James Bennett wrote:
> On 8/26/06, Bjørn Stabell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, a lot of things would be better handled at the database level,
>> e.g., inheritance, views, more advanced validation, but it would break
>> database independence.
>
What would be really useful for django is:
1.
Someone in IRC tonight was running into the problem described in
ticket #343 tonight, and after a quick test I can verify it's still
happening in trunk. I'm blacklisted in Trac right now (Tom's looking
into it), so I'll post some thoughts here.
The root of the problem is that OneToOneField inheri
On 8/26/06, Bjørn Stabell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, a lot of things would be better handled at the database level,
> e.g., inheritance, views, more advanced validation, but it would break
> database independence.
Inheritance makes sense in the ORM, because we want to be able to map
inheri
James Bennett wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Karl Guertin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/adv_datamapping.myt
>
> Some of these examples deal with rather exotic use cases that, I
> think, are close to the edge of what ORM can reasonably do before the
> abstraction starts leakin
Felix Ingram wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd like an integer field larger than postgresql's integer (2^31).
> >
> > Any interest in a patch for BigIntegerField?
>
> Matt Croydon submitted a patch a while ago:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/399
>
> I
Hi Adrian,
I was not really using get_template_sources directly but it was used in
some of the code I was debugging (o;
Thanks for the fix,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developer
I´ve looked into some Oasis-specs (UBL) a while ago, and while i can
see some sense in applying detailed standards in specific
B2B-procurement areas, I´m more skeptical, whether these complex
approaches will really scale beyond those markets.
Adam Bosworth, VP, Engineering at Google stated in his
Apparently in the current trunk reversed urllookup is sort of working.
After toying with it a little bit I found an issue:
The main method, reverse, only returns the resulting matched url. Not
the rule (the regex and extra arguments) it matched. There is no
reliable way of knowing which (kw)args
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can't see any reason why you cant use an object database in Django,
> its just that the admin interface to it won't work like the current
> admin interface.
As you can read in the down link I am trying to implementig the free
specifications of OASIS (xNAL, xPIL).
The
> That's cool -- mind posting your code somewhere?
http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/urlrelay/
CheeseShop and setuptools makes installation of even my trivial modules
on my webhost and other places I need it convienient.
>> 1) Develop a loosely coupled module that acts like the "usual" Python
>
GinTon wrote:
> I think that would be a big step if we could implement a NXD in Django,
> but I don't speak of substitute a RDBMS by NXD else of using NXD when
> it was really necessary.
I think you'd first have to go 'up' a layer, and define an API onto
semi-structured data, and then you coul
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/10/24/follow-yr-nose.html?page=2
"Relational databases are particularly good for storing highly
structured information, and not particularly good at managing
semi-structured data.
Semi-structured data is data that has some structure, but is not
rigidly structured. A
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/10/24/follow-yr-nose.html?page=2
"Relational databases are particularly good for storing highly
structured information, and not particularly good at managing
semi-structured data.
Semi-structured data is data that has some structure, but is not
rigidly structured. A
I think I'll play with full-text indexing and maybe with Row Level
Permissions in my wiki :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-dev
On 8/26/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My only critique would be that there's no documentation of how to useyour stuff to test Django apps. Even a quick howto would be super-useful. I'm sure I'll get around to writing one sooner or later, butif you've got the time that would ro
15 matches
Mail list logo
