Is there anyone working for this ticket?
There seemed to be few patches but then a silence.
I would be interested in to help/implement that feature since it's very
highly needed feature in our own code.
--
Jani Tiainen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
On Oct 12, 12:56 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Sorry? Django importing magic? "from app.models import MyModel"... is magic?
I didn't say "model importing". I'm talking about things like the
restrictions on what you can import in settings.py, and ticket #8193
(double imports).
> If you're re
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Zachary Voase
wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct 2009, at 23:39, Joshua Russo wrote:
>
>> How about the possibility of an advanced tutorial, to highlight more
>> advanced features.
>
> That's pretty much what the Django Book is for.
No, it really isn't.
Firstly, The Django Bo
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 4:31 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> However, I can't recall the last time that someone asked the general
>> question of how to avoid a name collision between their two tagging
>> (or whatever) applications.
>
> I don't reca
Thanks!
I commented out these lines
#urlpatterns = patterns('',
#(r'^admin/', include(admin.site.urls)),
#)
and will try the info you suggest
-Wolf
>
> If the admin worked fine and then broke during section three then you're
> likely hitting #11959, not #10050:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Wolf.Halton wrote:
>
> Ticket #10050 (closed: fixed)
>
> Opened 9 months ago
>
> Last modified 3 minutes ago
> Documentation bug in tutorial / admin manual? 'AdminSite' object has
> no attribute 'urls'
>
> Here is what I need to ask. What trivial issue did I miss
I think this is a great idea.
I volunteer to test the tutorial.
Wolf
On Oct 9, 10:41 am, Rob Hudson wrote:
> I'd like to propose the addition of a new tutorial that represents a
> complete website, describing everything from start to finish. This
> would allow for many more topics to come into
Ticket #10050 (closed: fixed)
Opened 9 months ago
Last modified 3 minutes ago
Documentation bug in tutorial / admin manual? 'AdminSite' object has
no attribute 'urls'
Here is what I need to ask. What trivial issue did I miss while doing
the dev/tutorial? presuming ubernostrum's response is ac
On 11 Oct 2009, at 23:39, Joshua Russo wrote:
> How about the possibility of an advanced tutorial, to highlight more
> advanced features.
That's pretty much what the Django Book is for.
--
Zack
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are s
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Rajeev J Sebastian <
rajeev.sebast...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Zachary Voase
> wrote:
> >
> > On 11 Oct 2009, at 16:09, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> >
> >> I don't want to be overly negative, but in my view rewriting the
> >> tutorial would
On Oct 11, 4:31 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> If you can name a company that has produced more in-house Django
> applications than the number that is publicly available for download
> off the internet, I'll eat my hat. :-)
That isn't the right measure. I'm just saying that the total number o
>
>
> > def assertFormError(self, response, form, field, errors, msg=None):
> >...
> >self.fail(msg or "The field '%s' on form '%s' in context %d"
> > " contains no errors" % (field, form, i))
>
> would become:
>
> prefix = msg and "%s: " % msg or ""
> self.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Zachary Voase
wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct 2009, at 16:09, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>> I don't want to be overly negative, but in my view rewriting the
>> tutorial would be a pointless waste of energy. It has served us
>> exceptionally well over the past 4 years, and none o
On Oct 11, 7:57 pm, Hanne Moa wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 04:42, Simon Willison wrote:
> > I'm keen to receive as much feedback on the implementation as possible.
>
> It is perfectly possible to set up logging in such a way that all the
> logs for several programs wind up in the same file,
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 01:46, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Hanne Moa wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 13:51, Russell Keith-Magee
>> wrote:
>>> Looking at #3591 in particular - another big part of the problem is
>>> that the ticket tries to solve a theoret
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 04:42, Simon Willison wrote:
> I'm keen to receive as much feedback on the implementation as possible.
It is perfectly possible to set up logging in such a way that all the
logs for several programs wind up in the same file, or there are
duplicate entries. The first happe
On 11 Oct 2009, at 16:09, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> I don't want to be overly negative, but in my view rewriting the
> tutorial would be a pointless waste of energy. It has served us
> exceptionally well over the past 4 years, and none of the problems
> with it are fundamental, we'd be far better ser
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 9:52 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>>
>> This is true, but again, the distinction between theoretical and
>> practical problem emerges. The set of mainstream apps in the
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:24 AM, andybak wrote:
>
> Another thing that might be useful to cover in the tutorial is the
> 'building for re-usability' ideas that have devloped via Pinax et al.
>
> Maybe at least one part of the functionality developed in the tutorial
> should be in the form an app
On Oct 11, 9:52 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> This is true, but again, the distinction between theoretical and
> practical problem emerges. The set of mainstream apps in the wild is
> much larger than the set of in house apps controlled
Another thing that might be useful to cover in the tutorial is the
'building for re-usability' ideas that have devloped via Pinax et al.
Maybe at least one part of the functionality developed in the tutorial
should be in the form an app intended to be used across projects.
Combine this with incor
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 12:46 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> If I may ask - which apps (or app names) caused the collision? Off the
>> top of my head, I can't think of any especially mainstream application
>
> Considering just "mainstream" applicat
On Oct 11, 12:46 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> If I may ask - which apps (or app names) caused the collision? Off the
> top of my head, I can't think of any especially mainstream application
Considering just "mainstream" applications would appear to discount
any applications which are develop
23 matches
Mail list logo
