Re: [Distutils] Name arbitration on PyPI - how about administrative abandonment/replacement meta-data

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/20/2016 04:36 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote: > its not given lightly, and it shouldn't be easy to weasel out of it. > Actually a noop release is a good indicator that the mark is > well-deserved and should be keept. Making an effort to remove a

Re: [Distutils] Name arbitration on PyPI - how about administrative abandonment/replacement meta-data

Am 20.04.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Chris Barker: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Ronny Pfannschmidt > > wrote: > > Instead of overtaking, > how about clearly marking packages as abandoned/maintained clearly > pointing out the mark was imposed by

Re: [Distutils] Name arbitration on PyPI - how about administrative abandonment/replacement meta-data

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Ronny Pfannschmidt < opensou...@ronnypfannschmidt.de> wrote: > Instead of overtaking, > how about clearly marking packages as abandoned/maintained clearly > pointing out the mark was imposed by community action > I think that would be a good idea -- and maybe star

Re: [Distutils] Name arbitration on PyPI - how about administrative abandonment/replacement meta-data

Instead of overtaking, how about clearly marking packages as abandoned/maintained clearly pointing out the mark was imposed by community action and listing potential/primary replacements this would have the possibility of also supporting normal abandonment when people voluntary stop maintenance a