I've noticed that a LOT of people get bitten by the problem where
every SQL statement is logged if DEBUG=True, resulting in huge memory
consumption after a while. This problem seems particularly common for
import scripts, which are often run in development (hence with DEBUG
on) and can involve tho
On Apr 17, 5:04 pm, "Jeremy Dunck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Middleware is easy to set and forget. Is there a reason not to make
> SecureForm the default, and InsecureForm for people using Ajax? ;-)
I'm pretty sure we can handle the Ajax case by not doing CSRF token
checks if request.is_ajax
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Simon Willison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that a LOT of people get bitten by the problem where
> every SQL statement is logged if DEBUG=True, resulting in huge memory
> consumption after a while. This problem seems particularly common for
> impor
I'd second Simon's proposal. People often develop their projects on
production servers and need to have debug on. Having to manually flush
the query log disrupts their normal workflow. I'd suggest being kind
to the users and not work against their intuition by default. As Simon
proposed, whoever n
I just exported newforms-admin branch e try to apply this patch
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7028
It fails on django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py because it
is in DOS mode!!!
Why on earth?
Ciao.
Marco.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this me
On 19 Apr, 13:37, Marcob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just exported newforms-admin branch e try to apply this
> patchhttp://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7028
> It fails on django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py because it
> is in DOS mode!!!
> Why on earth?
Gotcha!
Some of the files
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 05:02 -0700, Marcob wrote:
> On 19 Apr, 13:37, Marcob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just exported newforms-admin branch e try to apply this
> > patchhttp://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7028
> > It fails on django/contrib/admin/templatetags/admin_list.py because it
> > i
It's a wonder to me that Subversion doesn't allow this setting to be
made repo-wide. The fact that Marco can set it for every file on his
client, or the core team can set it file-by-file for all clients, but no
one can make it true for all files for everyone, seems to me to be a
huge oversight
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a reason you cannot call it just 1.0
So would you prefer to have a beta-quality product whose developers
lie and call it 1.0?
The next version of Django to be released will be 1.0. It will most
likely be preceded by
I have a concern with calling it beta. It would be difficult to sell a
commercial product based on a beta framework.
How long do you expect to remain in beta?
Is there a reason you cannot call it just 1.0
thanks
Ashish
On Apr 18, 9:59 am, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, A
I can't test it but I bet something is wrong with changeset 7427.
AFAIK query_class method should create the OracleQuery class as
subclass of DefaultQueryClass and return this new class with correct
backend-specific resolve_columns and as_sql methods. But it does
something strange here.
I bet Ora
On 19-Apr-08, at 8:52 PM, James Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Is there a reason you cannot call it just 1.0
>
> So would you prefer to have a beta-quality product whose developers
> lie and call it 1.0?
I wouldn't even call the cur
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On 19-Apr-08, at 8:52 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>
>
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:17 AM, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a reason you cannot call it just 1.0
>>>
>> So would you prefer to have a beta-quality product whose developers
On 20-Apr-08, at 12:47 AM, Steve Holden wrote:
>> I wouldn't even call the current svn head a beta-quality product
>>
>>
> Which is probably why it isn't yet a beta release?
what I meant is that it is stable and production ready and that it is
time people stopped evaluating products by lookin
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How to do the version tuple is mostly a bikeshed argument. Ultimately,
> > three things matter in deciding how to handle it:
> >
> > 1. The BDFLs/core dev team are OK with it.
> >
> > 2. The system used is
> I bet Oracle is broken in qs-rf.
Yeah, Malcolm opened up #7036 two days ago in response to errors
reported by Ian Kelly. I've attached a patch.
The problem had to do with `resolve_columns` not taking into account
that extra select SQL is in a different position due to changes in
#7340. The e
16 matches
Mail list logo
