2009/10/10 John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com:
Not to slash turpentine on an already painted bikeshed, but since the
project's aim is to be a module distribution manager for Python, I
like the name modisty (*mod*ule *dist*ribution manager for
P*y*thon).
Ick. But mopy- is actually a good prefix.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Sorry I won't run a new poll again, Distribute is the name.
Besides, it's already on page #1 on google when I type 'python
disribute' or 'distribute python'
*shrugs*
I will state now that I
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
1- we ship 0.7 under a new name - e.g. like distribute2
You could even take the opportunity to rename it completely to something
that makes sense ;-)
To re-iterate my argument: Distribute doesn't distribute anything. If
anything was to be called Distribute, it'd be the
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
1- we ship 0.7 under a new name - e.g. like distribute2
You could even take the opportunity to rename it completely to something
that makes sense ;-)
To re-iterate my argument: Distribute doesn't
Chris Withers kirjoitti:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
1- we ship 0.7 under a new name - e.g. like distribute2
You could even take the opportunity to rename it completely to
something that makes sense ;-)
While I agree that the name was badly chosen (for reasons you outline
below), a name change at
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Sorry I won't run a new poll again, Distribute is the name.
Besides, it's already on page #1 on google when I type 'python
disribute' or 'distribute python'
*shrugs*
I will state now that I will fight tooth and nail before anything called
distribute gets into the stdlib
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Sorry I won't run a new poll again, Distribute is the name.
Besides, it's already on page #1 on google when I type 'python
disribute' or 'distribute python'
*shrugs*
I will state now that I
2009-10-09 00:27:41 Tarek Ziadé napisał(a):
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:07:13PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis wrote:
2009-10-04 23:52:25 Sridhar Ratnakumar napisał(a):
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:41:06
2009-10-04 23:52:25 Sridhar Ratnakumar napisał(a):
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:41:06 -0700, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
The other way would be to use Distribute instead of Setuptools for
what the packaging system is calling setuptools. That's pretty
much what is happening in
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:07:13PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2009-10-04 23:52:25 Sridhar Ratnakumar napisał(a):
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:41:06 -0700, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
The other way would be to use Distribute instead of Setuptools for
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:07:13PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2009-10-04 23:52:25 Sridhar Ratnakumar napisał(a):
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:41:06 -0700, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
We are not sure yet, but when 0.7 will be ready we have two choices:
1- we ship 0.7 under a new name - e.g. like distribute2
2- we ship a fat 0.7 with the old 0.6 packages and modules included.
I think 1- is better,
Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote:
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:41:06 -0700, Tarek Ziadé
ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
The other way would be to use Distribute instead of Setuptools for
what the packaging system is calling setuptools. That's pretty
much what is happening in Gentoo (arch) and UHU-Linux (dev),
Hi,
I'm planning to make a port for Distribute to make it more accessible to users.
However, thinking about up coming 0.7 release, which will break the
compatibility
with setuptools, I started wondering it's not so easy to make a
package for distribute.
If I understand correctly, Distutils 0.7
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Akira Kitada akit...@macports.org wrote:
I'm planning to make a port for Distribute to make it more accessible to
users.
That's very much appreciated :)
For Distribute, there would be a few options to work around this:
1) Make 0.6 and 0.7 different package,
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
For Distribute, there would be a few options to work around this:
1) Make 0.6 and 0.7 different package, like Distribute and Distribute2
(Jinja like solution)
2) Make 0.7 fat package, which includes 0.6(setuptools
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:41:06 -0700, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
The other way would be to use Distribute instead of Setuptools for
what the packaging system is calling setuptools. That's pretty
much what is happening in Gentoo (arch) and UHU-Linux (dev),
right now
Interesting.
Sridhar Ratnakumar a écrit :
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:41:06 -0700, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
The other way would be to use Distribute instead of Setuptools for
what the packaging system is calling setuptools. That's pretty
much what is happening in Gentoo (arch) and UHU-Linux
18 matches
Mail list logo
