednesday, July 28, 2010, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/announce.html is out. Will
> pfSense 2.0 get this?
We already have FreeBSD 8.1 on 2.0 snapshots.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussio
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Zied Fakhfakh wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 05:07 PM, Zied Fakhfakh wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm planning to port/build pfsense on freescale 8349e powerpc based
>> system.
>> http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=MPC8349E
>> It holds the e300 power
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> freebsd on that ship is already ported, any "good luck" ? or "forget it" :)
>>
>>
Oops, pressed send too soon. I am unsure of this boards FreeBSD status but
to get to the 300+ hour mark that assumes that
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Zied Fakhfakh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to port/build pfsense on freescale 8349e powerpc based system.
> http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=MPC8349E
> It holds the e300 powerPC processor.
>
> Nice board
am I getting into a very lar
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mark Crane wrote:
> Look at the specs. ALIX could really use an updated CPU like the Intel atom
> or a VIA CPU.
>
> GuruPlug :
> Power consumption 5watts of power.
> CPU is over 1.2ghz
> 512mb o16bit DDR2 800MHz
> esata support
> 2x Gb Ethernet
> 2x USB 2.0
> 1x M
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Paul Mansfield
wrote:
> I asked them if there was a UK distributor, and they responded promptly
> with
> http://www.newit.co.uk/shop/products.php?cat=11
>
> dual ethernet for less than £100 (US$150) seems quite a good deal.
>
For about the same price why not purch
http://live.twit.tv
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: discussion-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:13 PM, cl...@pfsense
wrote:
> Can't wait for the electronic version :-)
I believe only commercial support customers will have access to the
electronic version.
And folks, please respect the authors and do not pirate it. kthanks
Scott
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> Anyone has a working IPsec config with a virtual OPT device (VIP or similar)
> you could share?
>
> I've made a tunnel (one end is transparent bridge, terminated on
> WAN), but can't route between networks. I'll move on to OpenVPN
> (UDP port
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> I thought you corrected .php to exclude Gateway input field. So I just
> modify config.xml and never go to gui to modify WAN interface, right?
Yep, that boxes WAN IP never changes.
Scott
-
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Thank you. Do you have xml for 1.2.3-RC3 so I could try it?
> Evgeny.
em1
100
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> sorry if this topic was brought up before but...
> I am running several pfSense-BGP installations but they are all for
> redundancy purposes over several links.
>
> Does anybody run pfSense with BGP and two Internet providers?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Marty Nelson wrote:
> Hey everyone. I’m running 1.2.1 and was wondering if there was a change log
> available? I poked around the pfSense site as well as the forums and I
> either blindly missed it, or it’s not obvious. J
Please see http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=4
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Paul Mansfield
wrote:
> http://www.openvpn.net/index.php/open-source/downloads.html
>
> just thought people might want to upgrade, the RCs have been good for me,
> especially for vista users where you don't have to do the external "route"
> stuff.
>
> perhaps openvp
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote:
> I have tried dual wan and dual machine setup with no success. Dual wan
> pfsense only works with single machine. carp also works, but both carp
> *and* dual wan together does not work!
> And seems there are very few who care about pfsense failove
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Augusto Ferronato
wrote:
> Using Nagios :) heheheh!!!
Bixdata and http://mon.itor.us are small pieces to my monitoring puzzles.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discussion-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
We do not handle 2.0 issues here, this is for our stable releases.
Please visit the testing area on the forum for 2.0.
Scott
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Nelson Murilo wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I checked that subject in list before, but I don't found nada.
>
> So, I'm testing pfsense mainly
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Joe Lagreca wrote:
> Would it be possible to add more entries for DNS servers in the
> General Setup section? 3-4 would be great. I know its possible to
> edit the config file to add more, I just think it would be usefull to
> have it in the GUI as well. Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:15 PM, pfsense sense wrote:
> i'm not suggesting pfsense be run inside a VM, i am suggesting pfsense
> provide VM functionality
> i'm fully aware the VM's shortcomings, i manage a 14TB ESX cluster
> let me say that again...
>
> i am suggesting pfsense provide VM func
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:23 PM, jason whitt wrote:
> i was going through my config file the other day and noticed that when using
> pptp against local users the users passwords are stored in clear text in the
> config file.
> Is it possible to encrypt them?
Not currently. See the list history
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FYI: http://www.heise.de/netze/pfSense-als-VDSL-Router--/artikel/116739
>
>
> (Notice that IP-TV needs IGMP support which is apparently not
> in pfSense kernel? Here's a thread, which says the problem
> is an IGMP proxy h
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Tommy Skoglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could some admin/postmaster please disable the email address so the
> spamming wil stop?
>
Yes, sorry about that.
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] removed from mailing list
discussion@pfsense.com
Sorry about the noise folks!
Scott
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:07 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have received your email and someone will be responding shortly.
>
>Please do not respond to this email -- it is automatical
[EMAIL PROTECTED] removed from mailing list
discussion@pfsense.com
Sorry about the noise folks!
Scott
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:45 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have received your email and someone will be responding shortly.
>
>Please do not respond to this email -- it is automatica
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.provos.org/index.php?/pages/dnstest.html
>
> DNS Resolver Test
>
> For secure name resolution, it is important that your DNS resolver uses
> random source ports. The box below will tell you if there is something
1.3-ALPHA-ALPHA testing snapshots are now available. Please see
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=208 for more information.
Scott
Please see http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=207 for more information.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Andrew Burnette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had similar thoughts a while back. doesn't always work out the way you
> think. (e.g. toyota prius, while a politically and technologically needed
> car, actually saves no energy over it's lifespan due to the enormous a
On 4/14/08, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if clog is turned off, does it then use "tail -N" and look at a normal
> log file instead of using clog to view?
Yes, it omits the clog binary completely.
Scott
On 4/14/08, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have commited some code to help with this:
>
> http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/usr/local/www/guiconfig.inc?rev=1.90.2.50;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup
Woops, wrong URL:
http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi
On 4/14/08, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RB wrote:
> > I've had a request to increase logging duration on systems that have
> > no access to an external syslog server, so am making the necessary
> > changes to maintain much larger ring-log files. Incredibly larger -
>
>
> what we've done
On 3/28/08, Dennis Karlssson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Scott
>
> I use both CP and FW schedules.
I have a feeling that you are just working around the problem and not
solving it.
>From a shell do this:
sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets
How many buckets are defined by default? 256?
Take
On 3/28/08, Dennis Karlssson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bill
>
> Deactivating and activating the Traffic Shaper did the job.
I am not quite understanding this. Are you using captive portal? Or
schedule firewall rules?
Mar 27 23:22:49 kernel: ipfw: install_state: Too many dynamic rules
On 3/22/08, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For that matter, is any non-dev actually _running_ 1.3? For quite
> some time, short of building the whole system myself, performing an
> update to a fresh test system just results in complete b0rkage
> (libraries missing & whatnot), same as HEAD has
On 3/18/08, Cristiano Deana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pfsense 1.2, I installed hte package of bandwitdhd. If I access to
> https://my.pfsense/bandwithd/ there is no request for password
> Do you thing is it right?
That is correct. Firewall off the port to only trusted hosts.
Scott
Thanks everyone (20+) of you for notifying us of the mirror problems.
It is now resolved.
Scott
On 3/13/08, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I was looking for the syslog-ng package to install on my pfsense boxes,
> and discovered that the main freebsd site no longer has the ports for
> that release - only 6.3.
>
> I found the ftp.de.freebsd.org site still had it, so I did an evil
On 2/13/08, Ben Timby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott, sorry to bug you, but I wondered if you ever had a chance to
> check out this patch and what the outcome was?
It looks like this has been committed. At last the patches here are
showing as already applied. Can you verify this?
Scott
On Feb 11, 2008 1:13 PM, Ronald L. Rosson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On doing an update from RC4 - RC5 with Dashboard installed I can no
> longer get dashboard back. Even tried uninstalling dashboard (Yes, I
> know it says it can not be uninstalled) to no avail. Other than that
> and the bug
On Feb 11, 2008 9:15 AM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'll probably skip RC5 as an official release even though the snapshots
> are labeled as such right now.
Yeah. no plans to release 1.2-RC5 except in its current snapshot form.
I changed the version so we can identify new issues
On 2/10/08, Jan Hoevers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tested this now on a fresh install, and you're right, it will work
> on existing installs.
> The missing od issue is of course still there, but unlike I wrote in my
> original mail, it does not cause the script to abort.
>
> Thanks for fixin
On 2/3/08, Jan Hoevers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running the embedded version of pfSense on a Soekris 4801.
> Today (3 Feb 2008) I upgraded to 1.2-RC4 and it caught my eye that the
> bogons file (/etc/bogons) dated back to October 2007.
>
> I consider bogons filtering important, so I decided
On 1/23/08, Fabio C Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And how can I find out if 1.2-RC4 uses that freebsd fix?
http://pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/patches/RELENG_6_2/if_lagg.diff
... Is what we use. Feel free to send a new patch if it does not
include the needed bits.
Scott
I bet it is being caused by your usage of LAGG. Unfortunately you are
on your own on this one as LAGG is not supported as of yet.
On Jan 22, 2008 2:03 PM, Fabio C Flores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # ping 10.0.2.10
> PING 10.0.2.10 (10.0.2.10): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 10.0.2.10: icmp_seq=0
All,
We have opened a new FreeNode pfSense chat room that is meant for off topic
discussions for like minded people (pfSensers).
Please join us and chat with like minded folks!
#pfSenseCHAT on FreeNode.
Scott
On 1/2/08, patrickm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm in charge of replacing our Cisco PIX firewall with one that will allow
> us to use VPN, and a bunch of my other sysadmin friends have suggested
> using pfsense. Everything was super easy to set up initially, and now I
> want to get o
On Jan 2, 2008 6:10 PM, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> In the current beta of m0n0wall they've included the possibility to use
> a host name as destination gateway address. Will this be included in the
> 1.2 release?
No. 1.2 is frozen.
It is already in RELENG_1 and HEAD so s
On 12/5/07, Jose Augusto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
> I need help.
> I have a firewall running on Linux, and the most faster possible the change
> the firewall for PFSense, but, in pfsense is possible authentication on NTML
> (Active Di
On 12/5/07, Ben Timby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have attached two patches.
>
> dyndns-HEAD.patch
> dyndns-RELENG_1.patch
>
> both patch two files:
>
> usr/local/www/services_dyndns.php
> etc/inc/services.inc
Thanks! I will check into these this evening.
Scott
On 11/27/07, Ben Timby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I set up the Dynamic DNS feature today, however, I needed to be able
> to specify my DNS server address.
>
> The attached patch adds a field to the services_dyndns.php form.
> This field if provided will be written to the nscommands file (in
> ser
On Nov 19, 2007 1:50 PM, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Assuming I ftp at home (don't recall the last time I intentionally did
> that!) then ftp works just fine via the primary wan as Chris mentions.
> I think I did have to create a rule for traffic destined to 127.0.0.1
> to use the
On Nov 14, 2007 5:46 PM, D.Pageau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the current status on multi-wan ftp proxying ?
>
> I have dig around on pfsense FAQ, forum, blog, wiki, ticket (btw, is it
> too many source of information ?)
>
> Some info (outdated ?) on FAQ (or is it blog or forum or wiki or
You most likely have a port range defined.
Scott
On Nov 9, 2007 2:26 AM, Tortise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Team
>
> I added a rule for MS TS access to 3389, I get logged "php: : Not installing
> nat reflection rules for a port range > 500" and the connection does not
> seem to be created.
On 9/5/07, Nick Buraglio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What wireless AP are you using?
>
> nb
I answered him here:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,5999.msg35459.html#msg35459
Tunge2, please stop cross posting between the forum and the mailing list.
Scott
No. Nothing will change from this perspective. Please visit our blog
where we describe how this wilkl help the project.
Scott
On 8/25/07, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the recent move to paid support for pfsense and monowall, will this
> signify the end of the firmware upgrades, packa
On mar, 21 aoû 2007 17:48:24 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just one question, from a pfsense newbie
>
> where i can download 1.2RC2 update ?
>
> Best regards
http://www.pfsense.com/mirror.php?section=updates/pfSense-Full-And-Embedded-Update-1.2-RC2.tgz
Scott
On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of the steps should be the same for NetBSD as they are for FreeBSD since
> they share a lot of commonalities.
Not quite. You will find a lot of items that rely on netgraph such as
PPTP, PPPoE, etc.
Scott
On 7/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> This looks like a job for NetBSD!
Good luck porting pfSense to Net! :)
Scott
Dashboard is still very much a work in progress and has a few issues.
Scott
On 7/17/07, Daniele Guazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Small correction: only dashboard stalls
Daniele Guazzoni wrote:
> I'm running 1.2-BETA-2-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-07-05-2007 and it stalls on
> adding and removing packa
On 7/3/07, Chris Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use the "load balancer pool edit" page quite a lot, adding and
removing servers from my active pool. It gets kind of old typing the
IPs when re-adding servers, and I understand it needs a little
refinement anyway, so I propose some changes (wh
On 6/21/07, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/20/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nfe won't be there in 1.3, correct? I can survive with
> just two interfaces (WAN and LAN) for a while, but I do need
> at least DMZ rather soon. When they say I should stay
> away from http
Try a recent snapshot.
On 6/20/07, Fabian Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
We are using PfSense 1.2_BETA and are experiencing some serious problems
concerning DynDNS updates. Sometimes they are performed (obviously without
adding additional options, e.g. wildcard=ON) and sometimes they
On 6/15/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's no SATA soft-RAID support planned in the pfsense install, right?
RAID 1 is supported if two disks are present.
In the meantime if you have a chance do a netio or netperf test on
1.0.1 and then compare to a recent snapshot. I would be interested
in hearing performance improvements on modern hardware as we have
mainly tested 266mhz devices over the weekend.
Scott
On 6/4/07, Greg Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECT
One of the 10% patches have already been ported and in our tree. We
are seeing up to a 33% improvement in performance on some machines
such as Soekris 266. Stay tuned, Chris plans on blogging about the
improvements soon.
Scott
On 6/4/07, Jure Pečar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just saw this
On 4/25/07, DarkFoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm considering installing the UPnP daemon on some home/home office boxes,
and I'm curious what the security issues are.
From my own (simple) analysis, the worst that could happen is a malicious
application could ask for many, many (almost all?) o
RELENG_1 and -HEAD would be fine.
We are past RELENG_1_2 deadline.
Scott
On 4/22/07, Kyle Mott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you care if the diff's/patches are from a February 1.0.1 snapshot, or
would you prefer it from a 1.2-BETA snapshot?
-Kyle
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On
On 4/15/07, Kyle Mott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a deadline for submitting a patch to be included in the base
release? I'm still working on my EtherChannel port, but I've still got a
few things to work out. Will I still be able to get it in to the next
release (I assume 1.2), and/or 1.0.
On 4/10/07, Daniele Guazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I upgraded to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-03-27-2007, running with the snort package
installed.
Before the upgrade everything was ok, now I have 16 instances of snort running
and crashing regularly.
Known problem ?
Yes.
Uninstall and reinstall the
On 3/30/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I really like about pfsense/m0n0 is that it allows you
to build IPsec tunnels between firewalls. This is rather important,
because I happen to live in a country where ISPs are required to
spy on their customers by law (storing all connectio
"snort blocked" the PHP process is getting all CPU.
Memory and disk are ok, swap is not used.
There s something with the snort package which is not ok.
Daniele
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> No, this is not a known problem. You might try upgrading to the
> recent snapshot:
> htt
Technically now that the images are 128 megabytes its possible. We
just never spent the time to make it work correctly.
On 3/22/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:20:12PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> >Is there a way to upgrade 1.0.1 embed
On 3/22/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:56:04AM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> No, this is not a known problem. You might try upgrading to the
> recent snapshot:
> http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/updates/
Is there a way t
No, this is not a known problem. You might try upgrading to the
recent snapshot:
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/updates/
Scott
On 3/22/07, Daniele Guazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fellows
I have pfSense 1.0.1 installed on a VIA mini-ITX which regularly hangs.
The behaviou
On 3/11/07, Kyle Mott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm having a hard time deciding whether or not to use a package or just
modify the base system and provide diff's. Where should I send what I've
got thus far so I can get some opinions on what I should do (package vs
base)?
This feels more like a
On 2/28/07, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I "hacked" a quick mod for mpd/pppoe server to allow me to use pfsense
as an access concentrator for dial-up users (via ethernet).
Pfsense was perfectly capable of allowing access via pppoe / radius but
was missing a way for the radius server to c
On 2/28/07, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Working on mpd, I saw that there's a pfSense ports directory in
/home/pfsense/tools
I need to port some custom packages to pfSense, so how do I tell the
build scripts to use my own port instead of the freebsd ones, or shall I
just copy them to /usr/por
On 2/28/07, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote:
> Comment out the call to update_cvs_depot? Or update that routine to
> better handle a development model that has no CVS access?
Modifying the function to handle SKIP_CHECKOUT (which is documented in
in the wiki) is trivial, as i
Sorry but we do not give out firm dates. When it is done is the answer.
Either way folks can upgrade to the latest version which features
FreeBSD 6.2 from
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/updates/ so its a moot
point.
Scott
On 2/23/07, Dmitry Sorokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is up and running just fine?!
Scott
On 2/19/07, Simon Cornelius P. Umacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Everything was fine a few hours ago. cvs.pfsense.com seems to be
offline now. :)
Florent Parent wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My goal is to create a development environment in VMware. I want to do
On 2/15/07, Salcido, Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I were to install PFSense on my Nokia P020 "m0n0wall currently installed"
could I use my existing config.xml with PFSense?
Please see
http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=4&id=89&artlang=en&highlight=m0n0wall%20config
On 2/14/07, Chris Godwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm getting a sync error. Both boxes are running 1.0.1 on a hacomm i386
box.
I have added additional code to the XMLRPC sync area to hopefully tell
us what is going on. Upgrade to a new snapshot an hour from now
(around 9pm EST).
http://sna
On 2/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip - html stuff snipped]
Guys,
been using pfsense for a while now, and love it.
previously I used lots of openvpn - but with using pfsense and WRAP boxes, and
CARP failover - I've moved to IPsec for a few reasons:
- openvpn under pfse
On 1/18/07, Cristian Mata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thks Scoot, wich is the name of the rules file? Because en my freebsd y have
pf.conf but in pfsense... the rules are in the xml file?
Thanks in advance.
Look at /tmp/rules.debug
Scott
No, this unfortunately will not work like this is outlined PF and IPF
are a little too different. But you can use one of our anchors in the
rules file to insert and remove rules from cron easier than IPF.
On 1/18/07, Sjaak Nabuurs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cristian
Maybe this is a sugestion
Nobody is working on it to my knowledge.
Scott
On 1/16/07, Adam Van Ornum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone working on source based redirection? I checked in the forums and
one guy had been working on it supposedly but apparently he disappeared.
Its a feature I need and I might try doing
No, you do not want source port, you want destination port.
On 1/8/07, Carlos Julio Sánchez [ACC-SIS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, i send the screen shots with the port 1720 of netmeeting
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 08
You need to define the port in question as well.
Scott
On 1/8/07, Carlos Julio Sánchez [ACC-SIS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here I send the screenshots, please inform me if I have configured anything
wrong
Thansks!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
but my netmeeting machine behind
Pfsense don't have video and sound yet.
I was reading the forum but said the same below
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:19 PM
To: discussion@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense
Same situation that VOIP folks run into. Create an advanced outbound
NAT rule for this particular port, move it to the top and be sure to
enable the static pot option for the rule in question.
Also search the forum for static port, it's discussed about once a
week at least.
Scott
On 1/8/07, C
FreeBSD will buffer as much ram as you give it IIRC. What you really
should monitor is top from a shell if you are this worried. I would
not be worried at all until memory is in the 90+.
Scott
On 12/28/06, Jack Mayhew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm seeing the same thing (ver 1.0.1 - though
On 12/15/06, Odette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI, I've successfully substituted Linux-iptables with PFsense on Soekris
net4801 using 5 eth ports and everything have been running fine for more than
30 days.
About the rule translation nightmare: aliases and rules optimization permitted
me to con
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
