>
> PPUG. Also by the way, is that the right acronym for quick reference? :)
>
I guess so, or maybe "PUG". It's not pretty though.
(btw, HHGTP was the acronym for the older "Hitchhiker's Guide to Packaging")
> which information will
> be off-loaded to the documentation for the other projects
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On 15 Jan 2014 17:15, "Marcus Smith" wrote:
>>
>> Fyi, the "Python Packaging User Guide" has moved from bitbucket to github.
>>
>> The new project home is here:
>> https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide
>> and the built site is
>
>
> > As stated in the README, "The guide is part of a larger effort to
> improve all of the packaging and installation docs, including pip,
> setuptools, virtualenv, and wheel. Ultimately, users need more than a
> "guide" to feel confident about the current tools. They need complete,
> accurate
On 16 Jan 2014 10:03, "Marcus Smith" wrote:
>>
>>
>> My apologies. I misread N[.N]+ as the '+' meaning "one or more" (as in
>
>
> maybe N[(.N)+] would be clearer.
>
> all of (.N)+ is optional
> but when it's present it can be .N or .N.N or .N.N.N etc...
Yeah, that's a good idea. Simply switchi
>
>
> My apologies. I misread N[.N]+ as the '+' meaning "one or more" (as in
>
maybe N[(.N)+] would be clearer.
all of (.N)+ is optional
but when it's present it can be .N or .N.N or .N.N.N etc...
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.o
> My apologies. I misread N[.N]+ as the '+' meaning "one or more" (as in
> regular expressions). Marcus pointed my mistake out to me.
It reads the same way to me - I would expect N[.N]* to indicate that a single
numeric component is valid. Still, as long as the regex is right ... distlib
has add
On 15 January 2014 23:13, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2014 02:24, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>>
>> Metadata 2.0 doesn't support versions that are a single number.
>
> Yes it does - that was one of the compatibility changes I made quite some
> time ago. It's also listed as one of the differences rela
On 16 Jan 2014 05:30, "Vinay Sajip" wrote:
>
> > fair question. partly due to personal comfort level with git/github,
but also was
> > hoping we'd get more involvement using github, since it's more popular.
>
> Your choice, of course, and I understand about the personal preference
part. I do
> won
On 16 Jan 2014 02:24, "Paul Moore" wrote:
>
> Metadata 2.0 doesn't support versions that are a single number.
Yes it does - that was one of the compatibility changes I made quite some
time ago. It's also listed as one of the differences relative to PEP 346.
The only things preventing me from acc
It's not just part of a joint PSU / PYPA plan to go "full Rackspace"? :-)
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
>>> fair question. partly due to personal comfort level with git/github, but
>>> also was
>>> hoping we'd get mor
On Jan 15, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>> fair question. partly due to personal comfort level with git/github, but
>> also was
>> hoping we'd get more involvement using github, since it's more popular.
>
> Your choice, of course, and I understand about the personal preference part.
>
> fair question. partly due to personal comfort level with git/github, but also
> was
> hoping we'd get more involvement using github, since it's more popular.
Your choice, of course, and I understand about the personal preference part. I
do
wonder how much involvement you will get from people
fair question. partly due to personal comfort level with git/github, but
also was hoping we'd get more involvement using github, since it's more
popular.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Marcus Smith wrote:
> > Fyi, the "Python Pa
Metadata 2.0 doesn't support versions that are a single number. This
has recently been flagged as a pip issue
(https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/1445) because pip won't handle
wheels with a single-component version.
We can obviously accept the patch for pip as a backward-compatibility
measure, but
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Marcus Smith wrote:
> Fyi, the "Python Packaging User Guide" has moved from bitbucket to github.
Why the move?
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-si
On 15 Jan 2014 17:15, "Marcus Smith" wrote:
>
> Fyi, the "Python Packaging User Guide" has moved from bitbucket to github.
>
> The new project home is here:
https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide
> and the built site is still here:
https://python-packaging-user-guide.readthedocs.org/e
16 matches
Mail list logo
