On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:50 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Speaking of:
> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20291
>
> I don't see how is this ticket related to #3591 (which BTW says "add
> support for custom app_label and verbose_name"). This one is a little
> atomic piece of work and a handy addition
Sorry, I misunderstood the original request. Yes, you're right Anssi and
Adrian, finding them on demand is reasonable.
Alex
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen
wrote:
> On 25 huhti, 20:08, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> > This sounds like a reasonable request, I don't yet have an opinion o
On 25 huhti, 20:08, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> This sounds like a reasonable request, I don't yet have an opinion on API
> or anything. One tiny thing I'd like to note though, "change DeferredAttribute
> to find all *other* DeferredAttributes". I don't think `finding` is the
> right way to think about i
On 25 huhti, 23:44, Alex Ogier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Florian Apolloner
> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:06:06 PM UTC+2, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>
> >> Also, I should mention that this should be *optional* behavior, as the
> >> current behavior is reasonable for the
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Florian Apolloner wrote:
> On Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:06:06 PM UTC+2, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>>
>> Also, I should mention that this should be *optional* behavior, as the
>> current behavior is reasonable for the common case. The API for specifying
>> this "load
On 25 avr. 2013, at 04:22, Yo-Yo Ma wrote:
> The following example can throw a wrench in things, if you don't catch it
> right away, since it fails silently.
>
> >>> instance.some_fk_field = unsaved_instance
> >>> instance.save()
>
> The following example bit somebody I worked with a couple ye
On Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:06:06 PM UTC+2, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>
> Also, I should mention that this should be *optional* behavior, as the
> current behavior is reasonable for the common case. The API for specifying
> this "load everything" behavior is a separate discussion. Perhaps a keywor
This sounds like a reasonable request, I don't yet have an opinion on API
or anything. One tiny thing I'd like to note though, "change DeferredAttribute
to find all *other* DeferredAttributes". I don't think `finding` is the
right way to think about it, a `DeferredAttribute` with loadall semantics
At the moment, if you call defer() or only() on a QuerySet, then access the
deferred fields individually, *each* access of a deferred field will result
in a separate query.
For example, assuming a User model with username/bio/location fields, this
is what currently happens:
"""
>>> u = User.objec
Hi,
Speaking of:
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20291
I don't see how is this ticket related to #3591 (which BTW says "add
support for custom app_label and verbose_name"). This one is a little
atomic piece of work and a handy addition that I need as well, and waiting
for a ticket that i
10 matches
Mail list logo
