RE: [pfSense-discussion] IPsec tunnel to a transparent bridge

2008-10-05 Thread Greg Hennessy
. -Original Message- From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 October 2008 10:32 To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense-discussion] IPsec tunnel to a transparent bridge Almost a year ago, Chris Buechler told me http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion@pfsense.com/msg02426

[pfSense-discussion] IPsec tunnel to a transparent bridge

2008-10-05 Thread Eugen Leitl
Almost a year ago, Chris Buechler told me http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion@pfsense.com/msg02426.html In a transparent bridge setup, the gateway of the hosts on the bridge isn't going to be pfsense, it'll be something on the outside interface. If you have a routed subnet setup on an

[pfSense-discussion] IPsec tunnel to a transparent bridge

2007-11-06 Thread Eugen Leitl
I used to have a nice pre-shared key IPsec tunnel between two m0n0walls/pfSenses, running in NAT. Worked very nicely. However, I now have a transparent bridge with a public /24 network, and whenever I activate the tunnel I no longer can ping any host on the network (the firewall included) from

Re: [pfSense-discussion] IPsec tunnel to a transparent bridge

2007-11-06 Thread Chris Buechler
Eugen Leitl wrote: I used to have a nice pre-shared key IPsec tunnel between two m0n0walls/pfSenses, running in NAT. Worked very nicely. However, I now have a transparent bridge with a public /24 network, and whenever I activate the tunnel I no longer can ping any host on the network (the

Re: [pfSense-discussion] IPsec tunnel to a transparent bridge

2007-11-06 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:59:25AM -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: In a transparent bridge setup, the gateway of the hosts on the bridge isn't going to be pfsense, it'll be something on the outside interface. If you have a routed subnet setup on an OPT interface this will work fine. Alas, the