> It might be worth considering if there are any methods for passing a
> callback function that are better than GET parameters—though I can't
> think of any off the top of my head.
>
I can't provide better solution too.
I look at the django.contrib.admin source. This can be applied only if 'pop'
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Iván Raskovsky wrote:
> Well.. I wasn't sure when to send this email, mostly cause I haven't
> had time to properly document everything, but Russ' talk Wither
> Django[0] seems to have done it.
>
> One of the points he mentions in what he'd
On Jun 10, 2:05 pm, Matt Bennett wrote:
> Is there a reason the call to logger.error can't come before we return
> the technical_500_response when DEBUG=True? It seems to me that the
> debug level should be checked in each individual handler, rather than
> determining whether
When i use the version 2.4.1 of psycopgs testing works normal, but
with 2.4.2 i got this error:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16250
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
On 13 juin 2011, at 18:07, Jannis Leidel wrote:
> On 13.06.2011, at 17:19, Carl Meyer wrote:
>> I agree with all of this. I would be in favor of simply removing the
>> wildcard feature with a note in the release notes, unless someone pops
>> up to argue that it's more widely-used than we think and
On 13.06.2011, at 17:19, Carl Meyer wrote:
> On 06/12/2011 03:35 PM, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>> I checked the SVN history. This "feature" was never documented, even
>> before the reorganization at r8506. It appears in
>> django/conf/__init__.py when magic-removal is merged (r2809).
>>
>> We
On 06/12/2011 03:35 PM, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
> I checked the SVN history. This "feature" was never documented, even
> before the reorganization at r8506. It appears in
> django/conf/__init__.py when magic-removal is merged (r2809).
>
> We just discussed it on IRC, and the consensus is that it
I think this is a great idea! I would certainly benefit from it.
It might be worth considering if there are any methods for passing a
callback function that are better than GET parameters—though I can't
think of any off the top of my head.
H.
On Jun 13, 12:16 am, Alex Kamedov
Hi all,
Over the coding sprints at djangocon.eu I started working on a proposal
for customizable serialization. [1]
I've talked over the API and implementation with Russ, and I think we're
broadly happy with it all,
so I'd like to open it up to wider discussion.
What I have right now looks