On 5 December 2013 17:35, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
Namespace packages have been tried with scikits - there's a reason why
scikit-learn and statsmodels spent a lot of effort dropping them. They don't
work. Scipy, while monolithic, works for users.
The namespace package
On 5 December 2013 19:40, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 December 2013 23:31, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, rather than adding complexity most folks don't need directly to the
base wheel spec, here's a possible multiwheel notion - embed multiple
wheels with different
On 4 December 2013 23:25, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
== Regarding custom installation directories ==
This technically came up in the cobblerd thread (regarding installing
scripts to /usr/sbin instead of
On 5 December 2013 09:52, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how this would work - wheels don't seem to me to be
appropriate for installing external dependencies, but as I'm not
100% clear on what you mean by that term I may be misunderstanding.
Can you provide a concrete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just publishing a new release of Berkeley DB I got 'Programming
Language :: Python :: 3.4' selector is rejected as invalid.
- --
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/
j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/
On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:40 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how this would work - wheels don't seem to me to be
appropriate for installing external dependencies, but as I'm not
100% clear on what you mean by that term
One of the key features of conda is that it is not
On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote
I'm just wondering how much we are making this hard for very little return.
I also don't know.
I wonder if a poll on the relevant lists would be helpful...
I'll start playing with wheels in the near future.
Great!
On Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:33:22 PM Michael Jansen wrote:
Changes to distutils itself are fairly pointless, since the earliest
possible date for publication of any such changes is now as part of
Python 3.5 in 2015. The sheer impracticality of that approach when
plenty of people are
Installing large package such as Django on EC2 micro instance took a
very long time, 8-9 minutes with 99% cpu usage. Initially, I taught it
caused by setuptools analyzing the packages to figure out it zip_safe
or not [1]. But after looking at this closely, that's not the case.
Analyzing the egg
On 4 December 2013 20:56, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
So a lowest common denominator wheel would be very, very, useful.
As for what that would be: the superpack is great, but it's been
On 5 December 2013 00:06, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
but Anoconda does some a nifty thing: it make s conda package that holds
the shared lib, then other packages that depend on it depend on that
package, so it will both get auto--installed
But I don't see why you couldn't do that
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Oscar Benjamin
oscar.j.benja...@gmail.comwrote:
On 4 December 2013 20:56, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
So a lowest common denominator wheel would be
On 5 December 2013 23:22, Jesus Cea j...@jcea.es wrote:
Programming Language :: Python :: 3.4
Added!
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Oscar Benjamin oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I wouldn't want that kind of bad PR getting around about
scientific Python Python is slower than Matlab etc.
Well, is that better or worse that 2% or less people finding they
can't run it on their old
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov
wrote:
What would really be best is run-time selection of the appropriate lib
-- it would solve this problem, and allow users to re-distribute
working binaries via py2exe, etc. And not require opening a security
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
What would really be best is run-time selection of the appropriate lib
-- it would solve this problem, and allow users to
On 6 December 2013 11:52, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
What would really be best is run-time selection of the appropriate lib
-- it would solve this problem, and allow users to re-distribute
Am 06.12.2013 06:47, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On 6 December 2013 11:52, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal chris.bar...@noaa.gov
wrote:
What would really be best is run-time selection of the appropriate lib
-- it would solve this
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 December 2013 11:52, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
What would really be best is run-time selection of the appropriate
19 matches
Mail list logo
