On 19-Oct-06, at 7:29 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> should probably add mailing lists as a line-item there, too, since
> both
> RoR and Django have extremely high-volume, very helpful mailing lists
and i hope he has mentioned our #django IRC channel - with a
reputation for never RTFM'ing
Hi Jeremy,
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 06:07 -0700, jchatard wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently writing a functional benchmark for french press (IT
> news, programming magazine) about Django, Ruby on Rails and CakePHP.
>
> I started to fill one Excel sheet with Django's assets but then I
> thought
I must say, I **hate** drop-downs for the state postal abbreviation. The
vast majority of the time, when people are filling in a form where they
need a postal abbreviation, they are either:
a. putting their own address and know the abbreviation
b. filling in an address they've been given, which
I've created a new group for integrating G11n data in Django and
Turbogears:
http://groups.google.com/group/webda
Please I need ideas to get the best possible integration.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I've moved all files about globalization to
http://svn.webda.python-hosting.com/trunk/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Todd O'Bryan wrote:
> I've actually been thinking about this, recently. How would people feel
> about a Field type that took a regex to validate input against.
>
> Or, to be even more wacky, how about providing callables that would
> validate the input and normalize it? Something like
>
> def
Works fine for me on OS X 10.4.8, Python 2.4, Intel platform.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To
Clint-You sound skeptical of the utility of adding Bonjour. I'll try to
reason why I think it's important for Django to have this.
Is Django competing for mindshare among web developers? Every little
bit of polish matters. TurboGears already has this, and you can bet
that as Apple integrates
That is cool. Especially if there is no extra library dependency. It
is these little "nice to haves" that can add that extra bit of polish
to Django.
On Oct 17, 10:24 am, Cheng Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2006, at 11:50 PM, Michael Twomey wrote:
>
> > Turbogears just uses the
Hi,
On 10/18/06, Antonio Cavedoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last I heard on this issue is this ticket:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13
>
> But that hasn't gotten much of love, last "action" is from around
> January. The mockups from Wilson look nice anyway, maybe they're
> helpful
On 10/18/06, Rafael SDM Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following suggests, I'm forwarding my mail, from the Django-users to Django-dev list.-- Forwarded message --From:
Rafael SDM Sierra <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Oct 18, 2006 2:52 PMSubject: "Pool" of "one" connection in Apache
Following suggests, I'm forwarding my mail, from the Django-users to Django-dev list.-- Forwarded message --From: Rafael SDM Sierra <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Oct 18, 2006 2:52 PMSubject: "Pool" of "one" connection in ApacheTo:
django-users@googlegroups.comLooking the
sbain wrote:
> How would one now recommend that a new Windows developer install Django
> in a such a way as to facilitate keeping his Django updated to the
> trunk?
I only dabble with Django from time to time, but here is how I have it
set up (the following assumes C:\Python24\ as the root):
1.
Hi Russell,
On 18 Oct 2006, at 14:49, Russell Cloran wrote:
> I'm currently writing an application which would benefit greatly
> from an already-existing drag-n-drop interface for something like
> the order_with_respect_to option.
>
> Is there somebody working on this?
Last I heard on this
On 10/18/06, Niels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rafael SDM Sierra wrote:> Hi, Trying to make Django to use really only ONE connection to ONE process> (like 1000 Threads using 1 connection) I've altered postgresql backend at> base.py. The beta (aka bugged) version is here:
>>
Hello,
I'm currently writing a functional benchmark for french press (IT
news, programming magazine) about Django, Ruby on Rails and CakePHP.
I started to fill one Excel sheet with Django's assets but then I
thought that Django's community would be interested and much more
skilled than me to
Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> On 10/15/06, GinTon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And here you have the files for add/integrate them to any Django
> > project:
> > http://satchmo.python-hosting.com/file/trunk/satchmo/G11n/
> > http://satchmo.python-hosting.com/file/trunk/satchmo/load_G11n.py
>
> It may
Hi,
I'm currently writing an application which would benefit greatly from
an already-existing drag-n-drop interface for something like the
order_with_respect_to option.
Digging around the code, I see that order_with_respect_to seems
unmaintained -- there are portions of the code which are
I've actually been thinking about this, recently. How would people feel
about a Field type that took a regex to validate input against.
Or, to be even more wacky, how about providing callables that would
validate the input and normalize it? Something like
def __init__(self, validator=lambda x:
On 10/15/06, GinTon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And here you have the files for add/integrate them to any Django
> project:
> http://satchmo.python-hosting.com/file/trunk/satchmo/G11n/
> http://satchmo.python-hosting.com/file/trunk/satchmo/load_G11n.py
It may be too much work, or you may not be
Thanks Russ for your message. I became angry because I have been
working very hard during 2 or 3 months.
I hoped that somebody said some idea for its possible implementation
Using those data we could have fields as USStateField and
PhoneNumberField for all countries (and validators). But I
Rafael SDM Sierra wrote:
> Hi, Trying to make Django to use really only ONE connection to ONE process
> (like 1000 Threads using 1 connection) I've altered postgresql backend at
> base.py. The beta (aka bugged) version is here:
>
> http://pastebin.com/808647
>
> My question is if this alteration
I have posted above links in the Audio Book section given below.
Those who do not wish to receive these mails, can create a filter in thier email box for directly deleting without entering such mails in their email. -- With warm regardsP K Kothari
23 matches
Mail list logo
