On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Mayur Patil wrote:
> Hello,
>
>Most of the organizations(Eclipse,Fedora,
>
>VLC etc) have created their GSoC Idea page.
>
>Where is Idea page for Django?
>
>I am eagerly waiting for it !!
>
Hi Mayur,
The period for organizations to apply for GSoC 2
To clarify a little bit, the reasons I think it's a good idea are because:
* It's simple and clean.
* It doesn't require another setting, nor new middleware methods, nor
new anything actually.
* It makes Django inter-op a tiny bit better (if you want to use
Django's ORM and request-linked commits
On 5 mars 2013, at 23:13, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> For lack of a better idea, I'm considering deprecating the middleware and
> replacing it with a setting. This doesn't qualify as loose coupling; better
> ideas welcome!
Jacob just suggested on IRC using a WSGI middleware. It's two lines of
Unfortunately this would break in subtle in confusing ways in inheritance
scenarios.
Say you've defined the following Manager subclass prior to Django 1.6 and
we're only raising a warning on Manager.get_query_set calls.:
class ActiveManager(models.Manager):
def get_query_set(self, *args,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:21 PM, charettes wrote:
> The use of the metaclass make sure you're not shooting yourself in the foot
> all and all the metaclass subclassing trouble should only concern a minority
> of users who most probably know what they're doing.
Ah, OK, that's the missing part I wa
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Florian Apolloner wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 3:32:45 PM UTC+1, Michael Manfre wrote:
>>
>> The lack of data validation is definitely a nogo for production sites,
>> but imo sqlite in production is also a nogo.
>>
>
> Right, but shipping Django with a non
Hi,
On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 3:32:45 PM UTC+1, Michael Manfre wrote:
>
> The lack of data validation is definitely a nogo for production sites, but
> imo sqlite in production is also a nogo.
>
Right, but shipping Django with a non production db might send interesting
signals to endusers ;)
There's a good, although non-obvious, reason.
Without the metaclass, a method overridden in the subclass with the old name
would be silently skipped.
--
Aymeric.
Le 6 mars 2013 à 16:30, Jacob Kaplan-Moss a écrit :
> Hm.
>
> I'm +1 on cleaning up the names but do we *really* have to use
Hm.
I'm +1 on cleaning up the names but do we *really* have to use a
metaclass for this? Seems to me this is "gratuitous use of a
metaclass" territory, especially given the shenanigans you have to go
through with subclassing the metaclass.
I'd be a lot happier with this patch if it just did t
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> I, for one, would prefer that we not recommend TransactionMiddleware
> so highly.
then what would be the recommended option to have transactions tied to
the request/response cycle?
probably @commit_on_success for every view that modifies the
Hi Andre,
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 5:39:29 PM UTC-5, Andre Terra wrote:
>
> If I may weigh in on the matter as an outsider, if we consider "The Django
> Project" as a "business", insofar as it aims to have as many users and be
> as ubiquitous as possible, there's considerable value in having MS
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 5:01:01 PM UTC-5, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>
> Hi Shai,
>
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:32:29 PM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote:
>>
>> In recent years, I have been the main contributor to South's MSSQL and
>> Oracle
>> backends. I am biased towards having MSSQL treated as a
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 3:31:59 PM UTC-5, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While I agree that moving database adapters out of core has some merit, I
> don't think that having sqlite as a reference implementation is a good
> idea: For one some features are somewhat hacky in sqlite (and peo
On Wednesday, 6 March 2013 16:12:18 UTC+7, jdunck wrote:
>
> Can
> you give a concrete example of an exception being raised at commit
> time?
>
Postgres allows for things like foreign key integrity checks to be made on
commit (rather than when the data is entered). This makes it significantl
On 6 mars 2013, at 08:49, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Aymeric Augustin
> wrote:
>> In the mean time, I discovered that it's impossible to implement
>> TransactionMiddleware reliably as a middleware, because there's no guarantee
>> that process_response or process_exception
Hello,
Most of the organizations(Eclipse,Fedora,
VLC etc) have created their GSoC Idea page.
Where is Idea page for Django?
I am eagerly waiting for it !!
Seeking for Guidance,
Thank you !!
--
*Cheers,
Mayur*.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
I, for one, would prefer that we not recommend TransactionMiddleware
so highly. Now that I'm doing active development with Rails, it's
quite clear to me that a major difference in the ORM layers are which
DB they grew up with -- the django orm is tuned best to postgres,
while working passably on m
I'm not sure what you're referring to here - integrity, uniqueness,
and locking are handled at the individual query level - transactions
just cause locks to be held (if needed) until commit or rollback. Can
you give a concrete example of an exception being raised at commit
time?
On Tue, Mar 5, 2
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> On 4 mars 2013, at 01:07, Shai Berger wrote:
...
>> The use of savepoints in Django apps so far has been very little, as far as
>> I know. One point
>> I'm unsure of is the interaction of savepoints with cursors, since querysets
>> are l
Hi Andre,
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 11:39:29 PM UTC+1, Andre Terra wrote:
>
> but at work I'm restricted to corporate rules, MS SQL or Oracle, and
> Windows.
Right, that's probably one of the reasons why Oracle is in core (aside from
the fact that we were completely monolithic at that time).
On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 8:49:37 AM UTC+1, Ian wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Aymeric Augustin
> > wrote:
> > In the mean time, I discovered that it's impossible to implement
> > TransactionMiddleware reliably as a middleware, because there's no
> guarantee
> > that process_resp
21 matches
Mail list logo
